World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
51
Citations
11904
World Ranking
5178
National Ranking
2845

Gabriel A. Radvansky publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gabriel A. Radvansky sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 154 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Gabriel A. Radvansky D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gabriel A. Radvansky sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gabriel A. Radvansky is affiliated with the University of Notre Dame in the United States. Their research predominantly spans the fields of neuroscience and psychology, with a focus on cognitive neuroscience, developmental and educational psychology, and experimental and cognitive psychology. The scientist's work also intersects with areas such as artificial intelligence and education.

The main topics covered in Radvansky's research include memory processes and influences, memory and neural mechanisms, child and animal learning development, cognitive functions and memory, domain adaptation and few-shot learning, topic modeling, and the neurobiology of language and bilingualism.

Gabriel A. Radvansky has contributed scholarly articles to a variety of publication venues. Their publications frequently appear in:

  • Memory
  • Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition

Some of the recent research publications under their authorship include:

  • A new look at memory retention and forgetting, 2022, Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition
  • A novel study: long-lasting event memory, 2021, Memory
  • Degree of learning and linear forgetting, 2021, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
  • Spoken narrative comprehension for young adult listeners: effects of competing voices and noise, 2021, International Journal of Audiology
  • Propositional density: cognitive impairment and aging, 2024, Frontiers in Psychology

Collaboration is a notable aspect of Gabriel A. Radvansky's scientific activity. Frequent co-authors include Abigail C. Doolen, Dani Parra, Chaimae Harrag, Abdelkader Sabil, and Manuel Célio Conceição. These collaborations have resulted in multiple joint publications across interdisciplinary topics.

Best Publications

  • Situation Models in Language Comprehension and Memory

    Rolf A. Zwaan;Gabriel A. Radvansky

  • Studies of directed forgetting in older adults.

    Rose T. Zacks;Gabriel Radvansky;Lynn Hasher

  • Situation models in language comprehension and memory.

    Unknown

  • Walking through doorways causes forgetting: situation models and experienced space.

    Gabriel A. Radvansky;David E. Copeland

  • Event Boundaries in Memory and Cognition.

    Gabriel A Radvansky;Jeffrey M Zacks

  • Constructing Multidimensional Situation Models During Reading

    Rolf A. Zwaan;Gabriel A. Radvansky;Amy E. Hilliard;Jacqueline M. Curiel

  • The comprehension and validation of social information.

    Robert S. Wyer;Gabriel A. Radvansky

  • Studies of directed forgetting in older adults.

    Unknown

  • Situation models and aging.

    Radvansky Ga;Curiel Jm;Zwaan Ra;Copeland De

  • Across the Event Horizon

    Gabriel A. Radvansky

  • Mental models and the fan effect.

    Gabriel A. Radvansky;Rose T. Zacks

  • Walking through Doorways Causes Forgetting: Further Explorations:

    Gabriel A. Radvansky;Sabine A. Krawietz;Andrea K. Tamplin

  • Coping with stereotype threat: denial as an impression management strategy.

    William von Hippel;Courtney von Hippel;Leanne Conway;Kristopher J. Preacher

  • Age deficits in retrieval: the fan effect.

    Linda Gerard;Rose T. Zacks;Lynn Hasher;Gabriel A. Radvansky

  • Age, race, and implicit prejudice: Using process dissociation to separate the underlying components

    Brandon D. Stewart;William von Hippel;Gabriel A. Radvansky

  • Event perception: Event perception

    Gabriel A. Radvansky;Jeffrey M. Zacks

  • The Fate of Completed Goal Information in Narrative Comprehension

    Mark F. Lutz;Gabriel A. Radvansky

  • Retrieval from temporally organized situation models.

    Gabriel A. Radvansky;Rolf A. Zwaan;Todd Federico;Nancy Franklin

  • The Influence of Functional Relations on Spatial Term Selection

    Laura A. Carlson-Radvansky;Gabriel A. Radvansky

  • Memory retrieval and suppression: The inhibition of situation models

    Gabriel A. Radvansky

  • Aging and situation model processing

    Gabriel A. Radvansky;Katinka Dijkstra

  • Mental Model Organization

    Gabriel A. Radvansky;Daniel H. Spieler;Rose T. Zacks

Frequent Co-Authors

Sidney K. D'Mello
Sidney K. D'Mello University of Colorado Boulder
Jeffrey M. Zacks
Jeffrey M. Zacks Washington University in St. Louis
Rolf A. Zwaan
Rolf A. Zwaan Erasmus University Rotterdam
Rose T. Zacks
Rose T. Zacks Michigan State University
William von Hippel
William von Hippel University of Queensland
Lynn Hasher
Lynn Hasher University of Toronto
Joseph P. Magliano
Joseph P. Magliano Georgia State University
Robert S. Wyer
Robert S. Wyer University of Cincinnati
Karl K. Szpunar
Karl K. Szpunar Toronto Metropolitan University
Darcia Narvaez
Darcia Narvaez University of Notre Dame

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology often leads students to consider related fields such as social work. With the rise of online education, more flexible and accessible programs are available than ever before. These programs can help you start or advance your career while balancing life’s other commitments.

If you’re seeking a fast-tracked entry into social work, several fastest online social work programs in Tennessee offer accelerated options so you can graduate sooner. For those who are budget-conscious, the affordable online social work bachelor's programs in Pennsylvania are excellent choices, providing rigorous training without a huge financial burden.

Many students across the country are also considering the most affordable online bachelor's in social work degree programs in America to maximize value and flexibility. For those located in the Pacific Northwest, be sure to explore affordable online social work programs in Boise for regionally accessible learning opportunities.

Whether your goal is direct counseling, social services, or research, these online programs can help you unlock diverse career pathways closely aligned with psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Gabriel A. Radvansky

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles