World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
46
Citations
4962
World Ranking
4721
National Ranking
71

Esa Koskela publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Esa Koskela sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 93 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Esa Koskela D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Esa Koskela sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Esa Koskela is a researcher affiliated with the University of Jyväskylä in Finland. Their scholarly activities focus primarily on Environmental Science and Medicine, with particular attention to subfields including Ecology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Molecular Biology, Infectious Diseases, and Parasitology.

The core research topics associated with Esa Koskela encompass:

  • Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Zoonotic diseases and public health
  • Gut microbiota and health
  • Vector-borne infectious diseases
  • Isotope Analysis in Ecology
  • Plant and animal studies
  • Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research

Esa Koskela has contributed to multiple peer-reviewed journals, with frequent publications in the following venues:

  • Oecologia
  • Molecular Ecology
  • Scientific Reports
  • Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences

Recent scholarly papers include:

  • Population cycles and outbreaks of small rodents: ten essential questions we still need to solve, 2020, Oecologia
  • Urban forest soils harbour distinct and more diverse communities of bacteria and fungi compared to less disturbed forest soils, 2022, Molecular Ecology
  • Rodent host population dynamics drive zoonotic Lyme Borreliosis and Orthohantavirus infections in humans in Northern Europe, 2021, Scientific Reports
  • Artificial selection for predatory behaviour results in dietary niche differentiation in an omnivorous mammal, 2022, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • Evolved high aerobic capacity has context-specific effects on gut microbiota, 2022, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution

Throughout their career, Esa Koskela has collaborated extensively with various researchers. Frequent co-authors include Tapio Mappes, Heikki Henttonen, Otso Huitu, Eva R. Kallio, and Paweł Koteja.

Best Publications

  • Attractiveness of women's body odors over the menstrual cycle: the role of oral contraceptives and receiver sex

    Seppo Kuukasjärvi;C. J. Peter Eriksson;Esa Koskela;Tapio Mappes

  • COST OF REPRODUCTION IN THE WILD: MANIPULATION OF REPRODUCTIVE EFFORT IN THE BANK VOLE

    Minna Koivula;Esa Koskela;Tapio Mappes;Tuula A. Oksanen

  • Territorial behaviour and reproductive success of bank vole Clethrionomys glareolus females.

    Esa Koskela;Tapio Mappes;Hannu Ylonen

  • Endemic hantavirus infection impairs the winter survival of its rodent host.

    Eva R. Kallio;Eva R. Kallio;Eva R. Kallio;Liina Voutilainen;Olli Vapalahti;Antti Vaheri

  • Cyclic hantavirus epidemics in humans--predicted by rodent host dynamics.

    Eva R. Kallio;Michael Begon;Heikki Henttonen;Esa Koskela

  • Nonlinear effects of climate on boreal rodent dynamics: mild winters do not negate high-amplitude cycles.

    Katri Korpela;Maria del Mar Delgado;Heikki Henttonen;Erkki Korpimäki

  • Population cycles and outbreaks of small rodents: ten essential questions we still need to solve

    Harry P. Andreassen;Janne Sundell;Fraucke Ecke;Stefan Halle

  • Testosterone‐Mediated Effects on Fitness‐Related Phenotypic Traits and Fitness

    Suzanne C. Mills;Alessandro Grapputo;Ilmari Jokinen;Esa Koskela

  • Maternal antibodies postpone hantavirus infection and enhance individual breeding success

    Eva R Kallio;Antti Poikonen;Antti Vaheri;Olli Vapalahti

  • Quantitative measure of sexual selection with respect to the operational sex ratio: a comparison of selection indices

    Suzanne C Mills;Alessandro Grapputo;Esa Koskela;Tapio Mappes

  • Reproductive Costs and Litter Size in the Bank Vole

    Tapio Mappes;Esa Koskela;Hannu Ylonen

  • Does risk of predation by mammalian predators affect the spacing behaviour of rodents? Two large-scale experiments.

    P Jonsson;E Koskela;T Mappes

  • Limitation of reproductive success by food availability and litter size in the bank vole, Clethrionomys glareolus

    Esa Koskela;Pernilla Jonsson;Tommi Hartikainen;Tapio Mappes

  • Fitness trade-offs mediated by immunosuppression costs in a small mammal.

    Suzanne C. Mills;Suzanne C. Mills;Alessandro Grapputo;Ilmari Jokinen;Esa Koskela

  • Suppressed breeding in the field vole (Microtus agrestis): an adaptation to cyclically fluctuating predation risk

    Esa Koskela;Hannu YlÖnen

  • Offspring growth, survival and reproductive success in the bank vole: a litter size manipulation experiment.

    Esa Koskela

  • Breeding Suppression in Voles under Predation Risk of Small Mustelids: Laboratory or Methodological Artifact?

    Tapio Mappes;Esa Koskela;Hannu Ylönen

  • Negative frequency-dependent selection of sexually antagonistic alleles in Myodes glareolus.

    Mikael Mokkonen;Hanna Kokko;Esa Koskela;Jussi Lehtonen;Jussi Lehtonen

  • Determinants of reproductive success in voles: space use in relation to food and litter size manipulation

    Pernilla Jonsson;Tommi Hartikainen;Esa Koskela;Tapio Mappes

  • Hantavirus infections in fluctuating host populations: the role of maternal antibodies

    Eva R. Kallio;Michael Begon;Heikki Henttonen;Esa Koskela

  • Density-dependent vole damage in silviculture and associated economic losses at a nationwide scale

    Otso Huitu;Nuutti Kiljunen;Erkki Korpimäki;Esa Koskela

Frequent Co-Authors

Tapio Mappes
Tapio Mappes University of Jyväskylä
Suzanne C. Mills
Suzanne C. Mills École Pratique des Hautes Études
Phillip C. Watts
Phillip C. Watts University of Jyväskylä
Heikki Henttonen
Heikki Henttonen Natural Resources Institute Finland
Hannu Ylönen
Hannu Ylönen University of Jyväskylä
Olli Vapalahti
Olli Vapalahti University of Helsinki
Erkki Korpimäki
Erkki Korpimäki University of Turku
Antti Vaheri
Antti Vaheri University of Helsinki
Otso Ovaskainen
Otso Ovaskainen University of Jyväskylä
Grant R. Singleton
Grant R. Singleton University of Greenwich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution in the USA can open doors to a wide array of dynamic career paths, including environmental research, conservation biology, and data analysis. As the field increasingly intersects with public health and policy, many students consider enhancing their qualifications with advanced online degrees.

For those with a background in nursing or healthcare, there are opportunities to shift into advanced roles via bridge programs. For instance, adn to np programs online make it possible for registered nurses with an associate degree to pursue a nurse practitioner career without leaving their job. Meanwhile, those with a bachelor’s in another field can explore msn direct entry programs online designed for non-nurses seeking a quick transition into advanced nursing roles.

Comparing programs is key—consider school options like wgu vs chamberlain to find the best fit for your schedule and learning preferences. Affordability is also important; check out resources for the bsn to msn online pathway to maximize your return on investment while advancing your career in science and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Esa Koskela

Trending Scientists