World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
47
Citations
15821
World Ranking
6035
National Ranking
3276

Martie G. Haselton publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martie G. Haselton sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 109 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Martie G. Haselton D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martie G. Haselton sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martie G. Haselton is affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on fields within the social sciences and psychology, with a significant emphasis on evolutionary psychology and human behavior.

The scientist has contributed to various subfields including sociology and political science, social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, gender studies, and education. This interdisciplinary approach highlights the breadth of their work across multiple domains of human behavior and social interaction.

Haselton's main research topics encompass:

  • Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Social Representations and Identity

Frequent collaborators of Martie G. Haselton include Steven W. Gangestad, Melissa R. Fales, A. Janet Tomiyama, Tran Van Dinh, and Danny Rahal. These collaborations reflect ongoing partnerships in their research endeavors.

Haselton's work has been published in a number of academic journals. The most frequent publication venues are Psychological Inquiry and Preprints.org, with other contributions appearing in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Perspectives on Psychological Science, and Current Opinion in Psychology.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Haselton involve various areas related to human nature, psychology, and social behavior. Selected notable works include:

  • The pandemic exposes human nature: 10 evolutionary insights, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Psychological Science in the Wake of COVID-19: Social, Methodological, and Metascientific Considerations, 2021, Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • Why women choose divorce: An evolutionary perspective, 2021, Current Opinion in Psychology
  • "Fast" women? The effects of childhood environments on women's developmental timing, mating strategies, and reproductive outcomes, 2021, Evolution and Human Behavior
  • Strange Bedfellows: The Alliance Theory of Political Belief Systems, 2023, Psychological Inquiry

Best Publications

  • The Evolution of Cognitive Bias

    Martie G. Haselton;Daniel Nettle;Paul W. Andrews

  • Error management theory: a new perspective on biases in cross-sex mind reading.

    Martie G. Haselton;David M. Buss

  • Adaptations, exaptations, and spandrels.

    David M. Buss;Martie G. Haselton;Todd K. Shackelford;April L. Bleske

  • The Paranoid Optimist: An Integrative Evolutionary Model of Cognitive Biases:

    Martie G. Haselton;Daniel Nettle

  • Conditional expression of women's desires and men's mate guarding across the ovulatory cycle.

    Martie G. Haselton;Steven W. Gangestad

  • Desiring the Muscular Ideal: Men's Body Satisfaction in the United States, Ukraine, and Ghana

    David A. Frederick;Gregory M. Buchanan;Leila Sadehgi-Azar;Letitia Anne Peplau

  • Evolutionary Foundations of Cultural Variation: Evoked Culture and Mate Preferences

    Steven W. Gangestad;Martie G. Haselton;David M. Buss

  • Why Is Muscularity Sexy? Tests of the Fitness Indicator Hypothesis

    David A. Frederick;Martie G. Haselton

  • Ovulatory shifts in human female ornamentation: near ovulation, women dress to impress.

    Martie G. Haselton;Mina Mortezaie;Elizabeth G. Pillsworth;April Bleske-Rechek

  • Do women’s mate preferences change across the ovulatory cycle? A meta-analytic review.

    Kelly Gildersleeve;Martie G. Haselton;Melissa R. Fales

  • The evolution of error: error management, cognitive constraints, and adaptive decision-making biases

    Dominic D.P. Johnson;Daniel T. Blumstein;James H. Fowler;Martie G. Haselton

  • Changes in Women's Choice of Dress Across the Ovulatory Cycle: Naturalistic and Laboratory Task-Based Evidence

    Kristina M. Durante;Norman P. Li;Martie G. Haselton

  • Women's fertility across the cycle increases the short-term attractiveness of creative intelligence.

    Martie G. Haselton;Geoffrey F. Miller

  • Male sexual attractiveness predicts differential ovulatory shifts in female extra-pair attraction and male mate retention

    Elizabeth G. Pillsworth;Martie G. Haselton

  • The evolution of jealousy.

    David M. Buss;Martie Haselton

  • Adaptive rationality: An evolutionary perspective on cognitive bias

    Martie G. Haselton;Gregory A. Bryant;Andreas Wilke;David A. Frederick

  • Ovulatory shifts in female sexual desire.

    Elizabeth G. Pillsworth;Martie G. Haselton;David M. Buss

  • Do representations of male muscularity differ in men's and women's magazines?

    David A. Frederick;Daniel M.T. Fessler;Martie G. Haselton

  • Sex, Lies, and Strategic Interference: The Psychology of Deception Between the Sexes

    Martie G. Haselton;David M. Buss;Viktor Oubaid;Alois Angleitner

  • The sexual overperception bias: Evidence of a systematic bias in men from a survey of naturally occurring events.

    Martie G. Haselton

Frequent Co-Authors

David M. Buss
David M. Buss The University of Texas at Austin
David A. Frederick
David A. Frederick Chapman University
Steven W. Gangestad
Steven W. Gangestad University of New Mexico
William von Hippel
William von Hippel University of Queensland
Daniel M. T. Fessler
Daniel M. T. Fessler University of California, Los Angeles
Joseph P. Forgas
Joseph P. Forgas University of New South Wales
Gregory A. Bryant
Gregory A. Bryant University of California, Los Angeles
Geoffrey F. Miller
Geoffrey F. Miller University of New Mexico
Todd K. Shackelford
Todd K. Shackelford Oakland University
Kerri L. Johnson
Kerri L. Johnson University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens the door to a wide range of dynamic career pathways. Understanding the differences between various professional roles is crucial for those considering an advanced degree. For example, the distinction between clinical therapist vs clinical psychologist impacts your scope of practice, education requirements, and licensing. Carefully researching these roles can help you choose the right program for your goals.

Career possibilities after graduation are both diverse and rewarding. Those earning a doctorate can enjoy strong job prospects and impressive compensation—learn more about the phd in psychology salary to see long-term earning potential. Sport psychology is another growing area; discover the average salary for a master's in sports psychology degree and the types of jobs available in this field.

Organizational psychology is also a highly sought-after specialty, helping companies improve employee well-being and productivity. If you want to know what is an organizational psychologist and what their typical responsibilities are, be sure to review this distinctive career option.

Best Scientists Citing Martie G. Haselton

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles