World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
Sweden
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
87
Citations
21641
World Ranking
694
National Ranking
9

Kevin Bishop publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kevin Bishop sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 392 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Kevin Bishop D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kevin Bishop sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Sweden Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Sweden Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Sweden Leader Award

Overview

Kevin Bishop is affiliated with the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences in Sweden and has a research focus within Environmental Science. Their work encompasses several specialized areas including Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Ecology, Atmospheric Science, Water Science and Technology, and Pollution.

Their scientific contributions span a number of main research topics, notably:

  • Mercury impact and mitigation studies
  • Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Heavy metals in environment
  • Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics

Among recent publications, Kevin Bishop is the sole author of the 2020 article "Recent advances in understanding and measurement of mercury in the environment: Terrestrial Hg cycling" published in The Science of The Total Environment. This work has been cited extensively within environmental research.

Frequent co-authors in their collaborative network include Mats B. Nilsson, Erik Björn, Stefan Osterwalder, Jan Seibert, and Hjalmar Laudon, with whom they have contributed to multiple projects and academic papers.

The venues where Kevin Bishop most often publishes highlight a focus on hydrological and environmental sciences. Key journals and platforms featuring their work include:

  • Hydrological Processes
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • Journal of Hydrology
  • Nature Communications

Selected notable papers from the broader research context connected to their field include:

  • "Toward catchment hydro-biogeochemical theories," 2020, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Water
  • "The effects of forest management on water quality," 2022, Forest Ecology and Management
  • "Reviews and syntheses: Biological weathering and its consequences at different spatial levels - from nanoscale to global scale," 2020, Biogeosciences
  • "Northern landscapes in transition: Evidence, approach and ways forward using the Krycklan Catchment Study," 2021, Hydrological Processes

Best Publications

  • On the forest cover–water yield debate: from demand‐ to supply‐side thinking

    David Ellison;David Ellison;David Ellison;Martyn N. Futter;Kevin Bishop;Kevin Bishop

  • Human domination of the global water cycle absent from depictions and perceptions

    Benjamin W. Abbott;Kevin Bishop;Jay P. Zarnetske;Camille Minaudo

  • Patterns and dynamics of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in boreal streams: The role of processes, connectivity, and scaling

    Hjalmar Laudon;Martin Berggren;Martin Berggren;Anneli Ågren;Ishi Buffam

  • Resolving the Double Paradox of rapidly mobilized old water with highly variable responses in runoff chemistry

    Kevin Bishop;Jan Seibert;Stephan Jürgen Köhler;Hjalmar Laudon

  • Modeling spatial patterns of saturated areas: A comparison of the topographic wetness index and a dynamic distributed model

    T Grabs;Jan Seibert;Jan Seibert;K Bishop;H Laudon

  • Thirty-five years of synchrony in the organic matter concentrations of Swedish rivers explained by variation in flow and sulphate

    Martin Erlandsson;Ishi Buffam;Jens Fölster;Hjalmar Laudon

  • A meta-analysis of the effects of nitrogen additions on base cations: Implications for plants, soils, and streams

    R. W. Lucas;Jonatan Klaminder;M. N. Futter;K. H. Bishop;K. H. Bishop

  • Aqua Incognita: the unknown headwaters

    Kevin H Bishop;Ishi Buffam;M Erlandsson;J Fölster

  • Biomass offsets little or none of permafrost carbon release from soils, streams, and wildfire: an expert assessment

    Benjamin W. Abbott;Jeremy B. Jones;Edward A. G. Schuur;F. Stuart Chapin

  • The Krycklan Catchment Study—A flagship infrastructure for hydrology, biogeochemistry, and climate research in the boreal landscape

    Hjalmar Laudon;Ida Taberman;Anneli Ågren;Martyn Futter

  • Linking soil- and stream-water chemistry based on a Riparian Flow-Concentration Integration Model

    Jan Seibert;Jan Seibert;Thomas Grabs;S. Köhler;H. Laudon

  • Evasion of CO2 from streams - the dominant component of the carbon export through the aquatic conduit in a boreal landscape.

    Marcus B. Wallin;Marcus B. Wallin;Thomas Grabs;Ishi Buffam;Hjalmar Laudon

  • Hydrological flow paths during snowmelt: Congruence between hydrometric measurements and oxygen 18 in meltwater, soil water, and runoff

    Hjalmar Laudon;Jan Seibert;Stephan Jürgen Köhler;Kevin Bishop

  • The origins of acid runoff in a hillslope during storm events

    K.H. Bishop;H. Grip;A. O'Neill

  • Landscape-scale variability of acidity and dissolved organic carbon during spring flood in a boreal stream network

    Ishi Buffam;Hjalmar Laudon;Hjalmar Laudon;Johan Temnerud;Johan Temnerud;Carl-Magnus Mörth

  • Advances in understanding the podzolization process resulting from a multidisciplinary study of three coniferous forest soils in the Nordic Countries

    U.S. Lundström;N. van Breemen;D.C. Bain;P.A.W. van Hees

  • Xylem sap as a pathway for total mercury and methylmercury transport from soils to tree canopy in the boreal forest

    Kevin H. Bishop;Ying-Hua Lee;John Munthe;Etienne Dambrine

  • Storage as a Metric of Catchment Comparison

    James P. McNamara;Doerthe Tetzlaff;Kevin Bishop;Christopher Soulsby

  • Groundwater dynamics along a hillslope: A test of the steady state hypothesis

    Jan Seibert;Kevin Bishop;Allan Rodhe;Jeffrey J. McDonnell

  • Dissolved organic carbon characteristics in boreal streams in a forest-wetland gradient during the transition between winter and summer

    Anneli Ågren;Ishi Buffam;Ishi Buffam;Martin Berggren;Kevin Bishop

  • Transit Times for Water in a Small Till Catchment from a Step Shift in the Oxygen 18 Content of the Water Input

    Allan Rodhe;Lars Nyberg;Kevin Bishop

  • Biomass offsets little or none of permafrost carbon release from soils, streams, and wildfire

    Benjamin W. Abbott;Jeremy B. Jones;Edward A. G. Schuur;F. Stuart Chapin

Frequent Co-Authors

Hjalmar Laudon
Hjalmar Laudon Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Jan Seibert
Jan Seibert University of Zurich
Stephan J. Köhler
Stephan J. Köhler Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Ishi Buffam
Ishi Buffam University of Cincinnati
Martyn N. Futter
Martyn N. Futter Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Mats Nilsson
Mats Nilsson Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Stefan Löfgren
Stefan Löfgren Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Per-Erik Mellander
Per-Erik Mellander Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority
Ryan A. Sponseller
Ryan A. Sponseller Umeå University
Markus Meili
Markus Meili Stockholm University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those passionate about Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Many students look for flexible and affordable options, such as accredited programs offering advanced education. For educators seeking leadership roles, several universities provide reputable online eds to edd programs that combine convenience with academic rigor.

Social work is another field where environmental and community health intersect. If you're interested in combining these interests, consider programs like the cheapest online dsw programs that balance quality with accessibility, enabling you to further your impact on both social and environmental well-being.

For students just starting out or looking for broad foundational knowledge, degrees such as the online general studies bachelor degree cheap provide flexible pathways that allow customization around environmental topics and other academic interests.

Additionally, those seeking a role quickly may benefit from understanding the easiest degree to get, helping to identify straightforward programs that still support a sustainable career in environmental fields. Choosing the right degree depends on your goals, time, and resources, but online options have made education more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Kevin Bishop

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles