World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
44
Citations
12537
World Ranking
7050
National Ranking
3043

John A. Matochik publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John A. Matochik sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 78 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

John A. Matochik D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John A. Matochik sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

John A. Matochik is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their research contributions include work published in academic venues such as UNC Libraries.

One notable paper by Matochik is "Brain pathways to recovery from alcohol dependence," published in 2020 within UNC Libraries.

Throughout their scientific work, Matochik has collaborated with several coauthors, including:

  • Changhai Cui
  • Antonio Noronha
  • Kenneth R. Warren
  • George F. Koob
  • Rajita Sinha

The frequent publication venue for their work includes UNC Libraries.

Best Publications

  • Image processing and analysis methods for the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study.

    Donald J. Hagler;Sean N. Hatton;M. Daniela Cornejo;Carolina Makowski

  • The conception of the ABCD study: From substance use to a broad NIH collaboration

    Nora D. Volkow;George F. Koob;Robert T. Croyle;Diana W. Bianchi

  • Orbitofrontal cortex dysfunction in abstinent cocaine abusers performing a decision-making task

    Karen I. Bolla;Dana A. Eldreth;Edythe D. London;Kent A. Kiehl;Kent A. Kiehl

  • Decision-making in a Risk-taking Task: A PET Study

    Monique Ernst;Karen Bolla;Maria Mouratidis;Carlo Contoreggi

  • Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder in people with generalized resistance to thyroid hormone

    P Hauser;A J Zametkin;P Martinez;B Vitiello

  • DOPA Decarboxylase Activity in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Adults. A [Fluorine-18]Fluorodopa Positron Emission Tomographic Study

    Monique Ernst;Alan J. Zametkin;John A. Matochik;Peter H. Jons

  • Neural substrates of faulty decision-making in abstinent marijuana users.

    Karen I. Bolla;Dana A. Eldreth;Dana A. Eldreth;John A. Matochik;Jean-Lud Cadet

  • Mood disturbances and regional cerebral metabolic abnormalities in recently abstinent methamphetamine abusers.

    Edythe D. London;Sara L. Simon;Steven M. Berman;Mark A. Mandelkern

  • Sex-related Differences in a Gambling Task and Its Neurological Correlates

    Karen I. Bolla;D. A. Eldreth;J. A. Matochik;J. L. Cadet

  • Neural substrates of decision making in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

    Monique Ernst;Alane S. Kimes;Edythe D. London;John A. Matochik

  • High midbrain [18F]DOPA accumulation in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

    Monique Ernst;Alan J. Zametkin;John A. Matochik;Daisy Pascualvaca

  • Prefrontal cortical dysfunction in abstinent cocaine abusers

    Karen Bolla;Monique Ernst;Kent Kiehl;Maria Mouratidis

  • Frontal cortical tissue composition in abstinent cocaine abusers: a magnetic resonance imaging study

    John A. Matochik;Edythe D. London;Dana A. Eldreth;Jean Lud Cadet

  • Altered brain tissue composition in heavy marijuana users

    John A. Matochik;Dana A. Eldreth;Jean Lud Cadet;Karen I. Bolla

  • Abnormal brain activity in prefrontal brain regions in abstinent marijuana users.

    Dana A. Eldreth;John A. Matochik;Jean-Lud Cadet;Karen I. Bolla

  • Low medial prefrontal dopaminergic activity in autistic children.

    M Ernst;AJ Zametkin;JA Matochik;D Pascualvaca

  • A population-average MRI-based atlas collection of the rhesus macaque

    Donald G. McLaren;Kristopher J. Kosmatka;Terrance R. Oakes;Christopher D. Kroenke;Christopher D. Kroenke

  • Presynaptic dopaminergic deficits in Lesch-Nyhan disease

    Monique Ernst;Alan J. Zametkin;John A. Matochik;Daisy Pascualvaca

  • Smaller Volume of Prefrontal Lobe in Polysubstance Abusers: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

    M.D Xiang Liu;John A Matochik;M.D Jean-Lud Cadet;Edythe D London

  • Effect of nicotine on brain activation during performance of a working memory task

    Monique Ernst;John A. Matochik;Stephen J. Heishman;John D. Van Horn

Frequent Co-Authors

Edythe D. London
Edythe D. London University of California, Los Angeles
Monique Ernst
Monique Ernst National Institutes of Health
Robert M. Cohen
Robert M. Cohen University of Cincinnati Medical Center
Jean Lud Cadet
Jean Lud Cadet National Institute on Drug Abuse
Ronald J. Barfield
Ronald J. Barfield University of California, Los Angeles
Mark E. Schmidt
Mark E. Schmidt Janssen (Belgium)
William Z. Potter
William Z. Potter National Institutes of Health
Donald K. Ingram
Donald K. Ingram Louisiana State University
George S. Roth
George S. Roth National Institutes of Health
B. J. Casey
B. J. Casey Barnard College

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in neuroscience, various online degrees and career pathways can complement or extend your expertise. Many pursue advanced studies in counseling, therapy, or psychology to better understand brain function, behavior, and mental health support.

Those aiming to work directly within schools can consider programs like the university of the cumberlands school counseling degree, which offers specialized training for counseling roles within educational settings. If affordability is a concern, exploring the cheapest mental health counseling degree options can provide a path to meaningful work in clinical or community-based environments.

For those interested in supporting families and couples, accredited online mft programs accredited offer focused training in marriage and family therapy—an area related to human behavior and relationships. Finally, students seeking a broad yet versatile foundation on cognitive, behavioral, and emotional processes may opt for an online psychology masters, which can open doors to various roles in research, mental health, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing John A. Matochik

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles