World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
45
Citations
8471
World Ranking
7192
National Ranking
429

Oliver Faust publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oliver Faust sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 126 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Oliver Faust D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oliver Faust sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Oliver Faust is affiliated with Sheffield Hallam University in the United Kingdom. Their primary research area is Medicine, with a focus spanning several subfields including Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Artificial Intelligence, and Biomedical Engineering.

Their work covers a variety of topics such as:

  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • AI in cancer detection
  • Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research

Oliver Faust has published extensively in notable venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Diagnostics
  • Journal of Applied Biomedicine
  • Computers in Biology and Medicine

Their recent papers include:

  • Transfer learning techniques for medical image analysis: A review, 2021, Journal of Applied Biomedicine
  • Comprehensive electrocardiographic diagnosis based on deep learning, 2020, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
  • Automated ASD detection using hybrid deep lightweight features extracted from EEG signals, 2021, Computers in Biology and Medicine
  • Automated Detection of Sleep Stages Using Deep Learning Techniques: A Systematic Review of the Last Decade (2010-2020), 2020, Applied Sciences
  • Automated blast cell detection for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia diagnosis, 2021, Biomedical Signal Processing and Control

Collaboration is a significant element of Oliver Faust's research, with frequent coauthors including:

  • U. Rajendra Acharya
  • Prabal Datta Barua
  • Edward J. Ciaccio
  • Subrata Chakraborty
  • Filippo Molinari

Best Publications

  • Deep learning for healthcare applications based on physiological signals: A review.

    Oliver Faust;Yuki Hagiwara;Tan Jen Hong;Oh Shu Lih

  • Wavelet-based EEG processing for computer-aided seizure detection and epilepsy diagnosis.

    Oliver Faust;U. Rajendra Acharya;Hojjat Adeli;Amir Adeli

  • Non-linear analysis of EEG signals at various sleep stages

    U Rajendra Acharya;Oliver Faust;N. Kannathal;TjiLeng Chua

  • Algorithms for the Automated Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy Using Digital Fundus Images: A Review

    Oliver Faust;U Rajendra Acharya;E. Y. Ng;Kwan-Hoong Ng

  • Automated detection of atrial fibrillation using long short-term memory network with RR interval signals

    Oliver Faust;Alex Shenfield;Murtadha Kareem;Tan Ru San

  • Comprehensive electrocardiographic diagnosis based on deep learning.

    Oh Shu Lih;V Jahmunah;Tan Ru San;Edward J Ciaccio

  • Linear and nonlinear analysis of normal and CAD-affected heart rate signals

    U. Rajendra Acharya;Oliver Faust;Vinitha Sree;G. Swapna

  • Automatic identification of epileptic and background EEG signals using frequency domain parameters.

    Oliver Faust;U. Rajendra Acharya;Lim Choo Min;Bernhard H. C. Sputh

  • A review of automated sleep stage scoring based on physiological signals for the new millennia.

    Oliver Faust;Hajar Razaghi;Ragab Barika;Edward J Ciaccio

  • Automated identification of normal and diabetes heart rate signals using nonlinear measures

    U. Rajendra Acharya;Oliver Faust;Nahrizul Adib Kadri;Jasjit S. Suri

  • Analysis of EEG signals during epileptic and alcoholic states using AR modeling techniques

    O. Faust;R.U. Acharya;A.R. Allen;C.M. Lin

  • Cost-Effective and Non-Invasive Automated Benign & Malignant Thyroid Lesion Classification in 3D Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Using Combination of Wavelets and Textures: A Class of ThyroScan™ Algorithms

    U. R. Acharya;O. Faust;S. V. Sree;Filippo Molinari

  • ThyroScreen system: High resolution ultrasound thyroid image characterization into benign and malignant classes using novel combination of texture and discrete wavelet transform

    U. Rajendra Acharya;Oliver Faust;S Vinitha Sree;Filippo Molinari

  • Symptomatic vs. Asymptomatic Plaque Classification in Carotid Ultrasound

    Rajendra U. Acharya;Oliver Faust;A. P. Alvin;S. Vinitha Sree

  • Automated ASD detection using hybrid deep lightweight features extracted from EEG signals.

    Mehmet Baygin;Sengul Dogan;Turker Tuncer;Prabal Datta Barua

  • Application of infrared thermography in computer aided diagnosis.

    Oliver Faust;U. Rajendra Acharya;E.Y.K. Ng;Tan Jen Hong

  • DEPRESSION DIAGNOSIS SUPPORT SYSTEM BASED ON EEG SIGNAL ENTROPIES

    Oliver Faust;Peng Chuan Alvin Ang;Subha D. Puthankattil;Paul K. Joseph

  • Nonlinear Dynamics Measures for Automated EEG-Based Sleep Stage Detection.

    U. Rajendra Acharya;Shreya Bhat;Oliver Faust;Hojjat Adeli

  • Automated detection of sleep apnea from electrocardiogram signals using nonlinear parameters.

    U Rajendra Acharya;Eric Chern-Pin Chua;Oliver Faust;Teik-Cheng Lim

  • Automated Detection of Sleep Stages Using Deep Learning Techniques: A Systematic Review of the Last Decade (2010–2020)

    Hui Wen Loh;Chui Ping Ooi;Jahmunah Vicnesh;Shu Lih Oh

  • Analysis of cardiac signals using spatial filling index and time-frequency domain

    Oliver Faust;Rajendra Acharya U;SM Krishnan;Lim Choo Min

  • Nonlinear Analysis of Physiological Signals: A Review

    Oliver Faust;Muralidhar G. Bairy

Frequent Co-Authors

U. Rajendra Acharya
U. Rajendra Acharya University of Southern Queensland
Jasjit S. Suri
Jasjit S. Suri University of Idaho
S. Vinitha Sree
S. Vinitha Sree Nanyang Technological University
Filippo Molinari
Filippo Molinari Polytechnic University of Turin
Joel En Wei Koh
Joel En Wei Koh Ngee Ann Polytechnic
Shu Lih Oh
Shu Lih Oh Ngee Ann Polytechnic
Teik-Cheng Lim
Teik-Cheng Lim Singapore University of Social Sciences
Eddie Y. K. Ng
Eddie Y. K. Ng Nanyang Technological University
Hojjat Adeli
Hojjat Adeli The Ohio State University
Hamido Fujita
Hamido Fujita University of Technology Malaysia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees related to Computer Science can open up a wide range of career opportunities in technology and STEM fields. Many students choose programs that offer strong technical skills alongside flexibility and affordability. For instance, an online physics degree builds analytical abilities that are highly valued in software development and engineering roles.

Another option is pursuing a data scientist degree. Data science is experiencing significant growth, and graduates are often in demand across industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology. For those interested in hardware and systems, an online bachelor’s in electrical engineering can lead to roles in electronics, embedded systems, and more.

In addition to full degrees, students and professionals may benefit from pursuing easy licenses and certifications to get. These credentials can help boost employability or provide a quick career change, especially in IT and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Oliver Faust

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles