World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
79
Citations
23180
World Ranking
17550
National Ranking
8779

George S. Roth publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George S. Roth sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 327 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

George S. Roth D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George S. Roth sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

George S. Roth is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their professional background centers on scientific research conducted within this prominent government agency, which plays a critical role in biomedical and public health advancements.

There are no specific records of recent papers authored by George S. Roth, nor are there details about frequent co-authors or publication venues associated with their work. Additionally, no book publications are listed under their name.

Information about their main fields or subfields of study is not available, and there are no recorded main topics of research or specialized work areas attributed to them from the provided data.

The profile also does not indicate any awards or recognitions granted to George S. Roth. The status of the scientist is current, and they are not deceased according to the information provided.

Best Publications

  • Impact of caloric restriction on health and survival in rhesus monkeys from the NIA study

    Julie A. Mattison;George S. Roth;T. Mark Beasley;Edward M. Tilmont

  • Caloric restriction improves health and survival of rhesus monkeys.

    Julie A. Mattison;Ricki J. Colman;T. Mark Beasley;T. Mark Beasley;David B. Allison

  • Biomarkers of Caloric Restriction May Predict Longevity in Humans

    George S. Roth;Mark A. Lane;Donald K. Ingram;Julie A. Mattison

  • Extending the lifespan of long-lived mice.

    Andrzej Bartke;J. Chris Wright;Julie A. Mattison;Donald K. Ingram

  • Calorie restriction mimetics: an emerging research field.

    Donald K Ingram;Min Zhu;Jacek Mamczarz;Sige Zou

  • Dopamine induces apoptosis through an oxidation-involved SAPK/JNK activation pathway.

    Yongquan Luo;Hiroyuki Umegaki;Xiantao Wang;Ryoichi Abe

  • Caloric restriction increases neurotrophic factor levels and attenuates neurochemical and behavioral deficits in a primate model of Parkinson's disease

    Navin Maswood;Jennifer Young;Edward Tilmont;Zhiming Zhang

  • Overexpression of dopamine D2 receptors reduces alcohol self-administration.

    Panayotis K. Thanos;Nora D. Volkow;Paul Freimuth;Hiroyuki Umegaki

  • Calorie restriction lowers body temperature in rhesus monkeys, consistent with a postulated anti-aging mechanism in rodents

    Mark A. Lane;David J. Baer;William V. Rumpler;Richard Weindruch

  • Aging in Rhesus Monkeys: Relevance to Human Health Interventions

    George S. Roth;Julie A. Mattison;Mary Ann Ottinger;Mark E. Chachich

  • Calorie restriction in rhesus monkeys

    Julie A Mattison;Mark A Lane;George S Roth;Donald K Ingram

  • Reduced beta-adrenergic receptor concentrations in ageing man.

    D D Schocken;G S Roth

  • Promotion of wound repair in old mice by local injection of macrophages

    David Danon;Mary Ann Kowatch;George S. Roth

  • Caloric restriction in primates and relevance to humans.

    George S. Roth;Donald K. Ingram;Mark A. Lane

  • Age-related Decline in Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Activity in Epidermal Growth Factor-stimulated Rat Hepatocytes

    Yusen Liu;Kathryn Z. Guyton;Myriam Gorospe;Qingbo Xu

  • A cross-link breaker has sustained effects on arterial and ventricular properties in older rhesus monkeys.

    Peter V. Vaitkevicius;Mark Lane;Harold Spurgeon;Donald K. Ingram

  • Longevity and the genetic determination of collagen glycoxidation kinetics in mammalian senescence.

    David R. Sell;Mark A. Lane;Wesley A. Johnson;Edward J. Masoro

  • Age-related Changes in the Nigrostriatum: A Behavioral and Biochemical Analysis

    James A. Joseph;Rick E. Berger;Bernard T. Engel;George S. Roth

  • Amyloid beta-peptide disrupts carbachol-induced muscarinic cholinergic signal transduction in cortical neurons

    Jeremiah F. Kelly;Katsutoshi Furukawa;Steven W. Barger;Mohan R. Rengen

  • Calorie restriction in primates: will it work and how will we know?

    George S. Roth;Donald K. Ingram;Mark A. Lane

Frequent Co-Authors

Donald K. Ingram
Donald K. Ingram Louisiana State University
Bruce J. Baum
Bruce J. Baum National Institutes of Health
Rafael de Cabo
Rafael de Cabo National Institutes of Health
James A. Joseph
James A. Joseph Tufts University
David B. Allison
David B. Allison Indiana University
Henryk F. Urbanski
Henryk F. Urbanski Oregon National Primate Research Center
Nikki J. Holbrook
Nikki J. Holbrook Yale University
Joseph M. Rifkind
Joseph M. Rifkind Johns Hopkins University
Mark P. Mattson
Mark P. Mattson Johns Hopkins University
John A. Matochik
John A. Matochik National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in medicine opens the door to many related online degrees and alternative career paths. For those interested in holistic health or dietetics, pursuing an online nutritionist degree combines flexible study with a strong foundation in nutritional science—an ideal option for students who wish to support healthcare through dietary guidance.

Management roles in healthcare are also accessible. Enrolling in cahme-accredited online programs ensures you receive a high-quality education in healthcare administration, which is vital for those pursuing leadership positions in hospitals or clinics.

For registered nurses aiming to advance their credentials without clinical requirements, the rn to bsn online no clinicals pathway offers a streamlined route to a bachelor’s degree, enhancing both career prospects and earning potential.

Finally, nurses wishing to reach the highest level of clinical practice can consider the shortest msn to dnp program, which allows experienced RNs to quickly earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice online. These flexible options make progressing in your healthcare career more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing George S. Roth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles