World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
60
Citations
10699
World Ranking
3595
National Ranking
31

Pekka Santtila publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pekka Santtila sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 279 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Pekka Santtila D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pekka Santtila sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Pekka Santtila is affiliated with New York University Shanghai in China. Their research contributions are primarily situated within the field of psychology, with a focus on multiple subfields including clinical psychology, cognitive neuroscience, social psychology, sociology and political science, and psychiatry and mental health.

The scientist has a significant publication record across several topics, notably in:

  • Memory Processes and Influences
  • Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Deception detection and forensic psychology
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Child Abuse and Trauma

Santtila's recent papers exhibit a strong interest in behavioral and social responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Their recent publications include:

  • "Politicization of COVID-19 health-protective behaviors in the United States: Longitudinal and cross-national evidence" (2021), published in PLoS ONE
  • "Intergenerational conflicts of interest and prosocial behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic" (2020), published in Personality and Individual Differences
  • "Predictors of adherence to public health behaviors for fighting COVID-19 derived from longitudinal data" (2022), published in Scientific Reports
  • "Intentions to be Vaccinated Against COVID-19: The Role of Prosociality and Conspiracy Beliefs across 20 Countries" (2022), published in Health Communication
  • "Lives versus Livelihoods? Perceived economic risk has a stronger association with support for COVID-19 preventive measures than perceived health risk" (2021), published in Scientific Reports

Research dissemination frequently appears in venues such as PLoS ONE, Psychology Crime and Law, Frontiers in Psychology, Sexes, and Applied Cognitive Psychology. The scientist has multiple publications spanning these journals, indicating an engagement with both psychological science and interdisciplinary fields related to behavior and law.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Santtila include:

  • Shumpei Haginoya
  • Georgios Abakoumkin
  • Edward P. Lemay
  • Maximilian Agostini
  • Jannis Kreienkamp

The breadth of Santtila's work covers theoretical and empirical aspects, with a sustained interest in social and clinical psychological processes, addressing both fundamental psychological functions and applied topics such as trauma and public health behaviors. Their collaborations and publication venues highlight an interdisciplinary approach combining psychology with social and political analyses.

Best Publications

  • Trust in government regarding COVID-19 and its associations with preventive health behaviour and prosocial behaviour during the pandemic: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study.

    Qing Han;Bang Zheng;Mioara Cristea;Maximilian Agostini

  • The adult body: how age, gender, and body mass index are related to body image

    Monica Ålgars;Pekka Santtila;Markus Varjonen;Katarina Witting

  • ORIGINAL RESEARCH—COUPLES' SEXUAL DYSFUNCTIONS: Female Sexual Dysfunction, Sexual Distress, and Compatibility with Partner

    Katarina Witting;Pekka Santtila;Markus Varjonen;Patrick Jern

  • Discrepancies between Sexual Desire and Sexual Activity: Gender Differences and Associations with Relationship Satisfaction

    Pekka Santtila;Ingrid Wager;Katarina Witting;Nicole Harlaar

  • Disordered eating and gender identity disorder: a qualitative study.

    Monica Ålgars;Katarina Alanko;Pekka Santtila;N Kenneth Sandnabba

  • Premature and Delayed Ejaculation: Genetic and Environmental Effects in a Population-Based Sample of Finnish Twins

    Patrick Jern;Pekka Santtila;Katarina Witting;Katarina Alanko

  • Female Sexual Function and Its Associations with Number of Children, Pregnancy, and Relationship Satisfaction

    Katarina Witting;Pekka Santtila;Katarina Alanko;Nicole Harlaar

  • Behavioural linking of stranger rapes

    Pekka Santtila;Jenny Junkkila;N. Kenneth Sandnabba

  • Common genetic effects of gender atypical behavior in childhood and sexual orientation in adulthood: a study of Finnish twins.

    Katarina Alanko;Pekka Santtila;Nicole Harlaar;Katarina Witting

  • Conflicted Gender Identity, Body Dissatisfaction, and Disordered Eating in Adult Men and Women

    Monica Ålgars;Pekka Santtila;N. Kenneth Sandnabba

  • Sexual behavior and social adaptation among sadomasochistically‐oriented males

    N. Kenneth Sandnabba;Pekka Santtila;Niklas Nordling

  • Sadomasochistically oriented behavior: diversity in practice and meaning.

    L Alison;P Santtila;N K Sandnabba;N Nordling

  • Variants of psychopathy in adult male offenders: A latent profile analysis.

    Andreas Mokros;Robert D. Hare;Craig S. Neumann;Pekka Santtila

  • Dynamics of verbal interaction between interviewer and child in interviews with alleged victims of child sexual abuse

    Julia Korkman;Pekka Santtila;N. Kenneth Sandnabba

  • Demographics, sexual behaviour, family background and abuse experiences of practitioners of sadomasochistic sex: a review of recent research

    N. Kenneth Sandnabba;Pekka Santtila;Laurence Alison;Niklas Nordling

  • Gender and Visibility of Sexual Cues Influence Eye Movements While Viewing Faces and Bodies

    Lauri Nummenmaa;Jari K. Hietanen;Pekka Santtila;Jukka Hyönä

  • Classifying homicide offenders and predicting their characteristics from crime scene behavior

    Pekka Santtila;Helinä Häkkänen;David Canter;Thomas Elfgren

  • Experiences of severe childhood maltreatment, depression, anxiety and alcohol abuse among adults in Finland

    Wail Rehan;Jan Antfolk;Ada Johansson;Ada Johansson;Patrick Jern;Patrick Jern

  • Politicization of COVID-19 health-protective behaviors in the United States: Longitudinal and cross-national evidence.

    Wolfgang Stroebe;Michelle R vanDellen;Georgios Abakoumkin;Edward P Lemay

  • Sexual Function and Attitudes Toward Surgery After Feminizing Genitoplasty

    Riitta Fagerholm;Pekka Santtila;Päivi J. Miettinen;Aino Mattila

  • Evaluation of the female sexual function index in a population based sample from Finland.

    Katarina Witting;Pekka Santtila;Patrick Jern;Markus Varjonen

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrick Jern
Patrick Jern Åbo Akademi University
N. Kenneth Sandnabba
N. Kenneth Sandnabba Åbo Akademi University
Andreas Mokros
Andreas Mokros Rolf C. Hagen Group
Pekka Niemi
Pekka Niemi University of Turku
Nicole Harlaar
Nicole Harlaar University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Jukka Corander
Jukka Corander University of Oslo
Brendan P. Zietsch
Brendan P. Zietsch University of Queensland
Laurence Alison
Laurence Alison University of Liverpool
Elias Eriksson
Elias Eriksson University of Gothenburg
Debra Lieberman
Debra Lieberman University of Miami

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering a degree in psychology, exploring related online programs and career pathways can open doors to rewarding opportunities, especially in social work. Both fields share a strong focus on understanding human behavior, supporting mental health, and improving community well-being.

Online social work degrees are becoming more accessible and affordable, making it easier for students to launch or advance their careers. If budget is a concern, there are several affordable social work programs in Iowa and most affordable social work degree programs in Indiana that offer high-quality instruction at a reduced cost.

Additionally, those seeking the cheapest social work programs in Kansas and affordable social work degrees in Little Rock can find flexible online options tailored to different career goals. By choosing a related online degree, you can develop key skills, expand your professional network, and prepare for roles in counseling, community outreach, or clinical support.

Best Scientists Citing Pekka Santtila

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles