World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 68 2456 2245 1424 1273 200 19818

Mary Dozier publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mary Dozier between 1986 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mary Dozier published across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025, averaging 5.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2021. 17 of the 230 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2021. 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 5 publications
1986 2025

230 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mary Dozier: publications per year, 1986 to 2025
Year Publications
1986 1
1987 0
1988 3
1989 0
1990 1
1991 2
1992 2
1993 1
1994 1
1995 1
1996 1
1997 0
1998 3
1999 3
2000 1
2001 3
2002 6
2003 3
2004 3
2005 5
2006 7
2007 4
2008 4
2009 4
2010 7
2011 4
2012 11
2013 7
2014 9
2015 8
2016 4
2017 7
2018 10
2019 18
2020 17
2021 22
2022 15
2023 15
2024 12
2025 5
Total 230
Download as CSV

Mary Dozier publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary Dozier sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 200 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343 200
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Mary Dozier D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary Dozier sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 68–69 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219 68
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Mary Dozier is affiliated with the University of Delaware in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology, medicine, and social sciences, with notable specialization in clinical psychology, social psychology, public health, environmental and occupational health, safety research, and pediatrics, perinatology, and child health.

The focus of their work centers on several key topics, including:

  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Family and Disability Support Research
  • Early Childhood Education and Development

They have contributed extensively to various publication venues, frequently publishing in:

  • Development and Psychopathology
  • American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
  • Attachment & Human Development
  • Developmental Psychobiology
  • Infant Mental Health Journal

Recent publications by Mary Dozier include:

  • Attachment goes to court: child protection and custody issues (2021, Attachment & Human Development)
  • Early Parenting Intervention Effects on Brain Responses to Maternal Cues Among High-Risk Children (2020, American Journal of Psychiatry)
  • Transitioning to telehealth due to COVID-19: Maintaining model fidelity in a home visiting program for parents of vulnerable infants (2021, Infant Mental Health Journal)
  • Parental sensitivity mediates the sustained effect of Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-up on cortisol in middle childhood: A randomized clinical trial (2020, Psychoneuroendocrinology)
  • Adverse caregiving in infancy blunts neural processing of the mother (2020, Nature Communications)

Mary Dozier has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Alexandra R. Tabachnick
  • Kristin Bernard
  • Lindsay Zajac
  • K. Lee Raby
  • Madelyn H. Labella

Best Publications

  • Attachment and psychopathology in adulthood.

    Mary Dozier;K. Chase Stovall-McClough;Kathleen E. Albus

  • Attachment for Infants in Foster Care: The Role of Caregiver State of Mind

    Mary Dozier;K. Chase Stovall;Kathleen E. Albus;Brady Bates

  • Psychophysiology in Attachment Interviews: Converging Evidence for Deactivating Strategies

    Mary Dozier;R. Rogers Kobak

  • Clinicians as Caregivers: Role of Attachment Organization in Treatment

    Mary Dozier;Kelly L. Cue;Lara Barnett

  • Attachment organization and treatment use for adults with serious psychopathological disorders

    Mary Dozier

  • Enhancing Attachment Organization Among Maltreated Children: Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial

    Kristin Bernard;Mary Dozier;Johanna Bick;Erin Lewis-Morrarty

  • Developing Evidence‐Based Interventions for Foster Children: An Example of a Randomized Clinical Trial with Infants and Toddlers

    Mary Dozier;Elizabeth Peloso;Oliver Lindhiem;M. Kathleen Gordon

  • Effects of an attachment-based intervention on the cortisol production of infants and toddlers in foster care.

    Mary Dozier;Elizabeth Peloso;Erin Lewis;Jean-Philippe Laurenceau

  • Effective treatment relationships for persons with serious psychiatric disorders: the importance of attachment states of mind.

    Christine L. Tyrrell;Mary Dozier;Gregory B. Teague;Roger D. Fallot

  • The development of attachment in new relationships: single subject analyses for 10 foster infants.

    K. Chase Stovall;Mary Dozier

  • Foster children's diurnal production of cortisol: an exploratory study

    Mary Dozier;Melissa Manni;M. Kathleen Gordon;Elizabeth Peloso

  • Forming attachments in foster care: infant attachment behaviors during the first 2 months of placement.

    K. Chase Stovall-McClough;Mary Dozier

  • Disorganized attachment in infancy : a review of the phenomenon and its implications for clinicians and policy-makers

    Pehr Granqvist;L. Alan Sroufe;Mary Dozier;Erik Hesse

  • Early-life stress is associated with impairment in cognitive control in adolescence: An fMRI study

    Sven C. Mueller;Francoise S. Maheu;Francoise S. Maheu;Mary Dozier;Elizabeth Peloso

  • Effects of therapeutic interventions for foster children on behavioral problems, caregiver attachment, and stress regulatory neural systems.

    Philip A. Fisher;Megan R. Gunnar;Mary Dozier;Jacqueline Bruce

  • Effects of a Foster Parent Training Program on Young Children's Attachment Behaviors: Preliminary Evidence from a Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Mary Dozier;Oliver Lindhiem;Erin Lewis;Johanna Bick

  • The effect of placement instability on adopted children's inhibitory control abilities and oppositional behavior.

    Erin E. Lewis;Mary Dozier;John Ackerman;Sandra Sepulveda-Kozakowski

  • Differential patterns of whole-genome DNA methylation in institutionalized children and children raised by their biological parents

    Oksana Yu. Naumova;Maria Lee;Roman Koposov;Moshe Szyf

  • The role of attachment in therapeutic relationships.

    Mary Dozier;Christine Tyrrell

  • Discrepancies between self- and other-report of psychiatric symptomatology: Effects of dismissing attachment strategies

    Mary Dozier;Spring W. Lee

Frequent Co-Authors

Kristin Bernard
Kristin Bernard Stony Brook University
Robert F. Simons
Robert F. Simons University of Delaware
Charles H. Zeanah
Charles H. Zeanah Tulane University
Donald A. Wilson
Donald A. Wilson Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research
Regina M. Sullivan
Regina M. Sullivan New York University
Elizabeth A. Carlson
Elizabeth A. Carlson University of Minnesota
Annie Bernier
Annie Bernier University of Montreal
Nim Tottenham
Nim Tottenham Columbia University
Carlo Schuengel
Carlo Schuengel Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Philip A. Fisher
Philip A. Fisher Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens diverse opportunities across clinical practice, counseling, research, and academia. Many students today choose to earn online degrees, allowing flexibility while meeting the rigorous educational standards required for licensure. Online psychology programs often cover essential topics such as human behavior, counseling techniques, and ethical practice.

It’s important to note that licensure requirements vary by location. For example, becoming a licensed therapist in Minneapolis requires specific coursework and supervised practice hours. Similarly, for those interested in working in Tennessee, the process for Nashville licensed therapist education requirements highlights particular state standards.

For prospective therapists in Louisiana, New Orleans licensed therapist requirements emphasize regionally accredited degrees and examination success. Meanwhile, in the Northeast, becoming a licensed therapist in New York City involves meeting comprehensive training and experience thresholds.

No matter your location, pursuing online psychology degrees can help you meet the foundational requirements for these rewarding career paths. Always check state-specific guidelines to ensure your program aligns with your licensure goals.

Best Scientists Citing Mary Dozier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles