World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 68 2517 2304 1456 1303 212 14331

Philip A. Fisher publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Philip A. Fisher between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Philip A. Fisher published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 6.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2012. 16 of the 236 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2012. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 4 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 12 publications
1992 2025

236 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Philip A. Fisher: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 2
1994 0
1995 0
1996 2
1997 2
1998 2
1999 3
2000 2
2001 0
2002 5
2003 5
2004 1
2005 4
2006 7
2007 5
2008 6
2009 5
2010 7
2011 10
2012 20
2013 13
2014 11
2015 13
2016 14
2017 14
2018 12
2019 17
2020 15
2021 9
2022 10
2023 3
2024 4
2025 12
Total 236
Download as CSV

Philip A. Fisher publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip A. Fisher sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 211–220 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 212 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313 212
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Philip A. Fisher D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip A. Fisher sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 68–69 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219 68
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Philip A. Fisher is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their primary fields of study include Psychology and Social Sciences, with a particular focus on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Education, Social Psychology, and General Health Professions.

Their research extensively covers topics such as Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, Early Childhood Education and Development, COVID-19 and Mental Health, Family and Disability Support Research, Family Support in Illness, Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum, and Infant Development and Preterm Care.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Philip A. Fisher include:

  • Gut Feelings Begin in Childhood: the Gut Metagenome Correlates with Early Environment, Caregiving, and Behavior (2020, mBio)
  • The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on child and adolescent development around the world (2021, Child Development)
  • Characterizing the impact of adversity, abuse, and neglect on adolescent amygdala resting-state functional connectivity (2020, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience)
  • Material hardship level and unpredictability in relation to U.S. households' family interactions and emotional well-being: Insights from the COVID-19 pandemic (2022, Social Science & Medicine)
  • Early experience unpredictability in child development as a model for understanding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic: A translational neuroscience perspective (2022, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience)

Philip A. Fisher has frequently published in venues such as Development and Psychopathology, Prevention Science, Early Childhood Research Quarterly, UNC Libraries, and Children and Youth Services Review.

The scientist collaborates regularly with several co-authors, including:

  • Sihong Liu
  • Leslie E. Roos
  • Jacqueline Sims
  • Jessica Flannery
  • Ryan J. Giuliano

Best Publications

  • Effects of a therapeutic intervention for foster preschoolers on diurnal cortisol activity

    Philip A. Fisher;Mike Stoolmiller;Megan R. Gunnar;Bert O. Burraston

  • Psychosocial and cognitive functioning of children with specific profiles of maltreatment

    Katherine C. Pears;Hyoun K. Kim;Philip A. Fisher

  • Preventive intervention for maltreated preschool children: impact on children's behavior, neuroendocrine activity, and foster parent functioning.

    Philip A. Fisher;Megan R. Gunnar;Patricia Chamberlain;John B. Reid

  • Morning cortisol Levels in preschool‐aged foster children: Differential effects of maltreatment type

    Jacqueline Bruce;Philip A. Fisher;Katherine C. Pears;Seymour Levine

  • Rethinking evidence-based practice and two-generation programs to create the future of early childhood policy.

    Jack P. Shonkoff;Philip A. Fisher

  • Developmental, cognitive, and neuropsychological functioning in preschool-aged foster children: associations with prior maltreatment and placement history.

    Katherine Pears;Philip A Fisher

  • Bringing basic research on early experience and stress neurobiology to bear on preventive interventions for neglected and maltreated children

    Megan R. Gunnar;Philip A. Fisher

  • Practitioner Review: Children in foster care – vulnerabilities and evidence-based interventions that promote resilience processes

    Leslie D. Leve;Gordon T. Harold;Patricia Chamberlain;John A. Landsverk

  • Emotion understanding and theory of mind among maltreated children in foster care: evidence of deficits.

    Katherine C. Pears;Philip A. Fisher

  • Tribal participatory research: mechanisms of a collaborative model

    Philip A. Fisher;Thomas J. Ball

  • The Early Intervention Foster Care Program: Permanent Placement Outcomes From a Randomized Trial:

    Philip A. Fisher;Bert Burraston;Katherine Pears

  • Effects of therapeutic interventions for foster children on behavioral problems, caregiver attachment, and stress regulatory neural systems.

    Philip A. Fisher;Megan R. Gunnar;Mary Dozier;Jacqueline Bruce

  • Training the brain: practical applications of neural plasticity from the intersection of cognitive neuroscience, developmental psychology, and prevention science.

    Richard L. Bryck;Philip A. Fisher

  • Multidimensional Treatment Foster Care: A Program for Intensive Parenting, Family Support, and Skill Building

    Philip A. Fisher;Patricia Chamberlain

  • Neuropsychological characteristics and test behaviors of boys with early onset conduct problems.

    Matthew L. Speltz;Michelle DeKlyen;Rose Calderon;Mark T. Greenberg

  • Intervention effects on foster parent stress: associations with child cortisol levels.

    Philip A. Fisher;Mike Stoolmiller

  • Intervention Effects on Foster Preschoolers’ Attachment-Related Behaviors From a Randomized Trial

    Philip A. Fisher;Hyoun K. Kim

  • Early elementary school adjustment of maltreated children in foster care: the roles of inhibitory control and caregiver involvement.

    Katherine C. Pears;Philip A. Fisher;Jacqueline Bruce;Hyoun K. Kim

  • Child Maltreatment and Foster Care: Unpacking the Effects of Prenatal and Postnatal Parental Substance Use

    Dana K. Smith;Amber B. Johnson;Katherine C. Pears;Philip A. Fisher

  • Interventions for foster parents: implications for developmental theory.

    Mary Dozier;Kathleen Albus;Philip A. Fisher;Sandra Sepulveda

Frequent Co-Authors

Katherine C. Pears
Katherine C. Pears Oregon Social Learning Center
Hyoun K. Kim
Hyoun K. Kim Yonsei University
Leslie D. Leve
Leslie D. Leve University of Oregon
Jennifer H. Pfeifer
Jennifer H. Pfeifer University of Oregon
Megan R. Gunnar
Megan R. Gunnar University of Minnesota
Patricia Chamberlain
Patricia Chamberlain University of Oregon
Elliot T. Berkman
Elliot T. Berkman University of Oregon
Heidemarie K. Laurent
Heidemarie K. Laurent University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Jenae M. Neiderhiser
Jenae M. Neiderhiser Pennsylvania State University
David Reiss
David Reiss Yale University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens the door to a wide range of online degrees and diverse career pathways. Whether you’re seeking flexibility through online study or looking for programs that provide specialized training, there are many options to fit your personal and professional goals.

Prospective students can compare programs by location and reputation. For example, those interested in urban environments may want to review the top psychology programs in Raleigh, known for innovation and research opportunities. In the western region, students may consider the top psychology degrees in Reno for their strong community partnerships and applied experience.

Students looking towards different geographic areas can check the best psychology program rankings in South Dakota to find affordable programs with a focus on foundational skills. The best psychology degree programs ranking in Shreveport also highlights specialized offerings in clinical, counseling, and school psychology.

Completing an online psychology degree can lead to careers in mental health, education, business, and social services. Many graduates go on to advanced graduate training, research, or licensure in fields such as clinical psychology and counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Philip A. Fisher

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles