World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 35 9858 9227 678 637 134 5204

Sven Joubert publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sven Joubert between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sven Joubert published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 6.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2009. 7 of the 164 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2009. 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 4 publications
2000 2025

164 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sven Joubert: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 2
2001 2
2002 1
2003 2
2004 10
2005 3
2006 2
2007 0
2008 3
2009 15
2010 9
2011 5
2012 12
2013 5
2014 7
2015 8
2016 9
2017 13
2018 15
2019 9
2020 8
2021 9
2022 3
2023 5
2024 3
2025 4
Total 164
Download as CSV

Sven Joubert publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sven Joubert sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 134 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 134
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Sven Joubert D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sven Joubert sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 35
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Sven Joubert is affiliated with the University of Montreal in Canada and has contributed extensively to research in Medicine and Neuroscience, with particular focus on Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research. Their work also spans Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, reflecting a broad engagement with brain function and behavior.

The scientist's research topics include:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies

Joubert has published in a range of scientific venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • Neuropsychology
  • Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
  • Gériatrie et Psychologie Neuropsychiatrie du Vieillissement
  • HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

Among the recent papers authored or co-authored by Joubert are:

  • A Meta-Analysis of Semantic Memory in Mild Cognitive Impairment, 2020, Neuropsychology Review

Other recent related works listed include, although they are by different lead authors, publications in Brain Sciences, Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, and Frontiers in Psychology focusing on neural activation, arterial stiffness effects on white matter, prospective memory training, and visual and cognitive functioning in older adults.

Frequent collaborators of Joubert include:

  • Isabelle Rouleau
  • Marie-Joëlle Chasles
  • Emilie Delage
  • Jessica Cole
  • Marc-Antoine Akzam-Ouellette

The thematic concentration in Joubert's work highlights interdisciplinary connections among neuropsychology, brain imaging, and cognitive rehabilitation approaches. Their contributions advance understanding in both clinical populations and healthy aging cohorts, particularly in areas involving memory, risk assessment in decision-making, and neural structural correlates associated with cognitive decline.

Best Publications

  • Areas of brain activation in males and females during viewing of erotic film excerpts

    Sherif Karama;André Roch Lecours;André Roch Lecours;Jean-Maxime Leroux;Pierre Bourgouin;Pierre Bourgouin

  • Evaluation of visual recognition memory in MCI patients.

    E. Barbeau;M. Didic;E. Tramoni;O. Felician

  • The cognitive and neural expression of semantic memory impairment in mild cognitive impairment and early Alzheimer's disease.

    Sven Joubert;Simona M Brambati;Jennyfer Ansado;Emmanuel J Barbeau

  • The effect of Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease on olfaction: a meta-analysis.

    Shady Rahayel;Johannes Frasnelli;Sven Joubert

  • Neural correlates of lexical and sublexical processes in reading

    Sven Joubert;Mario Beauregard;Nathalie Walter;Pierre Bourgouin

  • Holistic perception of the individual face is specific and necessary: Evidence from an extensive case study of acquired prosopagnosia

    Thomas Busigny;Sven Joubert;Olivier Felician;Mathieu Ceccaldi

  • The impact of aging on gray matter structural covariance networks.

    Maxime Montembeault;Sven Joubert;Sven Joubert;Julien Doyon;Julien Doyon;Julie Carrier;Julie Carrier

  • Impaired configurational processing in a case of progressive prosopagnosia associated with predominant right temporal lobe atrophy

    Sven Joubert;Olivier Felician;Emmanuel Barbeau;Anna Sontheimer

  • Patterns of semantic memory impairment in Mild Cognitive Impairment

    Sven Joubert;Olivier Felician;Emmanuel J Barbeau;Mira Didic

  • Early-onset and late-onset Alzheimer's disease are associated with distinct patterns of memory impairment.

    Sven Joubert;Natalina Gour;Eric Guedj;Mira Didic

  • Extent and Neural Basis of Semantic Memory Impairment in Mild Cognitive Impairment

    Emmanuel J Barbeau;Mira Didic;Sven Joubert;Eric Guedj

  • Cortical and subcortical gray matter bases of cognitive deficits in REM sleep behavior disorder.

    Shady Rahayel;Ronald B. Postuma;Jacques Montplaisir;Daphné Génier Marchand

  • The right temporal lobe variant of frontotemporal dementia: cognitive and neuroanatomical profile of three patients.

    Sven Joubert;Olivier Felician;Emmanuel J Barbeau;Jean-Philippe Ranjeva

  • Patterns of cortical thinning in idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder.

    Shady Rahayel;Jacques Montplaisir;Oury Monchi;Christophe Bedetti

  • Evaluation De La Mémoire De Reconnaissance Visuelle: Normalisation d'une Nouvelle Épreuve en Choix Forcé (DMS48) Et Utilité en Neuropsychologie Clinique

    E Barbeau;E. Tramoni;S. Joubert;J. Mancini

  • Preserved visual recognition memory in an amnesic patient with hippocampal lesions.

    Emmanuel J. Barbeau;Olivier Felician;Sven Joubert;Anna Sontheimer

  • Face-specific impairment in holistic perception following focal lesion of the right anterior temporal lobe.

    Thomas Busigny;Thomas Busigny;Goedele Van Belle;Boutheina Jemel;Anthony Hosein

  • Single- and multiple-domain amnestic mild cognitive impairment: two sides of the same coin?

    Simona Maria Brambati;Sylvie Belleville;Marie-Jeanne Kergoat;Céline Chayer

  • Age effects shrink when motor learning is predominantly supported by nondeclarative, automatic memory processes: Evidence from golf putting

    Guillaume Chauvel;François Maquestiaux;Alan A Hartley;Sven Joubert

  • The role of the left anterior temporal lobe in the semantic processing of famous faces.

    Simona Maria Brambati;Sophie Benoit;Laura Monetta;Sylvie Belleville

Frequent Co-Authors

Emmanuel J. Barbeau
Emmanuel J. Barbeau Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Simona Maria Brambati
Simona Maria Brambati University of Montreal
Louis Bherer
Louis Bherer University of Montreal
Carol Hudon
Carol Hudon Université Laval
Sylvie Belleville
Sylvie Belleville University of Montreal
Ronald B. Postuma
Ronald B. Postuma McGill University
Howard Chertkow
Howard Chertkow Rotman Research Institute
Julie Carrier
Julie Carrier University of Montreal
Oury Monchi
Oury Monchi University of Montreal
Julien Cohen-Adad
Julien Cohen-Adad Polytechnique Montréal

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to a variety of rewarding careers beyond traditional roles. Many students leverage their backgrounds to pursue fields such as counseling, social work, and education. One prominent pathway is speech-language pathology, which blends psychology and communication sciences.

If you're interested in becoming a speech-language pathologist, state requirements can vary. For example, aspiring professionals can learn more about how to become a speech language pathologist in South Carolina, while those in the Midwest can review the South Dakota speech pathologist certification requirements. Each state outlines specific educational credentials, clinical experience, and licensing exams.

For anyone looking to advance in this field, researching becoming a speech therapist in Tennessee or Texas slp certification requirements can provide helpful insights into curriculum, practicum hours, and state-specific certification steps.

Online degrees make it easier than ever to start these career pathways, offering flexible access to accredited programs and allowing you to balance education with other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Sven Joubert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles