World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 36 9520 8902 5044 4599 90 5497

Kristin Bernard publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kristin Bernard between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kristin Bernard published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 4.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2021. 11 of the 104 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2021. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 1 publication 2010: 3 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 4 publications
2004 2025

104 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kristin Bernard: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 0
2006 0
2007 0
2008 1
2009 1
2010 3
2011 3
2012 2
2013 4
2014 5
2015 6
2016 3
2017 5
2018 12
2019 11
2020 9
2021 15
2022 6
2023 6
2024 7
2025 4
Total 104
Download as CSV

Kristin Bernard publications per year - data summary

  • Kristin Bernard, a Psychology scholar from Stony Brook University, has 104 publications recorded across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2004 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2021, with 15 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 2004, 2008 and 2009, with 1 publication each.
  • 3 of the 22 years in the span carry no publications at all (2005, 2006 and 2007).
  • The rate of publication averages 4.7 papers per year over the whole span, or 5.5 per year counting only the 19 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 38 publications, 37% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2004-2011: 9 publications (1.1 per year); 2012-2019: 48 publications (6.0 per year); 2020-2025: 47 publications (7.8 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Kristin Bernard publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kristin Bernard sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 90 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 90
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Kristin Bernard publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Kristin Bernard, a Psychology scholar from Stony Brook University, records 90 publications - the 14th percentile of the discipline.
  • 14% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Kristin Bernard, and about 86% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Kristin Bernard ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Kristin Bernard D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kristin Bernard sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 36
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Kristin Bernard D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Kristin Bernard, a Psychology scholar from Stony Brook University, records 36 D-Index - the 19th percentile of the discipline.
  • 19% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Kristin Bernard, and about 81% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Kristin Bernard ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Kristin Bernard is affiliated with Stony Brook University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on psychology and social sciences, with significant contributions to clinical psychology and social psychology. Other areas of study include safety research, experimental and cognitive psychology, and public health, environmental and occupational health.

The main topics addressed in Bernard's work involve child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, child abuse and trauma, attachment and relationship dynamics, child welfare and adoption, maternal mental health during pregnancy and postpartum, early childhood education and development, and family dynamics and relationships.

Bernard has published numerous papers in various scholarly journals. Some recent notable works include:

  • Attachment goes to court: child protection and custody issues, 2021, Attachment & Human Development
  • Parental sensitivity mediates the sustained effect of Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-up on cortisol in middle childhood: A randomized clinical trial, 2020, Psychoneuroendocrinology
  • Preoccupied and Dismissing Attachment Representations Are Differentially Associated With Anxiety in Adolescence and Adulthood: A Meta-Analysis, 2020, Clinical Psychological Science
  • Epigenetic Age Acceleration and Chronological Age: Associations With Cognitive Performance in Daily Life, 2023, The Journals of Gerontology Series A
  • Changing parental depression and sensitivity: Randomized clinical trial of ABC's effectiveness in the community, 2020, Development and Psychopathology

Bernard frequently collaborates with several other researchers. Notable frequent co-authors include Mary Dozier, Sheri Madigan, Glenn I. Roisman, Or Dagan, and Laura Perrone.

The scientist's work has appeared repeatedly in key venues such as Development and Psychopathology, Developmental Psychobiology, Child Development, Developmental Psychology, and Attachment & Human Development.

Best Publications

  • Enhancing Attachment Organization Among Maltreated Children: Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial

    Kristin Bernard;Mary Dozier;Johanna Bick;Erin Lewis-Morrarty

  • Disorganized attachment in infancy : a review of the phenomenon and its implications for clinicians and policy-makers

    Pehr Granqvist;L. Alan Sroufe;Mary Dozier;Erik Hesse

  • Effects of a Foster Parent Training Program on Young Children's Attachment Behaviors: Preliminary Evidence from a Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Mary Dozier;Oliver Lindhiem;Erin Lewis;Johanna Bick

  • Association between maternal depression and maternal sensitivity from birth to 12 months: a meta-analysis

    Kristin Bernard;Galia Nissim;Suzanne Vaccaro;Jordan L Harris

  • Cognitive Flexibility and Theory of Mind Outcomes Among Foster Children: Preschool Follow-up Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial

    Erin Lewis-Morrarty;Mary Dozier;Kristin Bernard;Stephanie M. Terracciano

  • Intervening to enhance cortisol regulation among children at risk for neglect: Results of a randomized clinical trial.

    Kristin Bernard;Mary Dozier;Johanna Bick;M. Kathleen Gordon

  • Adult attachment representations and depressive symptoms: A meta-analysis

    Or Dagan;Christopher R. Facompré;Kristin Bernard

  • Examining Infants' Cortisol Responses to Laboratory Tasks among Children Varying in Attachment Disorganization: Stress Reactivity or Return to Baseline?.

    Kristin Bernard;Mary Dozier

  • Parental responsiveness moderates the association between early-life stress and reduced telomere length.

    A. Asok;K. Bernard;T. L. Roth;J. B. Rosen

  • Intervention effects on diurnal cortisol rhythms of Child Protective Services-referred infants in early childhood: preschool follow-up results of a randomized clinical trial.

    Kristin Bernard;Camelia E. Hostinar;Mary Dozier

  • Maltreatment and diurnal cortisol regulation: A meta-analysis

    Kristin Bernard;Allison Frost;Charles B. Bennett;Oliver Lindhiem

  • Cortisol Production Patterns in Young Children Living With Birth Parents vs Children Placed in Foster Care Following Involvement of Child Protective Services

    Kristin Bernard;Zachary Butzin-Dozier;Joseph Rittenhouse;Mary Dozier

  • Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-up: Addressing the Needs of Infants and Toddlers Exposed to Inadequate or Problematic Caregiving.

    Mary Dozier;Kristin Bernard

  • Intervention effects on negative affect of CPS-referred children: Results of a randomized clinical trial

    Teresa Lind;Kristin Bernard;Emily Ross;Mary Dozier

  • Effects of an Attachment‐Based Intervention on Child Protective Services–Referred Mothers' Event‐Related Potentials to Children's Emotions

    Kristin Bernard;Robert Simons;Mary Dozier

  • Parental synchrony and nurturance as targets in an attachment based intervention: building upon Mary Ainsworth's insights about mother-infant interaction.

    Kristin Bernard;EB Meade;Mary Dozier

  • Foster Mother–Infant Bonding: Associations Between Foster Mothers' Oxytocin Production, Electrophysiological Brain Activity, Feelings of Commitment, and Caregiving Quality

    Johanna Bick;Mary Dozier;Kristin Bernard;Damion Grasso

  • Attachment goes to court: child protection and custody issues

    Tommie Forslund;Pehr Granqvist;Marinus H van IJzendoorn;Avi Sagi-Schwartz

  • In Vivo Feedback Predicts Parent Behavior Change in the Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-up Intervention

    EB Caron;Kristin Bernard;Mary Dozier

  • Effectiveness of interventions in preventing disorganized attachment: A meta-analysis.

    Christopher R Facompré;Kristin Bernard;Theodore E A Waters

  • Infants and Toddlers in Foster Care

    Mary Dozier;Charles H. Zeanah;Kristin Bernard

Frequent Co-Authors

Mary Dozier
Mary Dozier University of Delaware
Carlo Schuengel
Carlo Schuengel Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Sheri Madigan
Sheri Madigan University of Calgary
Marian J. Bakermans-Kranenburg
Marian J. Bakermans-Kranenburg ISPA - University Institute of Psychological, Social and Life Sciences
Robert F. Simons
Robert F. Simons University of Delaware
Pasco Fearon
Pasco Fearon University College London
Miriam Steele
Miriam Steele New School
Camelia E. Hostinar
Camelia E. Hostinar University of California, Davis
Glenn I. Roisman
Glenn I. Roisman University of Minnesota
Howard Steele
Howard Steele New School

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA offers diverse online degrees and career options, especially in mental health services. Many students pursue online bachelor’s and master’s programs, building strong foundations in counseling, clinical practice, or specialized fields like child and adolescent psychology.

To advance professionally, aspiring therapists must meet state-specific requirements. For example, Arlington licensed therapist requirements highlight key steps such as obtaining a graduate degree, gaining supervised experience, and passing national exams. City and state licensing criteria share similarities, but each location has unique regulations. Understanding what’s needed for becoming a licensed therapist in Atlanta or meeting licensed therapist requirements in Aurora can help students plan their academic pathways and certification goals effectively.

Graduates also target thriving job markets, including those requiring licensed therapist requirements in Austin. With growing demand for mental health professionals, online degrees make this rewarding field more accessible than ever before. Research requirements in your area to ensure you choose the right program and career direction.

Best Scientists Citing Kristin Bernard

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles