World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 40 8023 7488 4288 3901 83 23458

Wendi L. Gardner publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Wendi L. Gardner between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Wendi L. Gardner published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 2.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 6 publications in 2008. 4 of the 85 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 6. Peak 6 publications in 2008. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 3 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 4 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 1 publication 2018: 5 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 0 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 2 publications
1993 2025

85 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Wendi L. Gardner: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 2
1995 1
1996 3
1997 2
1998 0
1999 3
2000 5
2001 2
2002 2
2003 3
2004 3
2005 3
2006 1
2007 4
2008 6
2009 5
2010 5
2011 4
2012 3
2013 0
2014 5
2015 5
2016 1
2017 1
2018 5
2019 0
2020 2
2021 3
2022 1
2023 0
2024 2
2025 2
Total 85
Download as CSV

Wendi L. Gardner publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wendi L. Gardner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 83 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 83
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Wendi L. Gardner D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wendi L. Gardner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 40
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Wendi L. Gardner is affiliated with Northwestern University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of psychology, with nine publications spanning various subfields including social psychology, demography, experimental and cognitive psychology, applied psychology, and sociology and political science.

The scientist's work frequently addresses topics related to attachment and relationship dynamics, family dynamics and relationships, psychological well-being and life satisfaction, evolutionary psychology and human behavior, behavioral health and interventions, psychological and temporal perspectives research, and cultural differences and values.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Gardner include Lydia F. Emery, Eli J. Finkel, Erin K. Hughes, Katie N. Rotella, and Janeta Nikolovski.

Gardner's recent papers include the following:

  • "Who are 'We'? Couple Identity Clarity and Romantic Relationship Commitment," 2020, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • "Confusion or Clarity? Examining a Possible Tradeoff Between Self-Expansion and Self-Concept Clarity," 2022, Social Psychological and Personality Science
  • "Implicit Maternal Intuition Confidence Is Associated With Maternal Well-Being Across Cultures," 2020, Frontiers in Psychology
  • "The delusion of the disappearing self? Attachment avoidance and the experience of externally invisible self-loss in romantic relationships," 2024, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • "25789 Profiling acne sufferers: From acne types and severity to impact in personal and social life," 2021, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

Gardner has published in several academic venues, including Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Social Psychological and Personality Science, Frontiers in Psychology, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, and the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

In addition to research articles, Gardner has contributed to book publications, notably with Frontiers Media. One such book is titled Developments in Implicit Measurements, published in 2022.

Best Publications

  • Who is this "We"? Levels of collective identity and self representations.

    Marilynn B. Brewer;Wendi Gardner

  • The affect system has parallel and integrative processing components: Form follows function.

    John T. Cacioppo;Wendi L. Gardner;Gary G. Berntson

  • Beyond Bipolar Conceptualizations and Measures: The Case of Attitudes and Evaluative Space:

    John T. Cacioppo;Wendi L. Gardner;Gary G. Berntson

  • “I” Value Freedom, but “We” Value Relationships: Self-Construal Priming Mirrors Cultural Differences in Judgment

    Wendi L. Gardner;Shira Gabriel;Angela Y. Lee

  • The pleasures and pains of distinct self-construals: The role of interdependence in regulatory focus.

    Angela Y. Lee;Jennifer L. Aaker;Wendi L. Gardner

  • Getting a Cue: The Need to Belong and Enhanced Sensitivity to Social Cues

    Cynthia L. Pickett;Wendi L. Gardner;Megan Knowles

  • Social Exclusion and Selective Memory: How the Need to belong Influences Memory for Social Events

    Wendi L. Gardner;Cynthia L. Pickett;Marilynn B. Brewer

  • Are there "his" and "hers" types of interdependence? The implications of gender differences in collective versus relational interdependence for affect, behavior, and cognition.

    Shira Gabriel;Wendi L. Gardner

  • Handbook of motivation science

    James Y. Shah;Wendi L. Gardner

  • Empathy as a cognitive inhibitor of interpersonal aggression

    Deborah R. Richardson;Georgina S. Hammock;Stephen M. Smith;Wendi Gardner

  • On the Outside Looking In: Loneliness and Social Monitoring:

    Wendi L. Gardner;Cynthia L. Pickett;Valerie Jefferis;Megan Knowles

  • When you and I are "we," you are not threatening: the role of self-expansion in social comparison.

    Wendi L. Gardner;Shira Gabriel;Laura Hochschild

  • Motivations for prevention or promotion following social exclusion: being rejected versus being ignored.

    Daniel C. Molden;Gale M. Lucas;Wendi L. Gardner;Kristy Dean

  • Who Am I Without You? The Influence of Romantic Breakup on the Self-Concept:

    Erica B. Slotter;Wendi L. Gardner;Eli J. Finkel

  • The Social Monitoring System: Enhanced Sensitivity to Social Cues as an Adaptive Response to Social Exclusion.

    Cynthia L. Pickett;Wendi L. Gardner

  • Bioelectrical echoes from evaluative categorizations: I. A late positive brain potential that varies as a function of trait negativity and extremity.

    John T. Cacioppo;Stephen L. Crites;Wendi L. Gardner;Gary G. Berntson

  • Attitudes to the Right: Evaluative Processing is Associated with Lateralized Late Positive Event-Related Brain Potentials

    John T. Cacioppo;Stephen L. Crites;Wendi L. Gardner

  • Benefits of Membership: The Activation and Amplification of Group Identities in Response to Social Rejection

    Megan L. Knowles;Megan L. Knowles;Wendi L. Gardner

  • Bioelectrical Echoes From Evaluative Categorization: II. A Late Positive Brain Potential That Varies as a Function of Attitude Registration Rather Than Attitude Report

    Stephen L. Crites;John T. Cacioppo;Wendi L. Gardner;Gary G. Berntson

  • Attitudes toward presidential candidates and political parties: Initial optimism, inertial first impressions, and a focus on flaws

    Allyson L. Holbrook;Jon A. Krosnick;Penny S. Visser;Wendi L. Gardner

Frequent Co-Authors

John T. Cacioppo
John T. Cacioppo University of Chicago
Daniel C. Molden
Daniel C. Molden Northwestern University
Gary G. Berntson
Gary G. Berntson The Ohio State University
Eli J. Finkel
Eli J. Finkel Northwestern University
Jennifer Aaker
Jennifer Aaker Stanford University
Marilynn B. Brewer
Marilynn B. Brewer The Ohio State University
David H. Uttal
David H. Uttal Northwestern University
Leigh Thompson
Leigh Thompson Northwestern University
Ying-yi Hong
Ying-yi Hong Chinese University of Hong Kong
Roy F. Baumeister
Roy F. Baumeister University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens the door to many rewarding online programs and specialized career pathways. One popular option is marriage and family therapy (MFT), a field that blends therapeutic skills with a strong emphasis on relationships and community support.

Requirements for becoming an MFT can vary significantly by location. For example, you can explore mft requirements in Atlanta or discover how to become an mft in Aurora to understand regional differences. Typically, licensure requires a master's degree in a relevant discipline, supervised clinical hours, and passing national or state exams.

Online education now offers more flexibility for earning these advanced degrees. Whether you are researching Austin mft education requirements or checking mft requirements in Bakersfield, many accredited programs blend online coursework with local internship opportunities.

By understanding each state’s specific requirements, students can better plan their educational path and future career as a mental health professional.

Best Scientists Citing Wendi L. Gardner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles