World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
67
Citations
14029
World Ranking
2623
National Ranking
25

Neuroscience

D-Index
67
Citations
14029
World Ranking
2911
National Ranking
18

Teija Kujala publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Teija Kujala sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 198 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Teija Kujala D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Teija Kujala sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Teija Kujala is affiliated with the University of Helsinki in Finland and specializes in research primarily within the domains of psychology and neuroscience. Their work spans several subfields including developmental and educational psychology, cognitive neuroscience, statistics and probability, experimental and cognitive psychology, as well as psychiatry and mental health.

The scientist's research focuses on a range of core topics such as reading and literacy development, neuroscience and music perception, cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills, language development and disorders, neurobiology of language and bilingualism, hearing loss and rehabilitation, and phonetics and phonology research.

Recent scholarly contributions include papers published in recognized journals, highlighting diverse areas of their expertise. Notable recent papers are:

  • Prerequisites of language acquisition in the newborn brain, 2023, Trends in Neurosciences
  • Structural white matter connectometry of reading and dyslexia, 2021, NeuroImage
  • Atypical MEG inter-subject correlation during listening to continuous natural speech in dyslexia, 2020, NeuroImage
  • Infancy and early childhood maturation of neural auditory change detection and its associations to familial dyslexia risk, 2022, Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Poor neural and perceptual phoneme discrimination during acoustic variation in dyslexia, 2020, Scientific Reports

Teija Kujala frequently collaborates with a network of researchers including Paula Virtala, Anja Thiede, Eino Partanen, István Winkler, and Marja Laasonen. The volume of collaboration with these colleagues illustrates an active engagement within interdisciplinary research teams.

The researcher's work is often disseminated through a selection of journals that publish multiple studies from this author. Frequent venues include Clinical Neurophysiology, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, NeuroImage, and Scientific Reports.

Best Publications

  • The mismatch negativity in cognitive and clinical neuroscience: theoretical and methodological considerations.

    Teija Kujala;Mari Tervaniemi;Erich Schröger

  • Auditory processing that leads to conscious perception: A unique window to central auditory processing opened by the mismatch negativity and related responses

    Risto Näätänen;Teija Kujala;István Winkler;István Winkler;István Winkler

  • The mismatch negativity (MMN) - A unique window to disturbed central auditory processing in ageing and different clinical conditions

    R. Näätänen;R. Näätänen;R. Näätänen;T. Kujala;C. Escera;T. Baldeweg;T. Baldeweg

  • Brain responses reveal the learning of foreign language phonemes.

    Istvańn Winkler;Teija Kujala;Hannu Tiitinen;Päivi Sivonen

  • Plastic neural changes and reading improvement caused by audiovisual training in reading-impaired children

    T. Kujala;K. Karma;R. Ceponiene;S. Belitz

  • The discrimination of and orienting to speech and non-speech sounds in children with autism.

    Tuulia Lepistö;Teija Kujala;Raija Vanhala;Paavo Alku

  • Memory traces for words as revealed by the mismatch negativity.

    Friedemann Pulvermüller;Teija Kujala;Yury Shtyrov;Jaana Simola

  • Learning-induced neural plasticity of speech processing before birth

    Eino Partanen;Teija Kujala;Risto Näätänen;Risto Näätänen;Risto Näätänen;Auli Liitola

  • Prenatal music exposure induces long-term neural effects.

    Eino Partanen;Teija Kujala;Mari Tervaniemi;Mari Tervaniemi;Minna Huotilainen;Minna Huotilainen;Minna Huotilainen

  • Cross-modal reorganization of human cortical functions.

    Teija Kujala;Kimmo Alho;Kimmo Alho;Risto Näätänen

  • Mismatch negativity indicates vowel discrimination in newborns

    M Cheourluhtanen;Kimmo Alho;Teija Kujala;K Sainio

  • Basic auditory dysfunction in dyslexia as demonstrated by brain activity measurements

    Teija Kujala;Katja Myllyviita;Mari Tervaniemi;Kimmo Alho

  • Visual cortex activation in blind humans during sound discrimination

    Teija Kujala;Minna Huotilainen;Janne Sinkkonen;Antti I. Ahonen

  • The mismatch negativity: an index of cognitive decline in neuropsychiatric and neurological diseases and in ageing.

    Risto Näätänen;Risto Näätänen;Risto Näätänen;Teija Kujala;Kairi Kreegipuu;Synnöve Carlson;Synnöve Carlson;Synnöve Carlson

  • Electrophysiological evidence for cross-modal plasticity in humans with early- and late-onset blindness

    Kujala T;Alho K;Huotilainen M;Ilmoniemi Rj

  • Auditory and somatosensory event-related brain potentials in early blind humans

    T. Kujala;K. Alho;J. Kekoni;H. Hämäläinen

  • Discrimination of speech and of complex nonspeech sounds of different temporal structure in the left and right cerebral hemispheres.

    Yury Shtyrov;Teija Kujala;Satu Palva;Risto J. Ilmoniemi

  • Diagnostic subgroups of developmental dyslexia have different deficits in neural processing of tones and phonemes

    Thomas Lachmann;Stefan Berti;Teija Kujala;Erich Schröger

  • Background acoustic noise and the hemispheric lateralization of speech processing in the human brain: magnetic mismatch negativity study.

    Yury Shtyrov;Teija Kujala;Jyrki Ahveninen;Mari Tervaniemi

  • Auditory perception and attention as reflected by the brain event-related potentials in children with Asperger syndrome.

    T. Lepistö;S. Silokallio;T. Nieminen-von Wendt;P. Alku

Frequent Co-Authors

Risto Näätänen
Risto Näätänen University of Tartu
Minna Huotilainen
Minna Huotilainen University of Helsinki
Mari Tervaniemi
Mari Tervaniemi University of Helsinki
Paavo Alku
Paavo Alku Aalto University
Kimmo Alho
Kimmo Alho University of Helsinki
Yury Shtyrov
Yury Shtyrov Aarhus University
István Winkler
István Winkler Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Risto J. Ilmoniemi
Risto J. Ilmoniemi Aalto University
Oili Salonen
Oili Salonen University of Helsinki
Eero Pekkonen
Eero Pekkonen University of Helsinki

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens up a variety of online programs and career pathways, especially in counseling and mental health fields. Many students consider becoming Licensed Professional Counselors (LPCs), a role that requires meeting specific educational and licensure standards unique to each state.

The process to become an LPC involves completing accredited coursework, supervised clinical experience, and passing state exams. For example, students interested in the Southwest can review Oklahoma licensed professional counselor requirements to understand eligibility. If you’re focused on the Pacific Northwest, it's crucial to understand the lpc licensure requirements in Oregon.

Those looking at careers in the Northeast should examine the Pennsylvania licensed professional counselor requirements and Rhode Island lpc licensure requirements. Each state may have different prerequisites for supervised hours, exam types, and continuing education.

Exploring these paths can help you tailor your online degree to meet specific state requirements and prepare for a wide range of roles in counseling and mental health support.

Best Scientists Citing Teija Kujala

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles