World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
74
Citations
23830
World Ranking
1862
National Ranking
92

Medicine

D-Index
78
Citations
26219
World Ranking
17921
National Ranking
596

Olivier Piguet publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Olivier Piguet sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 342 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Olivier Piguet D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Olivier Piguet sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Olivier Piguet is affiliated with the University of Sydney in Australia and has a research focus centered primarily on dementia and related neurological disorders. Their academic work spans the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with a significant emphasis on Psychiatry and Mental Health, Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Physiology, and Molecular Biology.

Their research topics include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research, Alzheimer's disease research and treatments, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research, Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism, Mental Health and Psychiatry, Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments, and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies.

Olivier Piguet's recent publications reflect a concentrated interest in frontotemporal dementia and neurodegenerative diseases. Notable papers include:

  • Recommendations to distinguish behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia from psychiatric disorders (2020, Brain)
  • Dementia in Latin America: Paving the way toward a regional action plan (2020, Alzheimer's & Dementia)
  • Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (2023, Nature Reviews Disease Primers)
  • CYLD is a causative gene for frontotemporal dementia - amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (2020, Brain)
  • Altered serum protein levels in frontotemporal dementia and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis indicate calcium and immunity dysregulation (2020, Scientific Reports)

Frequent collaborators in their research include John R. Hodges, Muireann Irish, Rebekah M. Ahmed, Glenda M. Halliday, and Fiona Kumfor. This network of coauthors indicates active involvement in multidisciplinary studies related to neurodegenerative conditions.

The venues where Olivier Piguet most often publishes highlight their engagement with respected journals in neurology and neuroscience. These venues include Alzheimer's & Dementia, Cortex, Journal of Neurology, Brain Communications, and Scientific Reports.

Best Publications

  • Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia.

    Katya Rascovsky;John R. Hodges;David Knopman;Mario F. Mendez

  • Behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia: diagnosis, clinical staging, and management

    Olivier Piguet;Michael Hornberger;Eneida Mioshi;John R Hodges

  • Considering the role of semantic memory in episodic future thinking: evidence from semantic dementia

    Muireann Irish;Muireann Irish;Muireann Irish;Donna Rose Addis;Donna Rose Addis;John R. Hodges;John R. Hodges;John R. Hodges;Olivier Piguet;Olivier Piguet;Olivier Piguet

  • The Pivotal Role of Semantic Memory in Remembering the Past and Imagining the Future

    Muireann Irish;Muireann Irish;Muireann Irish;Olivier Piguet;Olivier Piguet;Olivier Piguet

  • Frontotemporal dementia and its subtypes: a genome-wide association study

    Raffaele Ferrari;Raffaele Ferrari;Dena G Hernandez;Dena G Hernandez;Michael A Nalls;Jonathan D Rohrer

  • Subtypes of progressive aphasia: application of the International Consensus Criteria and validation using β-amyloid imaging.

    Cristian E. Leyton;Victor L. Villemagne;Sharon Savage;Kerryn E. Pike;Kerryn E. Pike

  • Gait slowing as a predictor of incident dementia: 6-year longitudinal data from the Sydney Older Persons Study.

    L.M. Waite;D.A. Grayson;O. Piguet;H. Creasey

  • Recommendations to distinguish behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia from psychiatric disorders

    Simon Ducharme;Annemiek Dols;Robert Laforce;Emma Devenney

  • Recent Developments in TSPO PET Imaging as A Biomarker of Neuroinflammation in Neurodegenerative Disorders.

    Eryn L. Werry;Fiona M. Bright;Olivier Piguet;Lars M. Ittner

  • Neuroinflammation in frontotemporal dementia.

    Fiona Bright;Eryn L. Werry;Carol Dobson-Stone;Carol Dobson-Stone;Olivier Piguet;Olivier Piguet

  • Profiles of recent autobiographical memory retrieval in semantic dementia, behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia, and Alzheimer's disease.

    M. Irish;M. Hornberger;M. Hornberger;S. Lah;L. Miller;L. Miller

  • Episodic memory in frontotemporal dementia: a critical review

    Michael Hornberger;Olivier Piguet;Olivier Piguet

  • How preserved is episodic memory in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia

    M. Hornberger;O. Piguet;O. Piguet;O. Piguet;A. J. Graham;A. J. Graham;P. J. Nestor;P. J. Nestor

  • Cognition in healthy aging is related to regional white matter integrity, but not cortical thickness

    David A. Ziegler;Olivier Piguet;David H. Salat;Keyma Prince

  • On the right side? A longitudinal study of left- versus right-lateralized semantic dementia

    Fiona Kumfor;Fiona Kumfor;Ramon Landin-Romero;Emma Devenney;Emma Devenney;Rosalind Hutchings;Rosalind Hutchings

  • Dementia in Latin America: Assessing the present and envisioning the future

    Mario A. Parra;Sandra Baez;Ricardo Allegri;Ricardo Nitrini

  • Eating and hypothalamus changes in behavioral-variant frontotemporal dementia

    Olivier Piguet;Olivier Piguet;Åsa Petersén;Bonnie Yin Ka Lam;Bonnie Yin Ka Lam;Sanaz Gabery

  • Distinguishing subtypes in primary progressive aphasia: application of the Sydney language battery

    Sharon A Savage;Sharpley Hsieh;Sharpley Hsieh;Felicity V C Leslie;Felicity V C Leslie;David Foxe;David Foxe

  • Lost in spatial translation - A novel tool to objectively assess spatial disorientation in Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia.

    Sicong Tu;Sicong Tu;Sicong Tu;Stephanie Wong;Stephanie Wong;Stephanie Wong;John R. Hodges;John R. Hodges;John R. Hodges;Muireann Irish;Muireann Irish;Muireann Irish

  • Right anterior temporal lobe dysfunction underlies theory of mind impairments in semantic dementia.

    Muireann Irish;Muireann Irish;Muireann Irish;John R. Hodges;John R. Hodges;John R. Hodges;Olivier Piguet;Olivier Piguet;Olivier Piguet

  • The impact of dementia severity on caregiver burden in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer disease.

    Eneida Mioshi;David Foxe;Felicity Leslie;Sharon Savage

  • Association of alleles carried at TNFA -850 and BAT1 -22 with Alzheimer's disease.

    Anastazija Gnjec;Anastazija Gnjec;Katarzyna J D'Costa;Katarzyna J D'Costa;Simon M Laws;Simon M Laws;Ross Hedley;Ross Hedley

Frequent Co-Authors

John R. Hodges
John R. Hodges University of Sydney
Muireann Irish
Muireann Irish University of Sydney
Glenda M. Halliday
Glenda M. Halliday University of Sydney
Fiona Kumfor
Fiona Kumfor University of Sydney
Michael Hornberger
Michael Hornberger University of East Anglia
Matthew C. Kiernan
Matthew C. Kiernan Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
John B.J. Kwok
John B.J. Kwok University of Sydney
Carol Dobson-Stone
Carol Dobson-Stone University of Sydney
Jillian J. Kril
Jillian J. Kril University of Sydney
Kirrie J. Ballard
Kirrie J. Ballard University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online psychology degrees open doors to diverse career paths in mental health, research, and behavioral therapy. One growing option is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA). This career typically requires an advanced degree in psychology or a related field, specialized coursework in applied behavior analysis, and supervised fieldwork.

Certification requirements for BCBAs vary by location. For details on Tulsa bcba requirements, students must meet specific academic and licensing standards set by local boards. Meanwhile, bcba certification requirements in Virginia Beach emphasize graduate-level education and a rigorous examination process. If you’re considering work in the nation’s capital, understanding the Washington DC bcba education requirements is crucial for licensure and practice. Similarly, those interested in Kansas can review Wichita bcba requirements to ensure they fulfill local standards.

No matter where you choose to study or work, researching the right online degree program and matching it with your preferred BCBA pathway is key to advancing your career in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Olivier Piguet

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles