World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
44
Citations
7498
World Ranking
7174
National Ranking
202

Selena E. Bartlett publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Selena E. Bartlett sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 140 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Selena E. Bartlett D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Selena E. Bartlett sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Selena E. Bartlett is affiliated with the Queensland University of Technology in Australia. Their research focuses primarily on the intersection of medicine and neuroscience, with particular attention to cellular and molecular neuroscience, physiology, public health, endocrinology, and neurology. Their work spans a broad range of topics related to diet, metabolism, neuroinflammation, neurodegeneration, and the influence of neurotransmitter receptors on behavior.

The main topics covered in Selena Bartlett's research include:

  • Diet and metabolism studies
  • Neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration mechanisms
  • Neurotransmitter receptor influence on behavior
  • Neuroscience and neuropharmacology research
  • Diet, metabolism, and disease
  • Nutritional studies and diet
  • Birth, development, and health

Selena Bartlett has contributed to several recent publications. Notable papers include:

  • The Impact of Free Sugar on Human Health-A Narrative Review (2023, Nutrients)
  • Long-Term Overconsumption of Sugar Starting at Adolescence Produces Persistent Hyperactivity and Neurocognitive Deficits in Adulthood (2021, Frontiers in Neuroscience)
  • A binge high sucrose diet provokes systemic and cerebral inflammation in rats without inducing obesity (2021, Scientific Reports)
  • Tumour Necrosis Factor in Neuroplasticity, Neurogenesis and Alcohol Use Disorder (2020, Brain Plasticity)
  • The Impact of Free and Added Sugars on Cognitive Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2023, Nutrients)

Common venues for Selena Bartlett's publications are:

  • Nutrients
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • Scientific Reports
  • Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
  • Molecular Psychiatry

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Kate Beecher
  • Arnauld Belmer
  • Kerri Gillespie
  • Fatemeh Chehrehasa
  • Eva Kemps

Best Publications

  • Intermittent Access to 20% Ethanol Induces High Ethanol Consumption in Long–Evans and Wistar Rats

    Jeffrey A. Simms;Pia Steensland;Brian Medina;Kenneth E. Abernathy

  • Varenicline, an α4β2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor partial agonist, selectively decreases ethanol consumption and seeking

    Pia Steensland;Jeffrey A. Simms;Joan Holgate;Jemma K. Richards

  • Opioid receptors.

    Unknown

  • Inhibition of orexin-1/hypocretin-1 receptors inhibits yohimbine-induced reinstatement of ethanol and sucrose seeking in Long-Evans rats

    Jemma K. Richards;Jeffrey A. Simms;Pia Steensland;Sharif A. Taha

  • The impact of sugar consumption on stress driven, emotional and addictive behaviors.

    Angela Jacques;Nicholas Chaaya;Kate Beecher;Syed Aoun Ali

  • Varenicline decreases alcohol consumption in heavy-drinking smokers

    Jennifer M. Mitchell;Candice H. Teague;Andrew S. Kayser;Selena E. Bartlett

  • Dopamine responsiveness is regulated by targeted sorting of D2 receptors

    Selena E. Bartlett;Johan Enquist;Johan Enquist;Frederic W. Hopf;Josephine H. Lee

  • Orexin/hypocretin role in reward: implications for opioid and other addictions.

    Corey Baimel;Corey Baimel;Selena E Bartlett;Lih-Chu Chiou;Andrew J Lawrence

  • Neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors: neuroplastic changes underlying alcohol and nicotine addictions.

    Allison Anne Feduccia;Susmita Chatterjee;Selena E Bartlett

  • Ghrelin receptor (GHS-R1A) antagonism suppresses both operant alcohol self-administration and high alcohol consumption in rats

    Sara Landgren;Jeffrey A. Simms;Petri Hyytiä;Jörgen A. Engel

  • The excitatory effects of morphine-3-glucuronide are attenuated by LY274614, a competitive NMDA receptor antagonist, and by midazolam, an agonist at the benzodiazepine site on the GABAA receptor complex

    Selena E. Bartlett;Tess Cramond;Maree T. Smith

  • Long-Evans rats acquire operant self-administration of 20% ethanol without sucrose fading.

    Jeffrey A Simms;Jade J Bito-Onon;Susmita Chatterjee;Selena E Bartlett

  • Partial agonists of the α3β4* neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor reduce ethanol consumption and seeking in rats.

    Susmita Chatterjee;Pia Steensland;Jeffrey A Simms;Joan Holgate

  • Varenicline, a partial agonist at neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, reduces nicotine-induced increases in 20% ethanol operant self-administration in Sprague-Dawley rats.

    Jade J. Bito-Onon;Jeffrey A. Simms;Susmita Chatterjee;Joan Holgate

  • Molecular mechanisms regulating the retrograde axonal transport of neurotrophins.

    Anna J Reynolds;Selena E Bartlett;Selena E Bartlett;Ian A Hendry

  • Morphine-Induced Receptor Endocytosis in a Novel Knockin Mouse Reduces Tolerance and Dependence

    Joseph A. Kim;Selena Bartlett;Li He;Carsten K. Nielsen

  • Happyhour, a Ste20 Family Kinase, Implicates EGFR Signaling in Ethanol-Induced Behaviors

    Ammon B. Corl;Karen H. Berger;Galit Ophir-Shohat;Julie Gesch

  • Neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors as pharmacotherapeutic targets for the treatment of alcohol use disorders.

    Susmita Chatterjee;Selena Bartlett

  • Mifepristone in the Central Nucleus of the Amygdala Reduces Yohimbine Stress-Induced Reinstatement of Ethanol-Seeking

    Jeffrey A Simms;Carolina L Haass-Koffler;Jade Bito-Onon;Rui Li

  • The Ghrelin Signalling System Is Involved in the Consumption of Sweets

    Sara Landgren;Jeffrey A. Simms;Dag S. Thelle;Elisabeth Strandhagen

  • Varenicline decreases ethanol intake and increases dopamine release via neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in the nucleus accumbens

    Allison Feduccia;Jeffrey Simms;Douglas Mill;Henry Yi

  • The Dual Orexin/Hypocretin Receptor Antagonist, Almorexant, in the Ventral Tegmental Area Attenuates Ethanol Self-Administration

    Subhashini Srinivasan;Jeffrey A. Simms;Carsten K. Nielsen;Steven P. Lieske;Steven P. Lieske

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter G. Noakes
Peter G. Noakes University of Queensland
Mark C. Bellingham
Mark C. Bellingham University of Queensland
Antonello Bonci
Antonello Bonci National Institute on Drug Abuse
Michael M. Morgan
Michael M. Morgan Washington State University
Jennifer L. Whistler
Jennifer L. Whistler University of California, San Francisco
Markus Heilig
Markus Heilig Linköping University
Viktor Kharazia
Viktor Kharazia University of California, San Francisco
Melanie L. Schwandt
Melanie L. Schwandt National Institutes of Health
Reza Momenan
Reza Momenan National Institutes of Health
Stephanie L. Borgland
Stephanie L. Borgland University of Calgary

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

While studying neuroscience in the USA opens doors to cutting-edge research and clinical careers, there are several related online degrees you may also consider, especially if you’re interested in flexible learning or alternative pathways.

Many students with an interest in human behavior and mental health look at mft masters programs (Marriage and Family Therapy). These accredited online programs focus on therapeutic skills for those wishing to work with couples or families.

For broader psychology studies, pursuing a master in psychology online is a strong choice. This degree often leads to roles in counseling, research, or organizational development. If affordability is a priority, exploring the cheapest psychology degree online can help you start a new career without excessive student debt.

Another pathway is social work. Those interested in clinical, advocacy, or community-based roles may consider the easiest msw program (Master of Social Work), which prepares graduates for licensure and practical work in diverse settings.

These flexible online degrees offer excellent options for advancing your career or expanding your skill set alongside a neuroscience background.

Best Scientists Citing Selena E. Bartlett

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles