World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 67 2623 2405 25 23 198 14029
Neuroscience 67 2911 2662 18 17 198 14029

Teija Kujala publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Teija Kujala between 1992 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Teija Kujala published across 35 years, from 1992 to 2026, averaging 6.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2019. 8 of the 223 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2019. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 4 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 7 publications 2026: 1 publication
1992 2026

223 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Teija Kujala: publications per year, 1992 to 2026
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 2
1994 0
1995 4
1996 1
1997 4
1998 4
1999 6
2000 5
2001 8
2002 2
2003 7
2004 7
2005 8
2006 6
2007 7
2008 5
2009 15
2010 9
2011 11
2012 8
2013 16
2014 4
2015 6
2016 6
2017 4
2018 8
2019 18
2020 8
2021 8
2022 3
2023 6
2024 8
2025 7
2026 1
Total 223
Download as CSV

Teija Kujala publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Teija Kujala sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 198 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343 198
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Teija Kujala D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Teija Kujala sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 66–67 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218 67
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Teija Kujala is affiliated with the University of Helsinki in Finland and specializes in research primarily within the domains of psychology and neuroscience. Their work spans several subfields including developmental and educational psychology, cognitive neuroscience, statistics and probability, experimental and cognitive psychology, as well as psychiatry and mental health.

The scientist's research focuses on a range of core topics such as reading and literacy development, neuroscience and music perception, cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills, language development and disorders, neurobiology of language and bilingualism, hearing loss and rehabilitation, and phonetics and phonology research.

Recent scholarly contributions include papers published in recognized journals, highlighting diverse areas of their expertise. Notable recent papers are:

  • Prerequisites of language acquisition in the newborn brain, 2023, Trends in Neurosciences
  • Structural white matter connectometry of reading and dyslexia, 2021, NeuroImage
  • Atypical MEG inter-subject correlation during listening to continuous natural speech in dyslexia, 2020, NeuroImage
  • Infancy and early childhood maturation of neural auditory change detection and its associations to familial dyslexia risk, 2022, Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Poor neural and perceptual phoneme discrimination during acoustic variation in dyslexia, 2020, Scientific Reports

Teija Kujala frequently collaborates with a network of researchers including Paula Virtala, Anja Thiede, Eino Partanen, István Winkler, and Marja Laasonen. The volume of collaboration with these colleagues illustrates an active engagement within interdisciplinary research teams.

The researcher's work is often disseminated through a selection of journals that publish multiple studies from this author. Frequent venues include Clinical Neurophysiology, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, NeuroImage, and Scientific Reports.

Best Publications

  • The mismatch negativity in cognitive and clinical neuroscience: theoretical and methodological considerations.

    Teija Kujala;Mari Tervaniemi;Erich Schröger

  • Auditory processing that leads to conscious perception: A unique window to central auditory processing opened by the mismatch negativity and related responses

    Risto Näätänen;Teija Kujala;István Winkler;István Winkler;István Winkler

  • The mismatch negativity (MMN) - A unique window to disturbed central auditory processing in ageing and different clinical conditions

    R. Näätänen;R. Näätänen;R. Näätänen;T. Kujala;C. Escera;T. Baldeweg;T. Baldeweg

  • Brain responses reveal the learning of foreign language phonemes.

    Istvańn Winkler;Teija Kujala;Hannu Tiitinen;Päivi Sivonen

  • Plastic neural changes and reading improvement caused by audiovisual training in reading-impaired children

    T. Kujala;K. Karma;R. Ceponiene;S. Belitz

  • The discrimination of and orienting to speech and non-speech sounds in children with autism.

    Tuulia Lepistö;Teija Kujala;Raija Vanhala;Paavo Alku

  • Memory traces for words as revealed by the mismatch negativity.

    Friedemann Pulvermüller;Teija Kujala;Yury Shtyrov;Jaana Simola

  • Learning-induced neural plasticity of speech processing before birth

    Eino Partanen;Teija Kujala;Risto Näätänen;Risto Näätänen;Risto Näätänen;Auli Liitola

  • Prenatal music exposure induces long-term neural effects.

    Eino Partanen;Teija Kujala;Mari Tervaniemi;Mari Tervaniemi;Minna Huotilainen;Minna Huotilainen;Minna Huotilainen

  • Cross-modal reorganization of human cortical functions.

    Teija Kujala;Kimmo Alho;Kimmo Alho;Risto Näätänen

  • Mismatch negativity indicates vowel discrimination in newborns

    M Cheourluhtanen;Kimmo Alho;Teija Kujala;K Sainio

  • Basic auditory dysfunction in dyslexia as demonstrated by brain activity measurements

    Teija Kujala;Katja Myllyviita;Mari Tervaniemi;Kimmo Alho

  • Visual cortex activation in blind humans during sound discrimination

    Teija Kujala;Minna Huotilainen;Janne Sinkkonen;Antti I. Ahonen

  • The mismatch negativity: an index of cognitive decline in neuropsychiatric and neurological diseases and in ageing.

    Risto Näätänen;Risto Näätänen;Risto Näätänen;Teija Kujala;Kairi Kreegipuu;Synnöve Carlson;Synnöve Carlson;Synnöve Carlson

  • Electrophysiological evidence for cross-modal plasticity in humans with early- and late-onset blindness

    Kujala T;Alho K;Huotilainen M;Ilmoniemi Rj

  • Auditory and somatosensory event-related brain potentials in early blind humans

    T. Kujala;K. Alho;J. Kekoni;H. Hämäläinen

  • Discrimination of speech and of complex nonspeech sounds of different temporal structure in the left and right cerebral hemispheres.

    Yury Shtyrov;Teija Kujala;Satu Palva;Risto J. Ilmoniemi

  • Diagnostic subgroups of developmental dyslexia have different deficits in neural processing of tones and phonemes

    Thomas Lachmann;Stefan Berti;Teija Kujala;Erich Schröger

  • Background acoustic noise and the hemispheric lateralization of speech processing in the human brain: magnetic mismatch negativity study.

    Yury Shtyrov;Teija Kujala;Jyrki Ahveninen;Mari Tervaniemi

  • Auditory perception and attention as reflected by the brain event-related potentials in children with Asperger syndrome.

    T. Lepistö;S. Silokallio;T. Nieminen-von Wendt;P. Alku

Frequent Co-Authors

Risto Näätänen
Risto Näätänen University of Tartu
Minna Huotilainen
Minna Huotilainen University of Helsinki
Mari Tervaniemi
Mari Tervaniemi University of Helsinki
Paavo Alku
Paavo Alku Aalto University
Kimmo Alho
Kimmo Alho University of Helsinki
Yury Shtyrov
Yury Shtyrov Aarhus University
István Winkler
István Winkler Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Risto J. Ilmoniemi
Risto J. Ilmoniemi Aalto University
Oili Salonen
Oili Salonen University of Helsinki
Eero Pekkonen
Eero Pekkonen University of Helsinki

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens up a variety of online programs and career pathways, especially in counseling and mental health fields. Many students consider becoming Licensed Professional Counselors (LPCs), a role that requires meeting specific educational and licensure standards unique to each state.

The process to become an LPC involves completing accredited coursework, supervised clinical experience, and passing state exams. For example, students interested in the Southwest can review Oklahoma licensed professional counselor requirements to understand eligibility. If you’re focused on the Pacific Northwest, it's crucial to understand the lpc licensure requirements in Oregon.

Those looking at careers in the Northeast should examine the Pennsylvania licensed professional counselor requirements and Rhode Island lpc licensure requirements. Each state may have different prerequisites for supervised hours, exam types, and continuing education.

Exploring these paths can help you tailor your online degree to meet specific state requirements and prepare for a wide range of roles in counseling and mental health support.

Best Scientists Citing Teija Kujala

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles