World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
58
Citations
12054
World Ranking
2506
National Ranking
768

H. Scott Matthews publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where H. Scott Matthews sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 166 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

H. Scott Matthews D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where H. Scott Matthews sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

H. Scott Matthews is affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University in the United States. Their research spans the fields of Engineering and Environmental Science, with notable subfields including Automotive Engineering, Water Science and Technology, Aerospace Engineering, Transportation, and Electrical and Electronic Engineering.

The primary topics of their work encompass Transportation and Mobility Innovations, UAV Applications and Optimization, Urban Transport and Accessibility, Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies, Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure, Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies, and Environmental Impact and Sustainability.

Matthews has published multiple scientific papers across various journals and venues. Some recent notable publications include:

  • "Uncertainty caused by life cycle impact assessment methods: Case studies in process-based LCI databases" (2021) published in Resources Conservation and Recycling
  • "Drone flight data reveal energy and greenhouse gas emissions savings for very small package delivery" (2022) published in Patterns
  • "Are travelers substituting between transportation network companies (TNC) and public buses? A case study in Pittsburgh" (2020) published in Transportation
  • "In-flight positional and energy use data set of a DJI Matrice 100 quadcopter for small package delivery" (2021) published in Scientific Data
  • "Hydropower under climate uncertainty: Characterizing the usable capacity of Brazilian, Colombian and Peruvian power plants under climate scenarios" (2021) published in Energy Sustainable Development/Energy for sustainable development

Frequent co-authors in Matthews' research include Constantine Samaras, Ana Lucía Cáceres, Paulina Jaramillo, Bart Nijssen, and Sebastian Scherer.

The scientist's publications are often featured in venues such as Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), arXiv (Cornell University), Journal of Transportation Engineering Part A Systems, Resources Conservation and Recycling, and Patterns.

Best Publications

  • Food-Miles and the Relative Climate Impacts of Food Choices in the United States

    Christopher L. Weber;H. Scott Matthews

  • The Importance of Carbon Footprint Estimation Boundaries

    H. Scott Matthews;Chris T. Hendrickson;Christopher L. Weber

  • Comparative life-cycle air emissions of coal, domestic natural gas, LNG, and SNG for electricity generation.

    Paulina Jaramillo;W. Michael Griffin;H. Scott Matthews

  • Categorization of Scope 3 emissions for streamlined enterprise carbon footprinting.

    Y Anny Huang;Christopher L Weber;H Scott Matthews

  • Example of a Hybrid Life-Cycle Assessment of Construction Processes

    Melissa Bilec;Robert Ries;H. Scott Matthews;Aurora L. Sharrard

  • Intelligent light control using sensor networks

    Vipul Singhvi;Andreas Krause;Carlos Guestrin;James H. Garrett

  • Enhancing Electricity Audits in Residential Buildings with Nonintrusive Load Monitoring

    Mario E. Berges;Ethan Goldman;H. Scott Matthews;Lucio Soibelman

  • THE ROLE OF INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSIS FOR THE SCREENING OF CORPORATE CARBON FOOTPRINTS

    Y. Anny Huang;Manfred Lenzen;Christopher L. Weber;Joy Murray

  • A mixed-unit input-output model for environmental life-cycle assessment and material flow analysis.

    Troy R Hawkins;Chris Hendrickson;Cortney Higgins;H Scott Matthews

  • Estimating Construction Project Environmental Effects Using an Input-Output-Based Hybrid Life-Cycle Assessment Model

    Aurora L. Sharrard;H. Scott Matthews;Robert J. Ries

  • Life-Cycle Assessment Modeling of Construction Processes for Buildings

    Melissa M. Bilec;Melissa M. Bilec;Melissa M. Bilec;Robert J. Ries;Robert J. Ries;Robert J. Ries;H. Scott Matthews;H. Scott Matthews;H. Scott Matthews

  • The Energy and Climate Change Implications of Different Music Delivery Methods

    Christopher L. Weber;Jonathan G. Koomey;H. Scott Matthews

  • Scoping the potential of monitoring and control technologies to reduce energy use in homes

    Robert J. Meyers;Eric D. Williams;H. Scott Matthews

  • Uncertainty in life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from United States natural gas end-uses and its effects on policy.

    Aranya Venkatesh;Paulina Jaramillo;W. Michael Griffin;H. Scott Matthews

  • Life cycle assessment of emerging technologies: Evaluation techniques at different stages of market and technical maturity

    Joule A. Bergerson;Adam Brandt;Joe Cresko;Michael Carbajales-Dale

  • User-Centered Nonintrusive Electricity Load Monitoring for Residential Buildings

    Mario Berges;Ethan Goldman;H. Scott Matthews;Lucio Soibelman

  • Learning Systems for Electric Consumption of Buildings

    Mario Berges;Ethan Goldman;H. Scott Matthews;Lucio Soibelman

  • Policy implications of uncertainty in modeled life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of biofuels

    Kimberley A. Mullins;W. Michael Griffin;H. Scott Matthews

  • Methods and Apparatuses for Monitoring Energy Consumption and Related Operations

    Mario E. Berges Gonzalez;Ethan J. Goldman;Luciio Soibelman;Burton W. Andrews

  • Landfill-gas-to-energy projects: analysis of net private and social benefits.

    Paulina Jaramillo;H. Scott Matthews

  • Cost-Effectiveness of Green Roofs

    Michael F Blackhurst;Chris Hendrickson;H. Scott Matthews

  • Economic Input-output Life-cycle Assessment of U.S. Residential Buildings

    Luis Ochoa;Chris Hendrickson;H. Scott Matthews

Frequent Co-Authors

Chris Hendrickson
Chris Hendrickson Carnegie Mellon University
W. Michael Griffin
W. Michael Griffin Carnegie Mellon University
Paulina Jaramillo
Paulina Jaramillo Carnegie Mellon University
Lester B. Lave
Lester B. Lave Carnegie Mellon University
Eric Williams
Eric Williams Rochester Institute of Technology
James H. Garrett
James H. Garrett Carnegie Mellon University
Lucio Soibelman
Lucio Soibelman University of Southern California
Cliff I. Davidson
Cliff I. Davidson Syracuse University
Arpad Horvath
Arpad Horvath University of California, Berkeley
Inês L. Azevedo
Inês L. Azevedo Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing H. Scott Matthews

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles