World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Kenneth B. Campbell

Kenneth B. Campbell

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
42
Citations
5457
World Ranking
7723
National Ranking
454

Kenneth B. Campbell publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth B. Campbell sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 118 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Kenneth B. Campbell D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth B. Campbell sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kenneth B. Campbell is affiliated with the University of Ottawa in Canada and has conducted research mainly in the fields of neuroscience, psychology, and medicine. Their scholarly output focuses significantly on cognitive neuroscience and related subfields such as experimental and cognitive psychology, clinical psychology, biomedical engineering, and surgery.

Campbell's research covers multiple main topics, including neuroscience and music perception, neural and behavioral psychology studies, hearing loss and rehabilitation, multisensory perception and integration, functional brain connectivity studies, suicide and self-harm studies, and child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development.

Their frequent publication venues include Clinical EEG and Neuroscience, Neurobiology of Aging, Frontiers in Psychiatry, Brain Research, and Brain and Cognition. Among these, Clinical EEG and Neuroscience has hosted the largest number of their publications.

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Campbell include the following:

  • "Active and Passive Attentional Processing in Adolescent Suicide Attempters: An Event-Related Potential Study" (2020) in Clinical EEG and Neuroscience
  • "Attentional Bias Deficits in Adolescent Suicide Attempters During an Emotional Stroop Task: An ERP Study" (2021) in Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • "Event-related potential evidence that very slowly presented auditory stimuli are passively processed differently in younger and older adults" (2021) in Neurobiology of Aging
  • "Emotional Modulation of Response Inhibition in Adolescents During Acute Suicidal Crisis: Event-Related Potentials in an Emotional Go/NoGo Task" (2021) in Clinical EEG and Neuroscience
  • "Effects of the Duration of a Resting-State EEG Recording in Healthy Aging and Mild Cognitive Impairment" (2020) in Clinical EEG and Neuroscience

They have collaborated frequently with several co-authors, such as Paniz Tavakoli, Addo Boafo, Farooq Kamal, Vanessa Taler, and Cassandra Morrison, contributing to multiple publications together.

Best Publications

  • Auditory evoked potentials from the human cochlea and brainstem.

    Picton Tw;Stapells Dr;Campbell Kb

  • Human auditory steady-state evoked potentials during selective attention

    Linden Rd;Picton Tw;Hamel G;Campbell Kb

  • Human auditory steady state evoked potentials during sleep.

    R. Linden;Kenneth Campbell;Gilles Hamel;Terence Picton

  • The use of evoked potentials in sleep research

    Ian M. Colrain;Kenneth B. Campbell

  • Reliability estimates for steady-state evoked potentials.

    Terence W Picton;Jiri Vajsar;Rosendo Rodriguez;Kenneth B Campbell

  • The evoked K-complex: all-or-none phenomenon?

    Celyne Bastien;Kenneth Campbell

  • Evoked potential correlates of human information processing

    K.B. Campbell;E. Courchesne;T.W. Picton;K.C. Squires

  • Event-related potentials and recognition memory for pictures and words: the effects of intentional and incidental learning.

    Nancy E. Noldy;Robert M. Stelmack;Kenneth B. Campbell

  • Total sleep deprivation and novelty processing: implications for frontal lobe functioning.

    Anik Gosselin;Joseph De Koninck;Kenneth B. Campbell

  • Event-related potential measures of the inhibition of information processing: II. The sleep onset period.

    Kenneth B Campbell;Ian M Colrain;Ian M Colrain

  • The role of the spindle in human information processing of high‐intensity stimuli during sleep

    Kimberly A. Cote;TinA. M. Epps;Kenneth B. Campbell

  • Intelligence, reaction time, and event-related potentials

    Patricia A. McGarry-Roberts;Robert M. Stelmack;Kenneth B. Campbell

  • The mismatch negativity to frequency deviant stimuli during natural sleep

    Derek H. Loewy;Kenneth B. Campbell;Célyne Bastien

  • Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.

    Alexandra Muller-Gass;Margaret Macdonald;Erich Schröger;Lauren Sculthorpe

  • Intelligence and the effects of perceptual processing demands, task difficulty and processing speed on P300, reaction time and movement time

    Michael Houlihan;Robert Stelmack;Kenneth Campbell

  • The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.

    Alexandra Muller-Gass;Robert M. Stelmack;Kenneth B. Campbell

  • Event-related potentials to tones in the absence and presence of sleep spindles

    Martin Elton;Oscar Winter;Dirk Heslenfeld;Derek Loewy

  • Scalp topography of the auditory evoked K-complex in stage 2 and slow wave sleep.

    Kimberly A. Cote;Duncan R. De Lugt;Susan D. Langley;Kenneth B. Campbell

  • Effects of rate of tone-pip stimulation on the evoked K-Complex.

    Célyne Bastien;Kenneth Campbell

  • Effects of sequential and temporal probability of deviant occurrence on mismatch negativity.

    Merav Sabri;Kenneth B. Campbell

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert M. Stelmack
Robert M. Stelmack University of Ottawa
Terence W. Picton
Terence W. Picton University of Toronto
Brian Levine
Brian Levine University of Toronto
Albert Kok
Albert Kok University of Amsterdam
Morris Moscovitch
Morris Moscovitch University of Toronto
Nicholas P. Spanos
Nicholas P. Spanos Carleton University
Richard R. Bootzin
Richard R. Bootzin University of Arizona
Cecile D. Ladouceur
Cecile D. Ladouceur University of Pittsburgh
Erich Schröger
Erich Schröger Leipzig University
Shauna L. Shapiro
Shauna L. Shapiro Santa Clara University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Kenneth B. Campbell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles