World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 70 2292 2092 1331 1187 210 16293

Katherine E. Burdick publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Katherine E. Burdick between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Katherine E. Burdick published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 9.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2019. 28 of the 250 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2019. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 4 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 24 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 19 publications
2000 2025

250 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Katherine E. Burdick: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 1
2002 1
2003 0
2004 1
2005 4
2006 9
2007 9
2008 8
2009 10
2010 11
2011 9
2012 4
2013 12
2014 12
2015 11
2016 7
2017 15
2018 12
2019 24
2020 15
2021 19
2022 18
2023 9
2024 9
2025 19
Total 250
Download as CSV

Katherine E. Burdick publications per year - data summary

  • Katherine E. Burdick, a Psychology scholar from Brigham and Women's Hospital, has 250 publications recorded across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2000 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2019, with 24 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2004, with 1 publication each.
  • 1 of the 26 years in the span carries no publications at all (2003).
  • The rate of publication averages 9.6 papers per year over the whole span, or 10.0 per year counting only the 25 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 74 publications, 30% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2000-2008: 34 publications (3.8 per year); 2009-2017: 91 publications (10.1 per year); 2018-2025: 125 publications (15.6 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Katherine E. Burdick publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Katherine E. Burdick sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 201–210 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 210 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328 210
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Katherine E. Burdick publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Katherine E. Burdick, a Psychology scholar from Brigham and Women's Hospital, records 210 publications - the 72nd percentile of the discipline.
  • 72% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Katherine E. Burdick, and about 28% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Katherine E. Burdick ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Katherine E. Burdick D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Katherine E. Burdick sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 70–71 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215 70
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Katherine E. Burdick D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Katherine E. Burdick, a Psychology scholar from Brigham and Women's Hospital, records 70 D-Index - the 81st percentile of the discipline.
  • 81% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Katherine E. Burdick, and about 19% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Katherine E. Burdick ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Katherine E. Burdick is affiliated with Brigham and Women's Hospital in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of medicine, with a particular focus on psychiatry and mental health. Other subfields of interest include experimental and cognitive psychology, speech and hearing, genetics, and clinical psychology.

Burdick's work has concentrated extensively on topics related to bipolar disorder and its treatment, schizophrenia research and treatment, adolescent and pediatric healthcare, electroconvulsive therapy studies, mental health research topics, tryptophan and brain disorders, and functional brain connectivity studies.

The scientist has contributed to a number of research papers in recent years, including:

  • "Macro and micro sleep architecture and cognitive performance in older adults," 2020, published in Nature Human Behaviour
  • "The Engagement Problem: a Review of Engagement with Digital Mental Health Interventions and Recommendations for a Path Forward," 2023, published in Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry
  • "Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression: Scoping Review of User Engagement," 2022, published in Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • "Cognition in older adults with bipolar disorder: An ISBD task force systematic review and meta-analysis based on a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment," 2022, published in Bipolar Disorders
  • "Randomised controlled cognition trials in remitted patients with mood disorders published between 2015 and 2021: A systematic review by the International Society for Bipolar Disorders Targeting Cognition Task Force," 2022, published in Bipolar Disorders

Frequent co-authors include Caitlin E. Millett, Mark A. Frye, Melvin G. McInnis, Annemiek Dols, and Kamilla Woznica Miskowiak.

Burdick publishes regularly in several academic venues. The most frequent publication sources are:

  • Bipolar Disorders
  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
  • Neuropsychopharmacology

Best Publications

  • Genome-wide association meta-analysis in 269,867 individuals identifies new genetic and functional links to intelligence

    Jeanne E Savage;Philip R Jansen;Philip R Jansen;Sven Stringer;Kyoko Watanabe

  • Study of 300,486 individuals identifies 148 independent genetic loci influencing general cognitive function

    Gail Davies;Max Lam;Sarah E. Harris;Joey W. Trampush

  • Cognitive improvement after treatment with second-generation antipsychotic medications in first-episode schizophrenia: is it a practice effect?

    Terry E. Goldberg;Robert S. Goldman;Katherine E. Burdick;Anil K. Malhotra

  • Runs of homozygosity reveal highly penetrant recessive loci in schizophrenia

    Todd Lencz;Christophe Lambert;Pamela DeRosse;Katherine E. Burdick

  • Preliminary Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Pramipexole Added to Mood Stabilizers for Treatment-Resistant Bipolar Depression

    Joseph F. Goldberg;Katherine E. Burdick;Carrie J. Endick

  • High Frequencies of De Novo CNVs in Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia

    Dheeraj Malhotra;Dheeraj Malhotra;Shane McCarthy;Jacob J. Michaelson;Vladimir Vacic;Vladimir Vacic

  • Empirical evidence for discrete neurocognitive subgroups in bipolar disorder: clinical implications

    K. E. Burdick;M. Russo;S. Frangou;K. Mahon

  • GWAS meta-analysis reveals novel loci and genetic correlates for general cognitive function: a report from the COGENT consortium

    Joey W Trampush;M L Z Yang;J Yu;E. Knowles

  • The International Society for Bipolar Disorders-Battery for Assessment of Neurocognition (ISBD-BANC).

    Lakshmi N Yatham;Ivan J Torres;Gin S Malhi;Sophia Frangou

  • Iowa Gambling Task in schizophrenia: A review and new data in patients with schizophrenia and co-occurring cannabis use disorders

    Serge Sevy;Katherine E. Burdick;Hema Visweswaraiah;Sherif Abdelmessih

  • Molecular genetic evidence for overlap between general cognitive ability and risk for schizophrenia: A report from the Cognitive Genomics consorTium (COGENT)

    T Lencz;E Knowles;Gail Davies;S Guha

  • Cognitive and symptomatic predictors of functional disability in schizophrenia.

    Syed Shamsi;Adam Lau;Todd Lencz;Todd Lencz;Katherine E. Burdick;Katherine E. Burdick

  • Neurocognitive dysfunction and psychosocial outcome in patients with bipolar I disorder at 15-year follow-up.

    K. E. Burdick;J. F. Goldberg;M. Harrow

  • Genetic variation in DTNBP1 influences general cognitive ability

    Katherine E. Burdick;Todd Lencz;Birgit Funke;Christine T. Finn

  • A role for white matter abnormalities in the pathophysiology of bipolar disorder.

    Katie Mahon;Katherine E. Burdick;Katherine E. Burdick;Philip R. Szeszko;Philip R. Szeszko

  • Methodological recommendations for cognition trials in bipolar disorder by the International Society for Bipolar Disorders Targeting Cognition Task Force.

    K W Miskowiak;K E Burdick;A Martinez-Aran;C M Bonnin

  • The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery in Patients with Bipolar I Disorder

    Katherine E Burdick;Terry E Goldberg;Terry E Goldberg;Terry E Goldberg;Barbara A Cornblatt;Barbara A Cornblatt;Barbara A Cornblatt;Richard S Keefe

  • Characterizing cognitive heterogeneity on the schizophrenia-bipolar disorder spectrum

    T Van Rheenen;KE Lewandowski;EJ Tan;LH Ospina

  • Assessing and addressing cognitive impairment in bipolar disorder: the International Society for Bipolar Disorders targeting cognition task force recommendations for clinicians

    K W Miskowiak;K W Miskowiak;K E Burdick;A Martinez-Aran;C M Bonnin

  • Adoption of Mobile Apps for Depression and Anxiety: Cross-Sectional Survey Study on Patient Interest and Barriers to Engagement

    Jessica Lipschitz;Jessica Lipschitz;Christopher J Miller;Christopher J Miller;Timothy P Hogan;Timothy P Hogan;Katherine E Burdick;Katherine E Burdick

  • Cognition and disability in bipolar disorder: lessons from schizophrenia research

    Philip D Harvey;Aliza P Wingo;Katherine E Burdick;Katherine E Burdick;Katherine E Burdick;Ross J Baldessarini

  • Assessing cognitive deficits in bipolar disorder: are self-reports valid?

    Katherine E. Burdick;Carrie J. Endick;Joseph F. Goldberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Anil K. Malhotra
Anil K. Malhotra Hofstra University
Todd Lencz
Todd Lencz Feinstein Institute for Medical Research
Ole A. Andreassen
Ole A. Andreassen Oslo University Hospital
Aarno Palotie
Aarno Palotie University of Helsinki
Panos Roussos
Panos Roussos Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Vidar M. Steen
Vidar M. Steen University of Bergen
Ingrid Melle
Ingrid Melle University of Oslo
Srdjan Djurovic
Srdjan Djurovic Oslo University Hospital
Thomas Espeseth
Thomas Espeseth University of Oslo
Johan G. Eriksson
Johan G. Eriksson National University of Singapore

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing psychology in the USA opens up diverse academic and career opportunities, both on campus and online. Online psychology degrees can provide the flexibility needed for students balancing work, family, or other commitments. Many accredited programs are designed to fulfill state requirements for becoming a licensed therapist, though specific prerequisites can vary depending on your location.

For example, those interested in how to become a licensed therapist in Corpus Christi should familiarize themselves with Texas regulations. Similarly, Dallas licensed therapist education requirements highlight the need for specific coursework and supervised clinical hours.

Requirements for becoming a licensed therapist in Denver differ from those in Texas, as does the process for meeting licensed therapist requirements in Detroit. Prospective students should carefully review state guidelines and select programs that align with local licensure needs. With proper planning, an online psychology degree can be a powerful step toward a rewarding career in mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Katherine E. Burdick

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles