World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
35
Citations
6303
World Ranking
9773
National Ranking
5168

Maria Hartwig publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maria Hartwig sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 69 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Maria Hartwig D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maria Hartwig sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Maria Hartwig is affiliated with John Jay College of Criminal Justice in the United States. Their research spans several fields including psychology and computer science, with a focus on subfields such as social psychology, artificial intelligence, information systems, clinical psychology, and political science and international relations.

The main topics addressed in their work encompass:

  • Deception detection and forensic psychology
  • Hate speech and cyberbullying detection
  • Information and cyber security
  • Policing practices and perceptions
  • Psychopathy, forensic psychiatry, sexual offending
  • Crime patterns and interventions
  • Memory processes and influences

Hartwig has published articles in various academic venues, with notable frequent publications in the following outlets:

  • Faculty Opinions - Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature
  • Law and Human Behavior
  • Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
  • Legal and Criminological Psychology
  • Torture Journal

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Hartwig include:

  • On the importance of a procedurally fair organizational climate for openness to change in law enforcement, 2020, Law and Human Behavior
  • Deception and lie detection in the courtroom: The effect of defendants wearing medical face masks, 2021, Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
  • The language of high-stakes truths and lies: Linguistic analysis of true and deceptive statements made during sexual homicide interrogations, 2022, Legal and Criminological Psychology
  • The manipulation of minds: reckoning with the legacy of the American post 9/11 torture program, 2022, Torture Journal
  • Faculty Opinions recommendation of Lie-telling for personal gain in children with and without externalizing behavior problems, 2022, Faculty Opinions - Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Laure Brimbal
  • Ben Bradford
  • Jonathan Jackson
  • E. C. S. Joseph
  • Aldert Vrij

Best Publications

  • Why Do Lie-Catchers Fail? A Lens Model Meta-Analysis of Human Lie Judgments.

    Maria Hartwig;Charles F Bond

  • Strategic use of evidence during police interviews: when training to detect deception works.

    Maria Hartwig;Pär Anders Granhag;Leif A. Strömwall;Ola Kronkvist

  • Guilty and innocent suspects’ strategies during police interrogations

    Maria Hartwig;Pär Anders Granhag;Leif A. Strömwall

  • Detecting deception via strategic disclosure of evidence.

    Maria Hartwig;Pär Anders Granhag;Leif A. Strömwall;Aldert Vrij

  • A new theoretical perspective on deception detection: On the psychology of instrumental mind-reading

    Pär Anders Granhag;Maria Hartwig

  • Lie Detection from Multiple Cues: A Meta-analysis

    Maria Hartwig;Charles F. Bond

  • INSIGHTFUL OR WISHFUL: Lawyers' Ability to Predict Case Outcomes

    Jane Goodman-Delahunty;Pär Anders Granhag;Maria Hartwig;Elizabeth F. Loftus

  • To act truthfully: Nonverbal behaviour and strategies during a police interrogation

    Leif A. Strömwall;Maria Hartwig;Pär Anders Granhag

  • Interrogating to detect deception and truth : effects of strategic use of evidence

    Maria Hartwig

  • The Detection of Deception in Forensic Contexts: Practitioners' beliefs about deception

    Leif A. Strömwall;Pär Anders Granhag;Maria Hartwig

  • Strategic use of evidence during investigative interviews: The state of the science

    Maria Hartwig;Pär Anders Granhag;Timothy Luke

  • Reading Lies: Nonverbal Communication and Deception.

    Aldert Vrij;Maria Hartwig;Pär Anders Granhag

  • Police officers' lie detection accuracy: interrogating freely versus observing video

    Maria Hartwig;Pär Anders Granhag;Leif A. Strömwall;Aldert Vrij

  • Impression and Information Management: On the Strategic Self- Regulation of Innocent and Guilty Suspects

    Maria Hartwig;Par Anders Granhag;Leif A. Stromwall;N. Doering

  • Imprisoned knowledge: Criminals' beliefs about deception

    Pär Anders Granhag;Lars O. Andersson;Leif A. Strömwall;Maria Hartwig

  • Eliciting cues to deception by tactical disclosure of evidence: The first test of the Evidence Framing Matrix

    Pär Anders Granhag;Leif A. Strömwall;Rebecca M. Willén;Maria Hartwig

  • Granting asylum or not? Migration board personnel's beliefs about deception

    Pär Anders Granhag;Leif A. Strömwall;Maria Hartwig

  • Suspicious minds: Criminals' ability to detect deception

    Maria Hartwig;Pär Anders Granhag;Leif A. Strömwall;Lars O. Andersson

  • Police Interrogation from a Social Psychology Perspective

    Maria Hartwig;Pär Anders Granhag;Aldert Vrij

  • Witnesses appearing live versus on video: effects on observers' perception, veracity assessments and memory

    Sara Landström;Pär Anders Granhag;Maria Hartwig

Frequent Co-Authors

Pär Anders Granhag
Pär Anders Granhag University of Gothenburg
Leif A. Strömwall
Leif A. Strömwall University of Gothenburg
Aldert Vrij
Aldert Vrij University of Portsmouth
Scott O. Lilienfeld
Scott O. Lilienfeld Emory University
Pekka Santtila
Pekka Santtila New York University Shanghai
Judee K. Burgoon
Judee K. Burgoon University of Arizona
Ray Bull
Ray Bull University of Derby
Samantha Mann
Samantha Mann University of Portsmouth
Jeffrey T. Hancock
Jeffrey T. Hancock Stanford University
N. Kenneth Sandnabba
N. Kenneth Sandnabba Åbo Akademi University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A degree in psychology can open a wide range of doors to online degrees and rewarding career pathways, especially in fields like social work, counseling, and human services. Many students choose to pursue a psychology foundation before advancing their education through specialized online degrees, such as a Master of Social Work (MSW) or related programs.

If you are considering becoming a social worker, it’s important to know that each state sets specific education and licensing requirements. For example, becoming a social worker in New Jersey requires a regionally accredited degree and state examination, while the process for becoming a social worker in New Mexico also emphasizes supervised experience and approved coursework.

Students interested in practicing in New York should familiarize themselves with the requirements to be a social worker in New York. Similarly, those targeting the Southeast should review the North Carolina social work education requirements.

By selecting the right degree and understanding your state’s requirements, you can confidently begin a fulfilling career in psychology and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Maria Hartwig

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles