World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Todd K. Shackelford

Todd K. Shackelford

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 83 1260 1113 765 658 491 28938

Todd K. Shackelford publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Todd K. Shackelford between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Todd K. Shackelford published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 17.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 40 publications in 2021. 14 of the 538 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 40. Peak 40 publications in 2021. 1996: 2 publications 1997: 10 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 4 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 16 publications 2005: 16 publications 2006: 22 publications 2007: 20 publications 2008: 37 publications 2009: 24 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 19 publications 2012: 28 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 29 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 34 publications 2018: 26 publications 2019: 25 publications 2020: 28 publications 2021: 40 publications 2022: 24 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 4 publications
1996 2025

538 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Todd K. Shackelford: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 2
1997 10
1998 1
1999 4
2000 9
2001 12
2002 11
2003 6
2004 16
2005 16
2006 22
2007 20
2008 37
2009 24
2010 16
2011 19
2012 28
2013 19
2014 16
2015 29
2016 15
2017 34
2018 26
2019 25
2020 28
2021 40
2022 24
2023 15
2024 10
2025 4
Total 538
Download as CSV

Todd K. Shackelford publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Todd K. Shackelford sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 491–500 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 491 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20 491
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Todd K. Shackelford D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Todd K. Shackelford sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82–83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112 83
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Todd K. Shackelford is a researcher affiliated with Oakland University in the United States, whose fields of study primarily cover Psychology and Social Sciences. Their work extends across several subfields, including Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, and Education.

The research topics pursued by Shackelford are diverse, with a major focus on Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior. Additional areas of study include Sexual function and dysfunction studies, Marriage and Sexual Relationships, Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology, Meat and Animal Product Quality, Animal Nutrition and Physiology, and Disability Education and Employment.

Shackelford has contributed to academic literature in various publication venues, with frequent appearances in:

  • Personality and Individual Differences
  • Meat and Muscle Biology
  • Archives of Sexual Behavior
  • Evolutionary Psychology
  • Evolution and Human Behavior

Some recent publications by Shackelford include:

  • "Human status criteria: Sex differences and similarities across 14 nations.", 2020, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • "Evolution and functions of human dance", 2021, Evolution and Human Behavior
  • "Proposed solutions to anthropogenic climate change: A systematic literature review and a new way forward", 2023, Heliyon
  • "Cross-cultural perception of female facial appearance: A multi-ethnic and multi-centre study", 2021, PLoS ONE
  • "Educational Support for Saudi Students with Learning Disabilities in Higher Education", 2020, Learning Disabilities Research and Practice

In collaboration, Shackelford frequently coauthors work with:

  • Mohaned G. Abed
  • Bernhard Fink
  • T. L. Wheeler
  • Virgil Zeigler-Hill
  • Gavin Vance

Shackelford has also contributed to book publications, including a title published by SAGE Publishing: Integration of evolutionary psychology with other disciplines (2020).

Best Publications

  • The Geographic Distribution of Big Five Personality Traits Patterns and Profiles of Human Self-Description Across 56 Nations

    David P. Schmitt;Jüri Allik;Robert R. McCrae;Verónica Benet-Martínez

  • Adaptations, exaptations, and spandrels.

    David M. Buss;Martie G. Haselton;Todd K. Shackelford;April L. Bleske

  • Personality and mate preferences : Five factors in mate selection and marital satisfaction

    Michael D. Botwin;David M. Buss;Todd K. Shackelford

  • From Vigilance to Violence: Mate Retention Tactics in Married Couples

    David M. Buss;Todd K. Shackelford

  • The Attractive Female Body Weight and Female Body Dissatisfaction in 26 Countries Across 10 World Regions: Results of the International Body Project I

    Viren Swami;David A Frederick;Toivo Aavik;Lidia Alcalay

  • A Half Century of Mate Preferences: The Cultural Evolution of Values

    David M. Buss;Todd K. Shackelford;Lee A. Kirkpatrick;Randy J. Larsen

  • Universal sex differences in the desire for sexual variety: Tests from 52 nations, 6 continents, and 13 islands

    David P. Schmitt

  • Susceptibility to Infidelity in the First Year of Marriage

    David M. Buss;Todd K. Shackelford

  • Human aggression in evolutionary psychological perspective

    David M. Buss;Todd K. Shackelford

  • Universal dimensions of human mate preferences

    Todd K. Shackelford;David P. Schmitt;David M. Buss

  • Jealousy and the nature of beliefs about infidelity: Tests of competing hypotheses about sex differences in the United States, Korea, and Japan

    David M. Buss;Todd K. Shackelford;Lee A. Kirkpatrick;Jae C. Choe

  • Patterns and Universals of Adult Romantic Attachment Across 62 Cultural Regions Are Models of Self and of Other Pancultural Constructs

    David P. Schmitt;Lidia Alcalay;Melissa Allensworth;Jüri Allik

  • Attractive Women Want it All: Good Genes, Economic Investment, Parenting Proclivities, and Emotional Commitment

    David M. Buss;Todd K. Shackelford

  • Forgiveness or breakup: Sex differences in responses to a partner's infidelity

    Todd K. Shackelford;David M. Buss;Kevin Bennett

  • Facial asymmetry as an indicator of psychological, emotional, and physiological distress.

    Todd K. Shackelford;Randy J. Larsen

  • Emotional reactions to infidelity

    Todd K. Shackelford;Gregory J. LeBlanc;Elizabeth Drass

  • Patterns and Universals of Mate Poaching Across 53 Nations: The Effects of Sex, Culture, and Personality on Romantically Attracting Another Person's Partner

    David P. Schmitt

  • Reasoning about dead agents reveals possible adaptive trends

    Jesse M. Bering;Katrina McLeod;Todd K. Shackelford

  • Facial Attractiveness and Physical Health

    Todd K Shackelford;Randy J Larsen

  • Cues to Infidelity

    Todd K. Shackelford;David M. Buss

Frequent Co-Authors

David M. Buss
David M. Buss The University of Texas at Austin
Virgil Zeigler-Hill
Virgil Zeigler-Hill Oakland University
Bernhard Fink
Bernhard Fink University of Vienna
David P. Schmitt
David P. Schmitt Kansas State University
Lisa L. M. Welling
Lisa L. M. Welling Oakland University
Marina Butovskaya
Marina Butovskaya Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology
Jennifer Vonk
Jennifer Vonk Oakland University
Martin Voracek
Martin Voracek University of Vienna
Kevin M. Beaver
Kevin M. Beaver Florida State University
Randy J. Larsen
Randy J. Larsen Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a Psychology degree in the USA can open doors to a variety of specialized pathways, including careers in speech-language pathology (SLP). This field blends psychology with communication sciences, offering meaningful roles in healthcare and education sectors.

Those interested in becoming an SLP should note that each state has unique certification standards. For example, the Connecticut speech pathologist certification requirements emphasize specific educational milestones and supervised clinical hours. In comparison, to learn how to become a speech language pathologist in Delaware, you'll need to review Delaware's licensing process and continuing education expectations.

Other states such as Florida and Georgia also maintain distinct routes for SLP certification. You can explore the slp requirements in Florida or research Georgia slp certification requirements to understand regional nuances.

Many accredited online programs now offer flexibility for aspiring psychologists and SLPs. Choosing the right online degree can prepare you for state licensure and a rewarding, impactful career supporting individuals’ communication and mental health needs.

Best Scientists Citing Todd K. Shackelford

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles