World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
William von Hippel

William von Hippel

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
49
Citations
12370
World Ranking
5604
National Ranking
322

William von Hippel publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William von Hippel sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 148 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

William von Hippel D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William von Hippel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

William von Hippel is affiliated with the University of Queensland in Australia. Their research primarily spans psychology and social sciences, with a significant focus on subfields such as sociology and political science, experimental and cognitive psychology, social psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and safety research.

The range of main topics explored by von Hippel includes:

  • Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies

Among recent published papers attributed to von Hippel's collaborations are:

  • Prosocial motives underlie scientific censorship by scientists: A perspective and research agenda, 2023, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Meaning and Evolution: Why Nature Selected Human Minds to Use Meaning, 2020, Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture
  • Determinants of Social Cognitive Aging: Predicting Resilience and Risk, 2022, Annual Review of Psychology
  • Eliciting false insights with semantic priming, 2022, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • Irrelevant insights make worldviews ring true, 2022, Scientific Reports

Frequent coauthors in von Hippel's work include:

  • Roy F. Baumeister
  • Connie J. Clark
  • Komi Frey
  • David M. Buss
  • Stephen J. Ceci

William von Hippel's publications regularly appear in noted academic venues such as:

  • Progress in Community Health Partnerships
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • Psychological Science

Best Publications

  • Undergraduate Student-Faculty Research Partnerships Affect Student Retention

    Biren A. Nagda;Sandra R. Gregerman;John Jonides;William von Hippel

  • The evolution and psychology of self-deception

    William von Hippel;Robert Trivers

  • Reflections on self-deception

    William von Hippel;Robert Trivers

  • Clinical assessment of social cognitive function in neurological disorders

    Julie D. Henry;William von Hippel;Pascal Molenberghs;Teresa Lee

  • Interacting with sexist men triggers social identity threat among female engineers.

    Christine Logel;Gregory M. Walton;Steven J. Spencer;Emma C. Iserman

  • The Social Outcast : Ostracism, Social Exclusion, Rejection, and Bullying

    Kipling D. Williams;Joseph P. Forgas;William Von Hippel

  • Mapping cognitive structures and processes through verbal content: The thought-listing technique.

    John T. Cacioppo;William von Hippel;John M. Ernst

  • The Presence of an Attractive Woman Elevates Testosterone and Physical Risk Taking in Young Men

    Richard Ronay;William von Hippel

  • The Linguistic Intergroup Bias As an Implicit Indicator of Prejudice

    William von Hippel;Denise Sekaquaptewa;Patrick Vargas

  • Empathy and social functioning in late adulthood

    Phoebe E. Bailey;Julie D. Henry;William Von Hippel

  • Stereotypic explanatory bias: Implicit stereotyping as a predictor of discrimination

    Denise Sekaquaptewa;Penelope Espinoza;Mischa Thompson;Patrick Vargas

  • On The Role Of Encoding Processes In Stereotype Maintenance

    William von Hippel;Denise Sekaquaptewa;Patrick Vargas

  • Stereotyping Against Your Will: The Role of Inhibitory Ability in Stereotyping and Prejudice among the Elderly

    William von Hippel;Lisa A. Silver;Molly E. Lynch

  • Hearts and Minds: The Priority of Affective Versus Cognitive Factors in Person Perception

    Kari Edwards;William von Hippel

  • “That Is Bloody Revolting!” Inhibitory Control of Thoughts Better Left Unsaid

    William von Hippel;Karen Gonsalkorale

  • Perceptions of discriminatory treatment by staff as predictors of drug treatment completion: utility of a mixed methods approach.

    Loren Brener;William Von Hippel;Courtney Von Hippel;Ilyse Resnick

  • Darwinian Grandparenting: Preferential Investment in More Certain Kin

    Simon M. Laham;Karen Gonsalkorale;William von Hippel

  • Coping with stereotype threat: denial as an impression management strategy.

    William von Hippel;Courtney von Hippel;Leanne Conway;Kristopher J. Preacher

  • The role of physician and nurse attitudes in the health care of injecting drug users

    Loren Brener;William Von Hippel;Susan Kippax;Kristopher J. Preacher

  • Age, race, and implicit prejudice: Using process dissociation to separate the underlying components

    Brandon D. Stewart;William von Hippel;Gabriel A. Radvansky

  • Inhibitory effect of schematic processing on perceptual encoding.

    William von Hippel;John Jonides;James L. Hilton;Sowmya Narayan

  • Psychology of self-regulation: Cognitive, affective, and motivational processes.

    Joseph P. Forgas;Roy F. Baumeister;Dianne M. Tice

Frequent Co-Authors

Joseph P. Forgas
Joseph P. Forgas University of New South Wales
Kipling D. Williams
Kipling D. Williams Purdue University West Lafayette
Julie D. Henry
Julie D. Henry University of Queensland
Martie G. Haselton
Martie G. Haselton University of California, Los Angeles
Gabriel A. Radvansky
Gabriel A. Radvansky University of Notre Dame
Fiona Kate Barlow
Fiona Kate Barlow University of Queensland
Thomas F. Denson
Thomas F. Denson University of New South Wales
David M. Buss
David M. Buss The University of Texas at Austin
Steven J. Spencer
Steven J. Spencer The Ohio State University
Roy F. Baumeister
Roy F. Baumeister University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology can open doors to many rewarding career pathways, especially in the rapidly growing field of mental health counseling. Whether you’re interested in clinical practice, school counseling, or social services, an online psychology degree provides the flexibility to balance studies with other responsibilities.

Each state has unique requirements for becoming a mental health counselor. For example, you can find specific guidance on Austin mental health counselor education requirements, which outline the coursework and licensure steps needed in Texas. If you’re considering California, see the details for Bakersfield mental health counselor education requirements. Similarly, requirements vary for other cities and states, such as the process to become a mental health counselor in Baltimore, Maryland, or meeting the mental health counselor requirements in Boise, Idaho.

No matter where you plan to practice, gaining a solid foundation in psychological principles and understanding local licensure standards is crucial for a successful career in mental health counseling.

Best Scientists Citing William von Hippel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles