World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jan Havlíček

Jan Havlíček

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
45
Citations
8372
World Ranking
6689
National Ranking
3

Jan Havlíček publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Havlíček sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 159 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jan Havlíček D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Havlíček sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jan Havlíček is affiliated with Charles University in the Czech Republic. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Neuroscience, with a focus on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sensory Systems, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

Their work covers several key research topics including Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior, Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies, Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment, Attachment and Relationship Dynamics, Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies, Animal Behavior and Reproduction, and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques.

Jan Havlíček's publications have appeared frequently in the following venues:

  • Evolution and Human Behavior
  • Archives of Sexual Behavior
  • Human Ethology
  • Scientific Reports
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences

Among recent papers authored by or including Jan Havlíček are:

  • Major histocompatibility complex-associated odour preferences and human mate choice: near and far horizons, 2020, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences

Other notable recent papers within their collaborative network include:

  • More Than Smell-COVID-19 Is Associated With Severe Impairment of Smell, Taste, and Chemesthesis, 2020, Chemical Senses
  • How and why patterns of sexual dimorphism in human faces vary across the world, 2021, Scientific Reports
  • Acute fatigue affects reaction times and reaction consistency in Mixed Martial Arts fighters, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • Human olfactory communication: current challenges and future prospects, 2020, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences

Jan Havlíček has collaborated extensively with several frequent coauthors, including:

  • S. Craig Roberts
  • Jitka Fialová
  • Vít Třebický
  • Jaroslava Varella Valentová
  • Dagmar Schwambergová

Best Publications

  • More Than Smell-COVID-19 Is Associated With Severe Impairment of Smell, Taste, and Chemesthesis.

    Valentina Parma;Kathrin Ohla;Maria G Veldhuizen;Masha Y Niv

  • Female facial attractiveness increases during the fertile phase of the menstrual cycle

    S. Craig Roberts;Jan Havlicek;Jaroslav Flegr;Martina Hruskova

  • MHC-correlated mate choice in humans: A review

    Jan Havlicek;S. Craig Roberts

  • Women's preference for dominant male odour: effects of menstrual cycle and relationship status

    Jan Havlicek;S. Craig Roberts;Jaroslav Flegr

  • Increased risk of traffic accidents in subjects with latent toxoplasmosis: a retrospective case-control study.

    Jaroslav Flegr;Jan Havlícek;Petr Kodym;Marek Malý

  • Decrease of psychomotor performance in subjects with latent 'asymptomatic' toxoplasmosis.

    J. Havlíček;Z. Gašová;Andrew Paul Smith;K. Zvára

  • Non-Advertized does not Mean Concealed: Body Odour Changes across the Human Menstrual Cycle

    Jan Havlicek;Radka Dvorakova;Ludek Bartos;Jaroslav Flegr

  • Decreased level of psychobiological factor novelty seeking and lower intelligence in men latently infected with the protozoan parasite Toxoplasma gondii Dopamine, a missing link between schizophrenia and toxoplasmosis?

    Jaroslav Flegr;Marek Preiss;Jiřı́ Klose;Jan Havlı́ček

  • Distinguishing between Perceiver and Wearer Effects in Clothing Color-Associated Attributions

    S. Craig Roberts;Roy C. Owen;Jan Havlicek

  • Gender differences in behavioural changes induced by latent toxoplasmosis

    Jitka Lindová;Martina Novotná;Jan Havlíček;Eva Jozífková

  • The Effect of Meat Consumption on Body Odor Attractiveness

    Jan Havlicek;Pavlina Lenochova

  • Methods of Human Body Odor Sampling: The Effect of Freezing

    Pavlina Lenochova;S. Craig Roberts;Jan Havlicek

  • DiVinE 3.0: an explicit-state model checker for multithreaded c & c++ programs

    Jiří Barnat;Luboš Brim;Vojtěch Havel;Jan Havlíček

  • Increased incidence of traffic accidents in Toxoplasma -infected military drivers and protective effect RhD molecule revealed by a large-scale prospective cohort study

    Jaroslav Flegr;Jiří Klose;Martina Novotná;Miroslava Berenreitterová

  • He sees, she smells? Male and female reports of sensory reliance in mate choice and non-mate choice contexts

    Jan Havlicek;Tamsin K. Saxton;S. Craig Roberts;Eva Jozifkova

  • Patterns of MHC-dependent mate selection in humans and nonhuman primates: a meta-analysis.

    J. C. Winternitz;J. C. Winternitz;J. L. Abbate;J. L. Abbate;E. Huchard;J. Havlíček

  • Pogamut 3 Can Assist Developers in Building AI (Not Only) for Their Videogame Agents

    Jakub Gemrot;Rudolf Kadlec;Michal Bída;Ondřej Burkert

  • Perceived Aggressiveness Predicts Fighting Performance in Mixed-Martial-Arts Fighters

    Vít Trebicky;Jan Havlícek;S Craig Roberts;Anthony C Little

  • Probable neuroimmunological link between Toxoplasma and cytomegalovirus infections and personality changes in the human host

    Martina Novotná;Jitka Hanusova;Jiří Klose;Marek Preiss

  • Toxoplasma and reaction time: role of toxoplasmosis in the origin, preservation and geographical distribution of Rh blood group polymorphism

    M. Novotná;J. Havlíček;Andrew Paul Smith;P. Kolbeková

Frequent Co-Authors

S. Craig Roberts
S. Craig Roberts University of Stirling
Anthony C. Little
Anthony C. Little University of Bath
Agnieszka Sorokowska
Agnieszka Sorokowska University of Wrocław
Benedict C. Jones
Benedict C. Jones University of Strathclyde
Lisa M. DeBruine
Lisa M. DeBruine University of Glasgow
Marion Petrie
Marion Petrie Newcastle University
Karl Grammer
Karl Grammer University of Vienna
Thomas Hummel
Thomas Hummel TU Dresden
Katarzyna Pisanski
Katarzyna Pisanski French National Centre for Scientific Research
Andrew Paul Smith
Andrew Paul Smith Cardiff University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in the field of psychology, exploring related online degrees can open doors to rewarding career pathways such as social work, counseling, or human services. Many students with a psychology background consider becoming social workers, but it’s important to understand the degree requirements in your state.

For example, social worker degree requirements in Michigan specify certain bachelor’s or master’s level qualifications. Similarly, those researching Minnesota education requirements for social workers will discover specific licensing steps and coursework are needed.

Requirements also vary in the South and Midwest. If you want to know about the degree needed to be a social worker in Mississippi, you'll find region-specific guidelines involving clinical hours and exams. Missouri also has its unique social worker degree requirements in Missouri.

With the flexibility of online programs, pursuing a psychology or social work-related degree is more accessible than ever. Make sure to review state requirements as you plan your educational and professional journey.

Best Scientists Citing Jan Havlíček

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles