World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Orr Dunkelman

Orr Dunkelman

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
47
Citations
7893
World Ranking
6559
National Ranking
103

Orr Dunkelman publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Orr Dunkelman sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 183 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Orr Dunkelman D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Orr Dunkelman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Orr Dunkelman is affiliated with the University of Haifa in Israel and specializes primarily in the field of Computer Science. Their research output spans various subfields, including Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Signal Processing, Hardware and Architecture, and Computer Networks and Communications. The work concentrates notably on cryptographic implementations and security, coding theory, chaos-based image and signal encryption, physical unclonable functions (PUFs) and hardware security, biometric identification and security, cryptography and data security, as well as face recognition and analysis.

Among recent publications authored or co-authored by Orr Dunkelman are the following papers:

  • "The QARMAv2 Family of Tweakable Block Ciphers," 2023, IACR Transactions on Symmetric Cryptology
  • "Inverting Binarizations of Facial Templates Produced by Deep Learning (and Its Implications)," 2021, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
  • "Finding Collisions against 4-Round SHA-3-384 in Practical Time," 2022, IACR Transactions on Symmetric Cryptology
  • "Practical Related-Key Forgery Attacks on Full-Round TinyJAMBU-192/256," 2023, IACR Transactions on Symmetric Cryptology
  • "Collaboration between Government and Research Community to Respond to COVID-19: Israel's Case," 2021, Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and Complexity

Dunkelman's frequent co-authors include:

  • Nathan Keller
  • Adi Shamir
  • Eyal Ronen
  • Shibam Ghosh
  • Eran Lambooij

The most common publication venues where Dunkelman's research appears include:

  • IACR Transactions on Symmetric Cryptology
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Designs Codes and Cryptography
  • Lecture Notes in Computer Science
  • IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security

In terms of book publications, they have contributed to works published by Springer Science+Business Media, specifically "Advances in Cryptology - EUROCRYPT 2022" and "Selected Areas in Cryptography."

Best Publications

  • KATAN and KTANTAN -- A Family of Small and Efficient Hardware-Oriented Block Ciphers

    Christophe Cannière;Orr Dunkelman;Miroslav Knežević

  • The Rectangle Attack - Rectangling the Serpent.

    Eli Biham;Orr Dunkelman;Nathan Keller

  • Related-Key boomerang and rectangle attacks

    Eli Biham;Orr Dunkelman;Nathan Keller

  • A Framework for Iterative Hash Functions — HAIFA ?

    Eli Biham;Orr Dunkelman

  • Key recovery attacks of practical complexity on AES-256 variants with up to 10 rounds

    Alex Biryukov;Orr Dunkelman;Nathan Keller;Dmitry Khovratovich

  • Cryptanalysis of the A5/1 GSM Stream Cipher

    Eli Biham;Orr Dunkelman

  • New Impossible Differential Attacks on AES

    Jiqiang Lu;Orr Dunkelman;Nathan Keller;Jongsung Kim

  • A related-key rectangle attack on the full KASUMI

    Eli Biham;Orr Dunkelman;Nathan Keller

  • No Bot Expects the DeepCAPTCHA! Introducing Immutable Adversarial Examples, With Applications to CAPTCHA Generation

    Margarita Osadchy;Julio Hernandez-Castro;Stuart Gibson;Orr Dunkelman

  • Minimalism in cryptography: the even-mansour scheme revisited

    Orr Dunkelman;Nathan Keller;Adi Shamir

  • Improved Single-Key Attacks on 8-Round AES-192 and AES-256

    Orr Dunkelman;Nathan Keller;Adi Shamir

  • A practical-time related-key attack on the KASUMI cryptosystem used in GSM and 3G telephony

    Orr Dunkelman;Nathan Keller;Adi Shamir

  • A practical attack on KeeLoq

    Sebastiaan Indesteege;Nathan Keller;Orr Dunkelman;Eli Biham

  • A Practical Attack on KeeLoq

    Sebastiaan Indesteege;Nathan Keller;Eli Biham;Orr Dunkelman

  • New results on boomerang and rectangle attacks

    Eli Biham;Orr Dunkelman;Nathan Keller

  • Enhancing differential-linear cryptanalysis

    Eli Biham;Orr Dunkelman;Nathan Keller

  • Improving the efficiency of impossible differential cryptanalysis of reduced Camellia and MISTY1

    Jiqiang Lu;Jongsung Kim;Nathan Keller;Orr Dunkelman

  • KATAN & KTANTAN - A Family of Small and Efficient Hardware-Oriented Block Ciphers

    Christophe De Cannière;Orr Dunkelman;Miroslav Knezevic

  • Related-Key impossible differential attacks on 8-round AES-192

    Eli Biham;Orr Dunkelman;Nathan Keller

  • New attacks on keccak-224 and keccak-256

    Itai Dinur;Orr Dunkelman;Adi Shamir

  • ECRYPT yearly report on algorithms and keysizes

    Steve Babbage;Dario Catalano;Carlos Cid;Benne de Weger

  • A Practical Attack on KeeLoq

    Wim Aerts;Eli Biham;Dieter De Moitié;Elke De Mulder

  • Improved Single-Key Attacks on 8-Round AES-192 and AES-256

    Orr Dunkelman;Nathan Keller;Adi Shamir

  • Related-Key Boomerang and Rectangle Attacks.

    Jongsung Kim;Seokhie Hong;Bart Preneel;Eli Biham

Frequent Co-Authors

Nathan Keller
Nathan Keller Bar-Ilan University
Adi Shamir
Adi Shamir Weizmann Institute of Science
Eli Biham
Eli Biham Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Bart Preneel
Bart Preneel KU Leuven
Pierre-Alain Fouque
Pierre-Alain Fouque University of Rennes
Alex Biryukov
Alex Biryukov University of Luxembourg
Christian Rechberger
Christian Rechberger Graz University of Technology
John Kelsey
John Kelsey National Institute of Standards and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees can open up new educational and career pathways in computer science and related fields. Many students seek flexible options, such as online associate degrees, which offer a quick and cost-effective entry point into tech careers or further study. For those aiming higher, pursuing a cheap doctorate degree online can minimize educational costs while maximizing long-term academic and professional opportunities.

Time is also a major consideration for busy professionals. Choosing the fastest online edd programs is a smart way to achieve advanced qualifications without years of full-time study. For students deciding between tech and business, understanding online business degree cost can help weigh the return on investment when planning future steps.

Each of these pathways–from associate to doctorate and beyond–allows students to tailor their education to their schedule, budget, and career aspirations, making it easier to succeed in today’s fast-changing job market.

Best Scientists Citing Orr Dunkelman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles