World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
46
Citations
10193
World Ranking
6622
National Ranking
2875

Jennifer L. Whistler publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jennifer L. Whistler sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 102 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Jennifer L. Whistler D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jennifer L. Whistler sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jennifer L. Whistler is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their research spans multiple scientific fields including Neuroscience, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Medicine. The work focuses on understanding receptor mechanisms, signaling pathways, and neuropeptide dynamics.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Neuroscience
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Medicine

Whistler's research engages with several specialized subfields such as Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, General Health Professions, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, and Surgery. The topics they most frequently explore cover a broad spectrum of receptor-related and neuroscience issues, including:

  • Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects
  • Gut microbiota and health
  • Diabetes Treatment and Management

Their scholarly output includes publications in various peer-reviewed journals and venues, with frequent contributions published in:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Progress in Community Health Partnerships
  • UNC Libraries
  • Nature Neuroscience

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Jennifer L. Whistler include:

  • Pharmacological and genetic manipulations at the µ-opioid receptor reveal arrestin-3 engagement limits analgesic tolerance and does not exacerbate respiratory depression in mice, 2021, Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Unlocking opioid neuropeptide dynamics with genetically encoded biosensors, 2024, Nature Neuroscience
  • Arrestin-3 Agonism at Dopamine D3 Receptors Defines a Subclass of Second-Generation Antipsychotics That Promotes Drug Tolerance, 2023, Biological Psychiatry
  • A Balancing Act: Learning from the Past to Build a Future-Focused Opioid Strategy, 2023, Annual Review of Physiology
  • Deletion of arrestin-3 does not reduce drug-seeking behavior in a longitudinal paradigm of oral morphine self-administration, 2024, Frontiers in Pharmacology

Frequent collaborators in their research efforts include:

  • Anirudh Gaur
  • Elinor Lewis
  • Lindsey Felth
  • Randi Foxall
  • Izabella Sall

Best Publications

  • Single cocaine exposure in vivo induces long-term potentiation in dopamine neurons

    Mark A. Ungless;Jennifer L. Whistler;Robert C. Malenka;Antonello Bonci

  • Functional dissociation of mu opioid receptor signaling and endocytosis: implications for the biology of opiate tolerance and addiction

    Jennifer L Whistler;Huai-hu Chuang;Peter Chu;Lily Y Jan

  • Regulation of opioid receptor trafficking and morphine tolerance by receptor oligomerization.

    Li He;Jamie Fong;Mark von Zastrow;Jennifer L Whistler

  • Modulation of Postendocytic Sorting of G Protein-Coupled Receptors

    Jennifer L. Whistler;Johan Enquist;Aaron Marley;Jamie Fong

  • Morphine-activated opioid receptors elude desensitization by β-arrestin

    Jennifer L. Whistler;Mark von Zastrow

  • Endocytosis of the Mu Opioid Receptor Reduces Tolerance and a Cellular Hallmark of Opiate Withdrawal

    Andrew K Finn;Jennifer L Whistler

  • A heterodimer-selective agonist shows in vivo relevance of G protein-coupled receptor dimers

    Maria Waldhoer;Jamie Fong;Robert M. Jones;Mary M. Lunzer

  • Opioid receptors.

    Unknown

  • The role of mu opioid receptor desensitization and endocytosis in morphine tolerance and dependence.

    Lene Martini;Jennifer L Whistler

  • GPR55 ligands promote receptor coupling to multiple signalling pathways

    Christopher M Henstridge;Nariman Ab Balenga;Ralf Schröder;Julia K Kargl

  • A library of 7TM receptor C-terminal tails. Interactions with the proposed post-endocytic sorting proteins ERM-binding phosphoprotein 50 (EBP50), N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor (NSF), sorting nexin 1 (SNX1), and G protein-coupled receptor-associated sorting protein (GASP).

    Arne Heydorn;Birgitte P. Søndergaard;Bjarne Ersbøll;Birgitte Holst

  • Dopamine responsiveness is regulated by targeted sorting of D2 receptors

    Selena E. Bartlett;Johan Enquist;Johan Enquist;Frederic W. Hopf;Josephine H. Lee

  • μ-Opioid Receptors: Ligand-Dependent Activation of Potassium Conductance, Desensitization, and Internalization

    Veronica A. Alvarez;Seksiri Arttamangkul;Vu Dang;Abdallah Salem;Abdallah Salem

  • Ligand-induced down-regulation of the cannabinoid 1 receptor is mediated by the G-protein-coupled receptor-associated sorting protein GASP1

    Lene Martini;Maria Waldhoer;Margareta Pusch;Viktor Kharazia

  • Real-time trafficking and signaling of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor.

    Sarah Noerklit Roed;Sarah Noerklit Roed;Pernille Wismann;Christina Rye Underwood;Nikolaj Kulahin

  • Dynorphin Controls the Gain of an Amygdalar Anxiety Circuit

    Nicole A. Crowley;Daniel W. Bloodgood;J. Andrew Hardaway;Alexis M. Kendra

  • Beclin 2 Functions in Autophagy, Degradation of G Protein-Coupled Receptors, and Metabolism

    Congcong He;Yongjie Wei;Kai Sun;Binghua Li

  • Dissociation of functional roles of dynamin in receptor-mediated endocytosis and mitogenic signal transduction.

    Jennifer L. Whistler;Mark von Zastrow

  • The Carboxyl Terminus of Human Cytomegalovirus-encoded 7 Transmembrane Receptor US28 Camouflages Agonism by Mediating Constitutive Endocytosis *

    Maria Waldhoer;Maria Waldhoer;Paola Casarosa;Mette M. Rosenkilde;Martine J. Smit

  • A Molecular Basis of Analgesic Tolerance to Cannabinoids

    Anke Tappe-Theodor;Nitin Agarwal;István Katona;Tiziana Rubino

  • An opiate cocktail that reduces morphine tolerance and dependence.

    Li He;Jennifer L. Whistler

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark von Zastrow
Mark von Zastrow University of California, San Francisco
Antonello Bonci
Antonello Bonci National Institute on Drug Abuse
Selena E. Bartlett
Selena E. Bartlett Queensland University of Technology
Evi Kostenis
Evi Kostenis University of Bonn
Viktor Kharazia
Viktor Kharazia University of California, San Francisco
Martine J. Smit
Martine J. Smit Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Bryan L. Roth
Bryan L. Roth University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Yoichi Ueta
Yoichi Ueta University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan
Michael J. Krashes
Michael J. Krashes National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering studying Neuroscience in the USA, exploring related online programs can open up diverse career pathways. Many students find certificate programs online to be a practical option for quickly gaining key skills relevant to health, psychology, or research roles. Certificates can often be completed in under a year, helping you enter the workforce or enhance your current role efficiently.

Looking for streamlined educational options? Some students opt for easy degrees to get online, which allow them to build a foundational knowledge base and qualify for entry-level science jobs. These degrees can also act as stepping stones to more advanced studies in neuroscience or related fields.

Affordability is a major concern for many learners. Programs like the cheapest online msw programs provide accessible routes into social work and mental health careers, both of which frequently interact with neuroscience principles. Similarly, those interested in behavior analysis might consider pursuing online bcba masters programs, which can lead to impactful roles in clinical and educational settings.

Best Scientists Citing Jennifer L. Whistler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles