World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
52
Citations
11395
World Ranking
4974
National Ranking
528

Peter Gallagher publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Gallagher sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 156 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Peter Gallagher D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Gallagher sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Gallagher is affiliated with Newcastle University in the United Kingdom and specializes in multiple fields related to medicine and psychology. Their research focuses on psychiatry and mental health, experimental and cognitive psychology, cognitive neuroscience, physiology, and neurology. The main topics of their work include bipolar disorder and treatment, functional brain connectivity studies, mental health research topics, electroconvulsive therapy studies, schizophrenia research and treatment, dementia and cognitive impairment research, and salivary gland disorders and functions.

Gallagher has contributed significantly to several frequent publication venues, which include:

  • Bipolar Disorders
  • Psychological Medicine
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
  • Arthritis & Rheumatology
  • Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface

Their recent papers reflect a range of topics within their research scope:

  • Randomised controlled cognition trials in remitted patients with mood disorders published between 2015 and 2021: A systematic review by the International Society for Bipolar Disorders Targeting Cognition Task Force, 2022, Bipolar Disorders
  • Improvement of Severe Fatigue Following Nuclease Therapy in Patients With Primary Sjögren's Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial, 2020, Arthritis & Rheumatology
  • Deep learning-based automated speech detection as a marker of social functioning in late-life depression, 2020, Psychological Medicine
  • Processing speed and sustained attention in bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis, 2023, Bipolar Disorders
  • Neuropsychological Impairments and Their Cognitive Architecture in Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) with Lewy Bodies and MCI-Alzheimer's Disease, 2021, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

Gallagher frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including:

  • Bethany Little
  • Kamilla Woznica Miskowiak
  • Allan H. Young
  • Lars Vedel Kessing
  • Richard Porter

The Scientist's dominant fields of study show a concentration on medicine with 43 publications and psychology with 19 publications. They have made notable contributions in psychiatry and mental health with 27 publications, followed by experimental and cognitive psychology with 13, and cognitive neuroscience with 10.

Best Publications

  • A meta-analysis of cognitive deficits in euthymic patients with bipolar disorder

    Lucy J. Robinson;Jill M. Thompson;Peter Gallagher;Utpal Goswami

  • Neurocognitive impairment in drug-free patients with major depressive disorder

    Richard J Porter;Peter Gallagher;Jill M Thompson;Allan H Young

  • Neuropsychological testing of cognitive impairment in euthymic bipolar disorder: an individual patient data meta-analysis

    C. Bourne;C. Bourne;Ö. Aydemir;V. Balanzá-Martínez;E. Bora

  • Neurocognitive impairment in euthymic patients with bipolar affective disorder.

    Jill M. Thompson;Peter Gallagher;John H. Hughes;Stuart Watson

  • Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function in patients with bipolar disorder

    Stuart Watson;Peter Gallagher;James C. Ritchie;I. Nicol Ferrier

  • Improvements in Neurocognitive Function and Mood Following Adjunctive Treatment with Mifepristone (RU-486) in Bipolar Disorder

    Allan H Young;Peter Gallagher;Stuart Watson;Dolores Del-Estal

  • Neuropsychological impairment in major depression: its nature, origin and clinical significance

    Richard J. Porter;Cecilia Bourke;Peter Gallagher

  • Elevation of the cortisol-dehydroepiandrosterone ratio in drug-free depressed patients.

    Allan H. Young;Peter Gallagher;Richard J. Porter

  • Efficacy of ECT: a meta-analysis.

    Philip G Janicak;John M. Davis;Robert D. Gibbons;Stephen Ericksen

  • Fluid balance during and after an ironman triathlon.

    Dale Speedy;Timothy Noakes;Nicholas Kimber;Ian Rogers

  • Neuropsychological dysfunction, soft neurological signs and social disability in euthymic patients with bipolar disorder

    Utpal Goswami;Aditya Sharma;Udayan Khastigir;Ian Nicol Ferrier

  • Methodological recommendations for cognition trials in bipolar disorder by the International Society for Bipolar Disorders Targeting Cognition Task Force.

    K W Miskowiak;K E Burdick;A Martinez-Aran;C M Bonnin

  • Corticosteroid-serotonin interactions in depression: a review of the human evidence

    Richard J. Porter;Peter Gallagher;Stuart Watson;Allan H. Young

  • Assessing and addressing cognitive impairment in bipolar disorder: the International Society for Bipolar Disorders targeting cognition task force recommendations for clinicians

    K W Miskowiak;K W Miskowiak;K E Burdick;A Martinez-Aran;C M Bonnin

  • Cannabinoids in bipolar affective disorder: a review and discussion of their therapeutic potential:

    C. H. Ashton;P. B. Moore;P. Gallagher;A. H. Young

  • Plasma cortisol-dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) ratios in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.

    Peter Gallagher;Stuart Watson;Margaret S. Smith;Allan H. Young

  • Prevalence of cognitive impairment in major depression and bipolar disorder.

    Katie M Douglas;Peter Gallagher;Lucy J Robinson;Janet D Carter

  • A comparison of neurocognitive impairment in younger and older adults with major depression.

    A. J. Thomas;P. Gallagher;L. J. Robinson;R. J. Porter

  • Assessing cortisol and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) in saliva: effects of collection method.

    Peter Gallagher;Melville M. Leitch;Anna E. Massey;R. Hamish McAllister-Williams

  • Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function in patients with chronic depression.

    S Watson;P Gallagher;D Del-Estal;A Hearn

  • Metabolic disease and cardiovascular risk in people treated with antipsychotics in the community.

    Paul Mackin;David Bishop;Helen Watkinson;Peter Gallagher

Frequent Co-Authors

Allan H. Young
Allan H. Young King's College London
I. Nicol Ferrier
I. Nicol Ferrier Newcastle University
Richard J Porter
Richard J Porter University of Otago
John T. O'Brien
John T. O'Brien University of Cambridge
Alan J. Thomas
Alan J. Thomas Newcastle University
Michael J. Firbank
Michael J. Firbank Newcastle University
Andrew M. Blamire
Andrew M. Blamire Newcastle University
John-Paul Taylor
John-Paul Taylor Newcastle University
Kamilla W. Miskowiak
Kamilla W. Miskowiak Copenhagen University Hospital
Marcus Kaiser
Marcus Kaiser University of Nottingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens the door to a wide range of online degrees and career pathways in fields like counseling, mental health, education, and research. Online programs offer flexibility for students balancing their studies with work or family, and they are increasingly recognized by employers and professional boards.

When considering an online psychology or counseling degree, it’s important to research regional differences in program rankings and specialization options. For example, you can explore the best counseling program rankings in Ohio or compare these with the best counseling program rankings in Oklahoma to find schools that fit your interests and career goals.

Some metropolitan areas stand out for their diverse and highly ranked offerings. Students considering urban experiences can look into Saint Louis counseling degree programs, or if looking for options on the West Coast, review the best counseling program rankings in San Diego.

Ultimately, choosing a program aligned with your location, specialization, and career aspirations will set you on a rewarding pathway in psychology or counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Gallagher

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles