D-Index & Metrics Best Publications
Social Sciences and Humanities
Belgium
2022

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-index D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines. Citations Publications World Ranking National Ranking
Social Sciences and Humanities D-index 51 Citations 15,013 118 World Ranking 1199 National Ranking 7

Research.com Recognitions

Awards & Achievements

2022 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in Belgium Leader Award

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Social science
  • Educational technology
  • Pedagogy

His primary scientific interests are in Mathematics education, Technology integration, Educational technology, Pedagogy and Primary education. His is involved in several facets of Mathematics education study, as is seen by his studies on Teaching method and Computer literacy. Jo Tondeur combines topics linked to Information and Communications Technology with his work on Technology integration.

His Information and Communications Technology research incorporates themes from Pre service and Medical education. As part of one scientific family, Jo Tondeur deals mainly with the area of Pedagogy, narrowing it down to issues related to the Qualitative research, and often Faculty development, Association and Professional development. In his research, Cognitively Guided Instruction and Computers in the classroom is intimately related to School teachers, which falls under the overarching field of Primary education.

His most cited work include:

  • Student teachers' thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology (480 citations)
  • The impact of primary school teachers' educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers (446 citations)
  • Technological pedagogical content knowledge – a review of the literature (407 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Jo Tondeur mainly focuses on Mathematics education, Pedagogy, Information and Communications Technology, Educational technology and Technology integration. The concepts of his Mathematics education study are interwoven with issues in Qualitative research and Knowledge base. His research on Pedagogy frequently connects to adjacent areas such as Association.

His Information and Communications Technology research focuses on Primary education and how it relates to Perception. His Educational technology study incorporates themes from Technology education, Computer literacy and Professional development. When carried out as part of a general Professional development research project, his work on Faculty development is frequently linked to work in Qualitative property, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of study.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Mathematics education (46.86%)
  • Pedagogy (38.29%)
  • Information and Communications Technology (33.14%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?

  • Mathematics education (46.86%)
  • Blended learning (17.14%)
  • Technology integration (28.57%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Jo Tondeur spends much of his time researching Mathematics education, Blended learning, Technology integration, Information and Communications Technology and Educational technology. His Mathematics education research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Qualitative research and Role model. His Blended learning research integrates issues from Adult education and Professional development, Medical education.

His Faculty development study, which is part of a larger body of work in Professional development, is frequently linked to Institutional support, bridging the gap between disciplines. His studies deal with areas such as Self-efficacy, Teacher education and Public relations as well as Information and Communications Technology. In his study, which falls under the umbrella issue of Educational technology, Peer relationships and Digital competence is strongly linked to Training.

Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education (194 citations)
  • The importance of attitudes toward technology for pre-service teachers' technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge: Comparing structural equation modeling approaches (48 citations)
  • Students' motivation and subjective task value of participating in online and blended learning environments (40 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Social science
  • Educational technology
  • Pedagogy

Mathematics education, Educational technology, Teacher education, Information and Communications Technology and Blended learning are his primary areas of study. His work on Need for achievement as part of general Mathematics education study is frequently connected to Continuous feedback and Multivariate analysis of variance, therefore bridging the gap between diverse disciplines of science and establishing a new relationship between them. In the field of Educational technology, his study on Technology integration overlaps with subjects such as Qualitative property.

His Technology integration study combines topics in areas such as Self-efficacy and Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Pedagogy covers he research in Teacher education. His Pedagogy research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Flexibility and Value.

This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.

Best Publications

Student teachers' thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology

Guoyuan Sang;Martin Valcke;Johan van Braak;Jo Tondeur.
Computer Education (2010)

1060 Citations

The impact of primary school teachers' educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers

R. Hermans;J. Tondeur;J. van Braak;M. Valcke.
Computer Education (2008)

944 Citations

Technological pedagogical content knowledge – a review of the literature

Joke Voogt;Petra Fisser;N.N. Pareja Roblin;J. Tondeur.
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning (2013)

866 Citations

Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence

Jo Tondeur;Johan van Braak;Guoyuan Sang;Joke Voogt.
Computer Education (2012)

821 Citations

ICT integration in the classroom: Challenging the potential of a school policy

Jo Tondeur;Hilde van Keer;Johan van Braak;Martin Valcke.
Computer Education (2008)

596 Citations

Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: a systematic review of qualitative evidence

Jo Tondeur;Jo Tondeur;Jo Tondeur;Johan van Braak;Peggy A. Ertmer;Peggy A. Ertmer;Anne Ottenbreit-Leftwich.
Educational Technology Research and Development (2017)

543 Citations

Explaining different types of computer use among primary school teachers

Johan van Braak;Jo Tondeur;Martin Valcke.
European Journal of Psychology of Education (2004)

460 Citations

Curricula and the use of ICT in education: Two worlds apart?

Jo Tondeur;Johan van Braak;Martin Valcke.
British Journal of Educational Technology (2007)

442 Citations

A Multidimensional Approach to Determinants of Computer Use in Primary Education: Teacher and School Characteristics.

J. Tondeur;M. Valcke;J. Van Braak.
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning (2008)

411 Citations

The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education

Ronny Scherer;Fazilat Siddiq;Jo Tondeur.
Computers in Education (2019)

378 Citations

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Contact us

Best Scientists Citing Jo Tondeur

Joke Voogt

Joke Voogt

University of Amsterdam

Publications: 40

Ching Sing Chai

Ching Sing Chai

Chinese University of Hong Kong

Publications: 30

Johan van Braak

Johan van Braak

Ghent University

Publications: 28

Timothy Teo

Timothy Teo

Chinese University of Hong Kong

Publications: 25

Susan McKenney

Susan McKenney

University of Twente

Publications: 22

Chin Chung Tsai

Chin Chung Tsai

National Taiwan Normal University

Publications: 20

Martin Valcke

Martin Valcke

Ghent University

Publications: 15

Demetrios G. Sampson

Demetrios G. Sampson

University of Piraeus

Publications: 12

Joyce Hwee Ling Koh

Joyce Hwee Ling Koh

University of Otago

Publications: 12

Peggy A. Ertmer

Peggy A. Ertmer

Purdue University West Lafayette

Publications: 9

Matthew J. Koehler

Matthew J. Koehler

Michigan State University

Publications: 9

Francisco José García-Peñalvo

Francisco José García-Peñalvo

University of Salamanca

Publications: 8

Peter Van Petegem

Peter Van Petegem

University of Antwerp

Publications: 7

Yogesh K. Dwivedi

Yogesh K. Dwivedi

Swansea University

Publications: 7

Christine Michel

Christine Michel

Fisheries and Oceans Canada

Publications: 7

Jan Elen

Jan Elen

KU Leuven

Publications: 6

Trending Scientists

ronald brown

ronald brown

Bangor University

David M.J. Lilley

David M.J. Lilley

University of Dundee

Yong Wang

Yong Wang

Nanjing Tech University

Vincenzo Fiorentini

Vincenzo Fiorentini

University of Cagliari

Daniel Hering

Daniel Hering

University of Duisburg-Essen

André Schneider

André Schneider

University of Bern

Judith P. Johnson

Judith P. Johnson

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

Stephen J. Kennel

Stephen J. Kennel

University of Tennessee Medical Center

Arnfinn Sundsfjord

Arnfinn Sundsfjord

University of Tromsø - The Arctic University of Norway

Louise A. Rollins-Smith

Louise A. Rollins-Smith

Vanderbilt University

Terry Engelder

Terry Engelder

Pennsylvania State University

Julien Cohen-Adad

Julien Cohen-Adad

Polytechnique Montréal

Adam Strzelczyk

Adam Strzelczyk

Goethe University Frankfurt

John A. Parkinson

John A. Parkinson

Bangor University

Michael Bosnjak

Michael Bosnjak

Leibniz Association

Yaron Silberberg

Yaron Silberberg

Weizmann Institute of Science

Something went wrong. Please try again later.