World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
31
Citations
3726
World Ranking
11211
National Ranking
542

Alexandra Bendixen publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexandra Bendixen sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 102 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Alexandra Bendixen D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexandra Bendixen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alexandra Bendixen is affiliated with Chemnitz University of Technology in Germany and has a focused research portfolio in the field of neuroscience, particularly concentrating on cognitive neuroscience. Their work spans several subfields including social psychology, automotive engineering, human-computer interaction, and biomedical engineering.

The research topics covered by Bendixen include:

  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Neuroscience and music perception
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Hearing loss and rehabilitation
  • Spatial cognition and navigation
  • Virtual reality applications and impacts
  • Tactile and sensory interactions

Bendixen has published extensively, with notable recent papers including:

  • "Evaluating the Effects of Virtual Reality Environment Learning on Subsequent Robot Teleoperation in an Unfamiliar Building" (2023) in IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • "Pupillometry in auditory multistability" (2021) in PLoS ONE
  • "Spatial Updating in Virtual Reality - Auditory and Visual Cues in a Cave Automatic Virtual Environment" (2022) in the 2022 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR)
  • "Low-high-low or high-low-high? Pattern effects on sequential auditory scene analysis" (2022) in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
  • "High visual salience of alert signals can lead to a counterintuitive increase of reaction times" (2024) in Scientific Reports

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Bendixen include:

  • Wolfgang Einhäuser
  • Sabine Grimm
  • Jan Grenzebach
  • Thomas G. G. Wegner
  • Georg Jahn

Their research is featured in a variety of publication venues such as:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Journal of Vision
  • IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • Psychophysiology
  • PLoS ONE

Best Publications

  • Early electrophysiological indicators for predictive processing in audition: a review.

    Alexandra Bendixen;Iria SanMiguel;Erich Schröger

  • Do N1/MMN, P3a, and RON form a strongly coupled chain reflecting the three stages of auditory distraction?

    János Horváth;János Horváth;István Winkler;Alexandra Bendixen

  • I Heard That Coming: Event-Related Potential Evidence for Stimulus-Driven Prediction in the Auditory System

    Alexandra Bendixen;Erich Schröger;István Winkler

  • Hearing Silences: Human Auditory Processing Relies on Preactivation of Sound-Specific Brain Activity Patterns

    Iria SanMiguel;Andreas Widmann;Alexandra Bendixen;Nelson Trujillo-Barreto

  • Regularity Extraction and Application in Dynamic Auditory Stimulus Sequences

    Alexandra Bendixen;Urte Roeber;Erich Schröger

  • Predictability effects in auditory scene analysis: a review.

    Alexandra Bendixen

  • Processing of abstract rule violations in audition.

    Erich Schröger;Alexandra Bendixen;Nelson J. Trujillo-Barreto;Urte Roeber

  • Multistability in auditory stream segregation: A predictive coding view

    István Winkler;Susan Denham;Robert Mill;Tamás M Bohm;Tamás M Bohm

  • Neuronal adaptation, novelty detection and regularity encoding in audition

    Manuel S. Malmierca;Maria V. Sanchez-Vives;Carles Escera;Alexandra Bendixen

  • Regular patterns stabilize auditory streams.

    Alexandra Bendixen;Susan L. Denham;Kinga Gyimesi;István Winkler

  • Rapid extraction of auditory feature contingencies

    Alexandra Bendixen;Wolfgang Prinz;János Horváth;Nelson J. Trujillo-Barreto

  • Modelling the Emergence and Dynamics of Perceptual Organisation in Auditory Streaming

    Robert W. Mill;Tamás M. Bőhm;Alexandra Bendixen;István Winkler

  • Predictive regularity representations in violation detection and auditory stream segregation: from conceptual to computational models.

    Erich Schröger;Alexandra Bendixen;Susan L. Denham;Robert W. Mill

  • Neurophysiological evidence of impaired musical sound perception in cochlear-implant users

    Pascale Sandmann;Pascale Sandmann;Andrea Kegel;Tom Eichele;Norbert Dillier

  • Prediction in the service of comprehension: modulated early brain responses to omitted speech segments.

    Alexandra Bendixen;Alexandra Bendixen;Mathias Scharinger;Antje Strauß;Jonas Obleser

  • Memory trace formation for abstract auditory features and its consequences in different attentional contexts.

    Alexandra Bendixen;Erich Schröger

  • The Time-Course of Auditory and Visual Distraction Effects in a New Crossmodal Paradigm.

    Alexandra Bendixen;Alexandra Bendixen;Sabine Grimm;Sabine Grimm;Leon Y. Deouell;Nicole Wetzel

  • Human auditory event-related potentials predict duration judgments.

    Alexandra Bendixen;Sabine Grimm;Erich Schröger

  • Effects of intermodal attention on the auditory steady-state response and the event-related potential.

    Katja Saupe;Andreas Widmann;Alexandra Bendixen;Matthias M. Müller

  • The auditory dynamic attending theory revisited: A closer look at the pitch comparison task.

    Anna-Katharina R. Bauer;Manuela Jaeger;Jeremy D. Thorne;Alexandra Bendixen

Frequent Co-Authors

István Winkler
István Winkler Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Erich Schröger
Erich Schröger Leipzig University
Jonas Obleser
Jonas Obleser University of Lübeck
Andreas G. Andreou
Andreas G. Andreou Johns Hopkins University
Andreas Widmann
Andreas Widmann Leipzig University
Sonja A. Kotz
Sonja A. Kotz Maastricht University
Leon Y. Deouell
Leon Y. Deouell Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Stefan Debener
Stefan Debener Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg
Gesa Hartwigsen
Gesa Hartwigsen Max Planck Society
Lutz Jäncke
Lutz Jäncke University of Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students passionate about psychology, exploring related online degrees can open up a range of rewarding career pathways. One popular option is a degree in social work, which shares foundational skills and theoretical frameworks with psychology. Social work degrees emphasize helping individuals and communities—roles that often intersect with psychological practice.

Choosing an online program offers flexibility and accessibility, making it easier to balance studies with work or other commitments. Students can research most valuable online social work degree programs in America to find nationally recognized options. Additionally, regional rankings, such as the best value online social work degrees in Connecticut, most valuable online social work degrees in Dubuque, and most valuable online social work programs in Indiana, can help students identify affordable and quality choices in their preferred location.

Whether you choose a career in clinical psychology, counseling, or social work, starting with the right program is key. Thorough research ensures your chosen path aligns with your career goals and delivers real value in the job market.

Best Scientists Citing Alexandra Bendixen

Trending Scientists