World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Erich Schröger

Erich Schröger

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 90 967 845 30 28 343 26460

Erich Schröger publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Erich Schröger between 1987 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Erich Schröger published across 39 years, from 1987 to 2025, averaging 10.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2013. 29 of the 400 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2013. 1987: 2 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 4 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 14 publications 2004: 17 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 20 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 23 publications 2010: 20 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 23 publications 2013: 27 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 15 publications
1987 2025

400 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Erich Schröger: publications per year, 1987 to 2025
Year Publications
1987 2
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 1
1993 4
1994 6
1995 5
1996 7
1997 5
1998 7
1999 6
2000 7
2001 13
2002 7
2003 14
2004 17
2005 11
2006 10
2007 20
2008 14
2009 23
2010 20
2011 15
2012 23
2013 27
2014 14
2015 14
2016 10
2017 12
2018 6
2019 4
2020 6
2021 14
2022 16
2023 11
2024 14
2025 15
Total 400
Download as CSV

Erich Schröger publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erich Schröger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 341–350 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 343 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85 343
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Erich Schröger D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erich Schröger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 90–91 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77 90
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - Member of Academia Europaea

Overview

Erich Schröger is affiliated with Leipzig University in Germany and specializes primarily in the fields of neuroscience and psychology, with a specific focus on cognitive neuroscience and experimental and cognitive psychology. Their publication record includes 91 works in neuroscience and 28 in psychology, demonstrating a concentrated research interest in brain function and behavior.

The scientist has explored various topics within neuroscience, including:

  • Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Multisensory perception and integration
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Urban Green Space and Health
  • Action Observation and Synchronization

Erich Schröger has contributed publications to several academic journals, with frequent appearances in:

  • Psychophysiology
  • European Journal of Neuroscience
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
  • People and Nature

A selection of recent papers includes:

  • The quest for the genuine visual mismatch negativity (vMMN): Event-related potential indications of deviance detection for low-level visual features, 2020, Psychophysiology
  • Omission related brain responses reflect specific and unspecific action-effect couplings, 2020, NeuroImage
  • The auditory brain in action: Intention determines predictive processing in the auditory system-A review of current paradigms and findings, 2021, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • The posterior auditory field is the chief generator of prediction error signals in the auditory cortex, 2021, NeuroImage
  • The more the merrier? Perceived forest biodiversity promotes short-term mental health and well-being-A multicentre study, 2023, People and Nature

Erich Schröger frequently collaborates with other researchers. Their common coauthors include:

  • Andreas Widmann
  • Sabine Grimm
  • Urte Roeber
  • Dagmar Müller
  • Gesa Hartwigsen

In addition to journal publications, Schröger has authored books published by Basiswissen Psychologie and Springer Nature, both titled Biologische Psychologie, released in 2022 and 2024 respectively.

Recognition for their work includes the award of Member of Academia Europaea in 2015.

Best Publications

  • Involuntary attention and distractibility as evaluated with event-related brain potentials.

    Carles Escera;Kimmo Alho;Erich Schröger;István Winkler Winkler

  • Brain Indices of Music Processing: Nonmusicians are Musical

    Stefan Koelsch;Tomas Gunter;Angela D. Friederici;Erich Schröger

  • Digital filter design for electrophysiological data--a practical approach.

    Andreas Widmann;Erich Schröger;Burkhard Maess

  • Differential contribution of frontal and temporal cortices to auditory change detection: fMRI and ERP results.

    Bertram Opitz;Teemu Rinne;Axel Mecklinger;D.Yves von Cramon

  • The mismatch negativity in cognitive and clinical neuroscience: theoretical and methodological considerations.

    Teija Kujala;Mari Tervaniemi;Erich Schröger

  • Superior Pre-Attentive Auditory Processing in Musicians

    Stefan Koelsch;Erich Schröger;Mari Tervaniemi

  • Development of a memory trace for a complex sound in the human brain

    Risto Näätänen;Erich Schröger;Sirel Karakas;Mari Tervaniemi

  • On the detection of auditory deviations: A pre-attentive activation model

    Erich Schröger

  • Prefrontal cortex involvement in preattentive auditory deviance detection: neuroimaging and electrophysiological evidence.

    Christian F. Doeller;Bertram Opitz;Axel Mecklinger;Christoph M. Krick

  • Pitch discrimination accuracy in musicians vs nonmusicians: an event-related potential and behavioral study.

    Mari Tervaniemi;Mari Tervaniemi;Viola Just;Stefan Koelsch;Andreas Widmann

  • Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of task-irrelevant sound change: a new distraction paradigm

    Erich Schröger;Christian Wolff

  • Early electrophysiological indicators for predictive processing in audition: a review.

    Alexandra Bendixen;Iria SanMiguel;Erich Schröger

  • Attentional orienting and reorienting is indicated by human event-related brain potentials

    Erich Schröger;Christian Wolff

  • Is there pre-attentive memory-based comparison of pitch?

    Thomas Jacobsen;Erich Schröger

  • A neural mechanism for involuntary attention shifts to changes in auditory stimulation

    Erich Schröger

  • Mismatch response of the human brain to changes in sound location

    Erich Schröger;Christian Wolff

  • Superior Formation of Cortical Memory Traces for Melodic Patterns in Musicians

    Mari Tervaniemi;Mika Rytkönen;Erich Schröger;Risto J. Ilmoniemi

  • Working memory controls involuntary attention switching: evidence from an auditory distraction paradigm.

    Stefan Berti;Erich Schröger

  • Suppression of the auditory N1 event-related potential component with unpredictable self-initiated tones: evidence for internal forward models with dynamic stimulation.

    Pamela Bäss;Thomas Jacobsen;Erich Schröger

  • Auditory distraction: event-related potential and behavioral indices

    Erich Schröger;M.-H Giard;Ch Wolff

Frequent Co-Authors

Andreas Widmann
Andreas Widmann Leipzig University
Sonja A. Kotz
Sonja A. Kotz Maastricht University
Alexandra Bendixen
Alexandra Bendixen Chemnitz University of Technology
Thomas Jacobsen
Thomas Jacobsen Helmut Schmidt University
István Winkler
István Winkler Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Mari Tervaniemi
Mari Tervaniemi University of Helsinki
Stefan Berti
Stefan Berti Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Risto Näätänen
Risto Näätänen University of Tartu
Burkhard Maess
Burkhard Maess Max Planck Society
Angela D. Friederici
Angela D. Friederici Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology studies in the USA opens doors to a variety of related online degrees and career pathways, especially in social work and human services. Many students interested in human behavior, mental health, or community service consider advancing with a social work degree, as it provides flexibility and several routes for specialization.

Accredited programs are available nationwide, offering opportunities for both undergraduate and graduate students. For example, the top social work degrees in North Dakota provide foundational knowledge and hands-on experience for those looking to work in rural or underserved areas. Meanwhile, students seeking programs in diverse urban environments might explore the best social work degrees in Philadelphia.

Regional differences can impact available specializations and placement opportunities. The best social work degrees in the Northeast place a strong focus on community practice and clinical preparation, while those interested in working with indigenous populations or rural communities might consider the best social work degrees in Oklahoma.

Choosing the right program can set you on a fulfilling career path in counseling, mental health, advocacy, or community leadership.

Best Scientists Citing Erich Schröger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles