World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
33
Citations
4150
World Ranking
10604
National Ranking
609

Juanita Todd publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Juanita Todd sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 132 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Juanita Todd D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Juanita Todd sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Juanita Todd is affiliated with the University of Newcastle Australia in Australia and has contributed extensively to the field of neuroscience, particularly within cognitive neuroscience. Their research encompasses a variety of subfields including experimental and cognitive psychology, social psychology, nutrition and dietetics, and signal processing.

The scientist's main research topics include:

  • Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Multisensory perception and integration
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Juanita Todd has published papers in a range of well-regarded scientific journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • International Journal of Psychophysiology
  • Psychophysiology
  • Clinical EEG and Neuroscience
  • Scientific Reports
  • Hearing Research

Selected recent publications are:

  • "Making Sense of Mismatch Negativity," 2020, Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • "A study of factors affecting women's lived experiences in STEM," 2022, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
  • "Setting precedent: Initial feature variability affects the subsequent precision of regularly varying sound contexts," 2020, Psychophysiology
  • "Effect of Immune Activation during Early Gestation or Late Gestation on Inhibitory Markers in Adult Male Rats," 2020, Scientific Reports
  • "Do rat auditory event related potentials exhibit human mismatch negativity attributes related to predictive coding?," 2020, Hearing Research

Collaboration has been an important aspect of this researcher's work, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Mattsen Yeark (11 collaborations)
  • Bryan Paton (9 collaborations)
  • István Winkler (6 collaborations)
  • Patricia T. Michie (6 collaborations)
  • Lauren Harms (5 collaborations)

The main field of study for this scientist is neuroscience, where the total number of publications reaches 58. Within this domain, cognitive neuroscience represents the majority with 55 publications. Other subfields are experimental and cognitive psychology, social psychology, nutrition and dietetics, and signal processing, reflecting a broad interdisciplinary approach.

Best Publications

  • Deviant matters: duration, frequency, and intensity deviants reveal different patterns of mismatch negativity reduction in early and late schizophrenia.

    Juanita Todd;Patricia T. Michie;Ulrich Schall;Frini Karayanidis

  • Duration mismatch negativity in biological relatives of patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders.

    Patricia T Michie;Hamish Innes-Brown;Juanita Todd;Assen V Jablensky

  • Duration and frequency mismatch negativity in schizophrenia

    P.T. Michie;T.W. Budd;J. Todd;D. Rock

  • Making Sense of Mismatch Negativity.

    Kaitlin Fitzgerald;Juanita Todd

  • Gray Matter Deficits, Mismatch Negativity, and Outcomes in Schizophrenia

    Paul Rasser;Ulrich Schall;Juanita Todd;Patricia Michie

  • A randomised controlled trial of vaporised Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol alone and in combination in frequent and infrequent cannabis users: acute intoxication effects

    Nadia Solowij;Samantha J Broyd;Lisa-Marie Greenwood;Hendrika H van Hell

  • Auditory sensory memory and the aging brain: A mismatch negativity study.

    Rowena Jane Cooper;Juanita Todd;Katherine Margaret McGill;Patricia Therese Michie

  • Mismatch Negativity: Translating the Potential

    Juanita Todd;Lauren Harms;Ulrich Schall;Patricia T. Michie

  • Functional neuroanatomy of auditory mismatch processing: an event-related fMRI study of duration-deviant oddballs

    Ulrich Schall;Patrick J. Johnston;Juanita Todd;Philip B. Ward

  • Preliminary investigation of gene expression profiles in peripheral blood lymphocytes in schizophrenia.

    Nikola A. Bowden;Nikola A. Bowden;Judith Weidenhofer;Judith Weidenhofer;Rodney J. Scott;Ulrich Schall;Ulrich Schall

  • Mismatch negativity (MMN) reduction in schizophrenia-impaired prediction--error generation, estimation or salience?

    Juanita Todd;Patricia T. Michie;Ulrich Schall;Philip B. Ward;Philip B. Ward

  • Sensory suppression effects to self-initiated sounds reflect the attenuation of the unspecific N1 component of the auditory ERP.

    Iria Sanmiguel;Juanita Todd;Erich Schröger

  • Effects of immune activation during early or late gestation on schizophrenia-related behaviour in adult rat offspring

    Crystal Meehan;Lauren Harms;Jade D. Frost;Rafael Barreto

  • Mismatch negativity (MMN) in freely-moving rats with several experimental controls.

    Lauren Harms;W. Ross Fulham;Juanita Todd;Timothy W. Budd

  • Epidural Auditory Event-Related Potentials in the Rat to Frequency and duration Deviants: Evidence of Mismatch Negativity?

    Tamo Nakamura;Patricia T. Michie;William R. Fulham;Juanita Todd

  • Association between reduced duration mismatch negativity (MMN) and raised temporal discrimination thresholds in schizophrenia.

    Juanita Todd;P.T Michie;A.V Jablensky

  • Impairment in activation of a frontal attention-switch mechanism in schizophrenic patients.

    Yasuharu Sato;Hirooki Yabe;Juanita Todd;Patricia Michie

  • Mismatch negativity (MMN) as biomarker predicting psychosis in clinically at-risk individuals

    Risto Näätänen;Juanita Todd;Ulrich Schall

  • Auditory sensory memory in schizophrenia: inadequate trace formation?

    Juanita Todd;Patricia T. Michie;T.William Budd;Danny Rock

  • Lasting first impressions: a conservative bias in automatic filters of the acoustic environment.

    Juanita Todd;Alexander Provost;Gavin Cooper

Frequent Co-Authors

Patricia T. Michie
Patricia T. Michie University of Newcastle Australia
Ulrich Schall
Ulrich Schall University of Newcastle Australia
Philip B. Ward
Philip B. Ward University of New South Wales
Nadia Solowij
Nadia Solowij University of Wollongong
Rodney J. Croft
Rodney J. Croft University of Wollongong
István Winkler
István Winkler Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Andrew Heathcote
Andrew Heathcote University of Newcastle Australia
Paul M. Thompson
Paul M. Thompson University of Southern California
Stuart J. Johnstone
Stuart J. Johnstone University of Wollongong
Assen Jablensky
Assen Jablensky University of Western Australia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens the door to a variety of online degrees and specialized careers. Many students pursue a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT) pathway, which is a rewarding field helping individuals, couples, and families navigate complex emotional issues.

Requirements to become a therapist differ by location. For example, if you want to learn how to become a marriage and family therapist in Tampa, you’ll need to complete a graduate-level degree and gain supervised clinical experience. Similarly, mft requirements in Toledo involve state-specific educational credentials and licensing exams.

Other cities have their own unique standards. You can read about how to become an mft in Tucson and how to become a marriage and family therapist in Tulsa to understand local requirements better. Online psychology degrees often include flexible course formats, helping students balance their studies with hands-on clinical experience—a critical step toward licensure and a successful career in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Juanita Todd

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles