World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
92
Citations
27503
World Ranking
1038
National Ranking
31

Marco Trabucchi publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marco Trabucchi sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 730 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Marco Trabucchi D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marco Trabucchi sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Sensory Impairment and Quality of Life in a Community Elderly Population

    Corrado Carabellese;Ildebrando Appollonio;Renzo Rozzini;Angela Bianchetti

  • ROLE OF BRAIN ALLOPREGNANOLONE IN THE PLASTICITY OF GAMMA -AMINOBUTYRIC ACID TYPE A RECEPTOR IN RAT BRAIN DURING PREGNANCY AND AFTER DELIVERY

    A. Concas;M. C. Mostallino;P. Porcu;P. Follesa

  • Focussed microwave radiation: a technique to minimize post mortem changes of cyclic nucleotides, dopa and choline and to preserve brain morphology

    Guidotti A;Cheney Dl;Trabucchi M;Doteuchi M

  • Efficacy of cognitive rehabilitation in patients with mild cognitive impairment treated with cholinesterase inhibitors

    Luca Rozzini;Daniela Costardi;Barbara Vicini Chilovi;Simone Franzoni

  • Behavioral syndromes in Alzheimer's disease: description and correlates.

    Giovanni B. Frisoni;Luca Rozzini;Alessandra Gozzetti;Giuliano Binetti

  • Executive dysfunction in early Alzheimer's disease

    G Binetti;E Magni;A Padovani;S F Cappa

  • Outcomes of a computer-based cognitive rehabilitation program on Alzheimer's disease patients compared with those on patients affected by mild cognitive impairment

    Giovanna Cipriani;Angelo Bianchetti;Marco Trabucchi

  • Clinical Presentation of COVID19 in Dementia Patients

    Unknown

  • Hippocampus and entorhinal cortex in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer’s disease: a morphometric MRI study

    Mikko P. Laakso;Giovanni B. Frisoni;Mervi Könönen;Mia Mikkonen

  • Dopamine receptors: Pharmacological and anatomical evidences indicate that two distinct dopamine receptor populations are present in rat striatum

    L. Garau;S. Govoni;E. Stefanini;M. Trabucchi

  • Effects of Sensory Aids on the Quality of Life and Mortality of Elderly People: A Multivariate Analysis

    Ildebrando Appollonio;Corrado Carabellese;Lodovico Frattola;Marco Trabucchi

  • "Delirium Day": A nationwide point prevalence study of delirium in older hospitalized patients using an easy standardized diagnostic tool

    Giuseppe Bellelli;Alessandro Morandi;Simona G Di Santo;Andrea Mazzone

  • Object and action naming in Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia

    Stefano F. Cappa;G. Binetti;A. Pezzini;A. Padovani

  • Procedural memory stimulation in Alzheimer's disease ; impact of a training programme

    O. Zanetti;G. Binetti;E. Magni;L. Rozzini

  • Conversion of amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment to dementia of Alzheimer type is independent to memory deterioration.

    Luca Rozzini;Barbara Vicini Chilovi;Marta Conti;Erik Bertoletti

  • Sulpiride: a study of the effects on dopamine receptors in rat neostriatum and limbic forebrain.

    M. Trabucchi;R. Longoni;P. Fresia;P.F. Spano

  • In vivo inhibition of striatal acetylcholine turnover by L-DOPA, apomorphine and (+)-amphetamine

    M. Trabucchi;D.L. Cheney;G. Racagni;E. Costa

  • Peripheral markers in testing pathophysiological hypotheses and diagnosing Alzheimer's disease

    L. Gasparini;M. Racchi;G. Binetti;M. Trabucchi

  • Effect of transcutaneous electrotherapy on CSF β-endorphin content in patients without pain problems

    Guiseppe Salar;Ivo Job;Salvatore Mingrino;Angelo Bosio

  • Secretory processing of amyloid precursor protein is inhibited by increase in cellular cholesterol content

    Marco Racchi;Roberta Baetta;Nathalie Salvietti;Paola Ianna

  • Gene dose of the ε4 allele of apolipoprotein E and disease progression in sporadic late-onset alzheimer's disease

    Giovanni B. Frisoni;Stefano Govoni;Cristina Geroldi;Angelo Bianchetti

  • Effectiveness of procedural memory stimulation in mild Alzheimer's disease patients: A controlled study

    Orazio Zanetti;Gabriele Zanieri;Giuseppina Di Giovanni;Luc Pietre De Vreese

  • Depressive symptoms of Alzheimer caregivers are mainly due to personal rather than patient factors

    Orazio Zanetti;Giovanni Frisoni;Angelo Bianchetti;Giancarlo Tamanza

  • Differential Level of Platelet Amyloid β Precursor Protein Isoforms: An Early Marker for Alzheimer Disease

    M. Di Luca;L. Pastorino;A. Bianchetti;J. Perez

  • Apolipoprotein E ε4 Allele in Alzheimer's Disease and Vascular Dementia

    Giovanni B. Frisoni;Laura Calabresi;Cristina Geroldi;Angelo Bianchetti

Frequent Co-Authors

PierFranco Spano
PierFranco Spano University of Brescia
Stefano Govoni
Stefano Govoni University of Pavia
Giovanni B. Frisoni
Giovanni B. Frisoni University of Geneva
Marco Racchi
Marco Racchi University of Pavia
Giulio Maria Pasinetti
Giulio Maria Pasinetti Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Ildebrando Appollonio
Ildebrando Appollonio University of Milano-Bicocca
William C. Wetsel
William C. Wetsel Duke University
Orazio Zanetti
Orazio Zanetti Ordine Ospedaliero di San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli
Lalit Kalra
Lalit Kalra King's College London
Flaminio Cattabeni
Flaminio Cattabeni University of Milan

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a degree in neuroscience, there are several related fields and online programs that can broaden your career opportunities. Psychology and social work are two examples, offering pathways into research, counseling, and therapy. Many students interested in the brain and behavior pursue affordable psychology or social science degrees that overlap with neuroscience concepts.

For those seeking flexibility, some of the cheapest online psychology degree programs can be a smart and accessible starting point. If you’re interested in advanced clinical or counseling roles, it’s important to factor in how much does masters in psychology cost before applying to graduate programs.

Therapy-focused careers are also popular with neuroscience graduates. You might want to explore a masters in marriage and family therapy online for training in relationship-centered counseling. Social work tracks are another strong option; explore admission requirements for msw programs if you’re interested in community-based mental health or advocacy roles.

Best Scientists Citing Marco Trabucchi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles