World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
59
Citations
20905
World Ranking
3346
National Ranking
55

Eli Biham publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eli Biham sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 128 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Eli Biham D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eli Biham sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eli Biham is affiliated with the Technion - Israel Institute of Technology in Israel. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Computer Science, with work spanning several subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, and Signal Processing.

The subfield of Artificial Intelligence accounts for a significant portion of their publications, alongside notable contributions in Computer Networks and Communications and Signal Processing. This distribution of research highlights a multidisciplinary approach that integrates computational intelligence with communication systems.

The main topics covered in their research include:

  • Cryptographic Implementations and Security
  • Bluetooth and Wireless Communication Technologies
  • Advanced Authentication Protocols Security
  • Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
  • Security and Verification in Computing

Eli Biham collaborates regularly with a group of co-authors, among whom Stav Perle is the most frequent collaborator, followed by Lior Neumann and Gal Benmocha. These collaborations likely contribute to the diversity of their research output.

Their work intersects with topics related to security in computing and communications, focusing on cryptographic methods and wireless technologies such as Bluetooth. This implies active engagement with both theoretical aspects and practical implementations in cybersecurity and network protocols.

Best Publications

  • Differential cryptanalysis of DES-like cryptosystems

    Eli Biham;Adi Shamir

  • Differential fault analysis of secret key cryptosystems

    E. Biham;A. Shamir

  • Differential Cryptanalysis of the Data Encryption Standard

    Eli Biham;Adi Shamir

  • Cryptanalysis of Skipjack Reduced to 31 Rounds Using Impossible Differentials

    Eli Biham;Alex Biryukov;Adi Shamir

  • New types of cryptanalytic attacks using related keys

    Eli Biham

  • Differential Cryptanalysis of the Full 16-Round DES

    Eli Biham;Adi Shamir

  • Collisions of SHA-0 and reduced SHA-1

    Eli Biham;Rafi Chen;Antoine Joux;Patrick Carribault

  • Serpent: A Proposal for the Advanced Encryption Standard

    Ross Anderson;Eli Biham;Lars Knudsen

  • Instant Ciphertext-Only Cryptanalysis of GSM Encrypted Communication

    Elad Barkan;Eli Biham;Nathan Keller

  • A Fast New DES Implementation in Software

    Eli Biham

  • Serpent: A New Block Cipher Proposal

    Eli Biham;Ross J. Anderson;Lars R. Knudsen

  • The Rectangle Attack - Rectangling the Serpent.

    Eli Biham;Orr Dunkelman;Nathan Keller

  • Near-collisions of SHA-0

    Eli Biham;Rafi Chen

  • Related-Key boomerang and rectangle attacks

    Eli Biham;Orr Dunkelman;Nathan Keller

  • A Framework for Iterative Hash Functions — HAIFA ?

    Eli Biham;Orr Dunkelman

  • Quantum cryptographic network based on quantum memories.

    Eli Biham;Bruno Huttner;Tal Mor

  • A Proof of the Security of Quantum Key Distribution

    Eli Biham;Michel Boyer;P. Oscar Boykin;Tal Mor

  • Miss in the Middle Attacks on IDEA and Khufu

    Eli Biham;Alex Biryukov;Adi Shamir

  • Cryptanalysis of the A5/1 GSM Stream Cipher

    Eli Biham;Orr Dunkelman

  • A related-key rectangle attack on the full KASUMI

    Eli Biham;Orr Dunkelman;Nathan Keller

  • A proof of the security of quantum key distribution (extended abstract)

    Eli Biham;Michel Boyer;P. Oscar Boykin;Tal Mor

  • Related-Key Boomerang and Rectangle Attacks.

    Jongsung Kim;Seokhie Hong;Bart Preneel;Eli Biham

Frequent Co-Authors

Orr Dunkelman
Orr Dunkelman University of Haifa
Nathan Keller
Nathan Keller Bar-Ilan University
Adi Shamir
Adi Shamir Weizmann Institute of Science
Alex Biryukov
Alex Biryukov University of Luxembourg
Lars R. Knudsen
Lars R. Knudsen University of Southern Denmark
Ross Anderson
Ross Anderson University of Cambridge
Markus Grassl
Markus Grassl University of Gdańsk
Bart Preneel
Bart Preneel KU Leuven
Daniel A. Lidar
Daniel A. Lidar University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in expanding their education beyond Computer Science, online degrees offer flexible and affordable options. Many universities now provide a variety of programs that can complement technical skills or broaden your career prospects.

Professionals aiming for leadership can explore affordable emba programs to enhance management expertise. If you’re drawn to information organization and digital resources, accredited mlis programs are available online and combine well with technology backgrounds.

There are also numerous affordable master degree programs in fields such as data science, business analytics, and engineering, ideal for those seeking specialized knowledge. Ambitious professionals who wish to lead organizations may consider pursuing an advanced doctorate in leadership, which can open doors to executive roles in both the public and private sectors.

Exploring related online degrees expands your opportunities, allowing you to customize your educational journey and adapt to the evolving demands of today’s job market.

Best Scientists Citing Eli Biham

Trending Scientists