World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 39 8435 7878 4510 4107 101 9057

Laura D. Hanish publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Laura D. Hanish between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Laura D. Hanish published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 3.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2017. 6 of the 107 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2017. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 1 publication 2010: 4 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 3 publications
1992 2025

107 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Laura D. Hanish: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 1
1994 0
1995 1
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 4
2001 2
2002 3
2003 3
2004 7
2005 3
2006 0
2007 5
2008 1
2009 1
2010 4
2011 3
2012 8
2013 6
2014 7
2015 3
2016 7
2017 9
2018 4
2019 3
2020 3
2021 3
2022 5
2023 4
2024 3
2025 3
Total 107
Download as CSV

Laura D. Hanish publications per year - data summary

  • Laura D. Hanish, a Psychology scholar from Arizona State University, has 107 publications recorded across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1992 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2017, with 9 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1992, 1993, 1995, 2008 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 6 of the 34 years in the span carry no publications at all (1994, 1996, 1997, 1998 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 3.1 papers per year over the whole span, or 3.8 per year counting only the 28 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 18 publications, 17% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1992-2003: 15 publications (1.3 per year); 2004-2015: 48 publications (4.0 per year); 2016-2025: 44 publications (4.4 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Laura D. Hanish publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laura D. Hanish sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 101 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 101
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Laura D. Hanish publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Laura D. Hanish, a Psychology scholar from Arizona State University, records 101 publications - the 21st percentile of the discipline.
  • 21% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Laura D. Hanish, and about 79% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Laura D. Hanish ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Laura D. Hanish D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laura D. Hanish sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 39
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Laura D. Hanish D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Laura D. Hanish, a Psychology scholar from Arizona State University, records 39 D-Index - the 27th percentile of the discipline.
  • 27% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Laura D. Hanish, and about 73% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Laura D. Hanish ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Laura D. Hanish is affiliated with Arizona State University in the United States and specializes in research within the social sciences and psychology. Their scholarly output includes a focus on education, social psychology, gender studies, clinical psychology, and safety research. The main fields of study encompass social sciences and psychology, with significant engagement in subfields such as education and gender studies.

The scientist's research addresses various topics including early childhood education and development, bullying, victimization, and aggression, gender roles and identity studies, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, parental involvement in education, social and intergroup psychology, and youth development and social support.

Recent publications demonstrate a focus on peer relationships and gender dynamics in childhood settings. Notable papers include:

  • Building integrated peer relationships in preschool classrooms: The potential of buddies (2021, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology)
  • Who Engages in Gender Bullying? The Role of Homophobic Name-Calling, Gender Pressure, and Gender Conformity (2020, Educational Researcher)
  • Preschoolers' interactions with other-gender peers promote prosocial behavior and reduce aggression: An examination of the Buddy Up intervention (2022, Early Childhood Research Quarterly)
  • Does gender-bending help or hinder friending? The roles of gender and gender similarity in friendship dissolution. (2020, Developmental Psychology)
  • The Benefits of Buddies: Strategically Pairing Preschoolers with Other-Gender Classmates Promotes Positive Peer Interactions (2022, Early Education and Development)

Frequent coauthors in Laura D. Hanish's work include Carol Lynn Martin, Dawn DeLay, Richard A. Fabes, Sonya Xinyue Xiao, and Krista Oswalt. These collaborations reflect a network of scholars investigating similar themes in developmental psychology and education.

Publication venues where work by Laura D. Hanish appears regularly include Frontiers in Developmental Psychology, Early Education and Development, British Journal of Developmental Psychology, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, and Educational Researcher. This range of journals indicates a strong presence in the literature related to developmental and educational psychology.

Best Publications

  • The relations of emotionality and regulation to preschoolers' social skills and sociometric status

    Nancy Eisenberg;Richard A. Fabes;Jane Bernzweig;Mariss Karbon

  • A longitudinal analysis of patterns of adjustment following peer victimization

    Laura D. Hanish;Nancy G. Guerra

  • Young Children's Play Qualities in Same-, Other-, and Mixed-Sex Peer Groups

    Richard A. Fabes;Carol Lynn Martin;Laura D. Hanish

  • The roles of ethnicity and school context in predicting children's victimization by peers.

    Laura D. Hanish;Nancy G. Guerra

  • The Pseudoscience of Single-Sex Schooling

    Diane F. Halpern;Lise Eliot;Rebecca S. Bigler;Richard A. Fabes

  • Aggressive Victims, Passive Victims, and Bullies: Developmental Continuity or Developmental Change?

    Laura D. Hanish;Nancy G. Guerra

  • A relational framework for understanding bullying: developmental antecedents and outcomes

    Philip C. Rodkin;Dorothy L. Espelage;Laura D. Hanish

  • Preschoolers’ academic readiness: What role does the teacher–child relationship play?

    Francisco Palermo;Laura D. Hanish;Carol Lynn Martin;Richard A. Fabes

  • The expression and regulation of negative emotions: risk factors for young children's peer victimization.

    Laura D. Hanish;Nancy Eisenberg;Richard A. Fabes;Tracy L. Spinrad

  • The Relation of Children's Everyday Nonsocial Peer Play Behavior to Their Emotionality, Regulation, and Social Functioning

    Tracy L. Spinrad;Nancy Eisenberg;Elizabeth Harris;Laura Hanish

  • Predictors of Peer Victimization among Urban Youth

    Laura D. Hanish;Nancy G. Guerra

  • The Role of Sex of Peers and Gender-Typed Activities in Young Children's Peer Affiliative Networks: A Longitudinal Analysis of Selection and Influence.

    Carol Lynn Martin;Olga Kornienko;David R. Schaefer;Laura D. Hanish

  • Children Who Get Victimized at School: What Is Known? What Can Be Done?.

    Laura D. Hanish;Nancy G. Guerra

  • Exposure to externalizing peers in early childhood: homophily and peer contagion processes.

    Laura D. Hanish;Carol Lynn Martin;Richard A. Fabes;Stacie Leonard

  • Children at play: the role of peers in understanding the effects of child care.

    Richard A. Fabes;Laura D. Hanish;Carol Lynn Martin

  • Early school competence: the roles of sex-segregated play and effortful control.

    Richard A. Fabes;Carol Lynn Martin;Laura D. Hanish;Mary C. Anders

  • Fundamental Principles of Network Formation among Preschool Children.

    David R. Schaefer;John M. Light;Richard A. Fabes;Laura D. Hanish

  • Bullying in North American Schools

    Dorothy L. Espelage;Susan M. Swearer

  • The role of normative beliefs in children's social behavior.

    Nancy G. Guerra;L. Rowell Huesmann;Laura Hanish

  • Preschoolers' Spontaneous Emotion Vocabulary: Relations to Likability.

    Richard A. Fabes;Nancy Eisenberg;Laura D. Hanish;Tracy L. Spinrad

Frequent Co-Authors

Carol Lynn Martin
Carol Lynn Martin Arizona State University
Richard A. Fabes
Richard A. Fabes Arizona State University
Kimberly A. Updegraff
Kimberly A. Updegraff Arizona State University
Nancy G. Guerra
Nancy G. Guerra University of California, Irvine
Nancy Eisenberg
Nancy Eisenberg Arizona State University
Tracy L. Spinrad
Tracy L. Spinrad Arizona State University
Antonius H. N. Cillessen
Antonius H. N. Cillessen Radboud University
Janet Shibley Hyde
Janet Shibley Hyde University of Wisconsin–Madison
Rebecca S. Bigler
Rebecca S. Bigler The University of Texas at Austin
Dorothy L. Espelage
Dorothy L. Espelage University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees can open doors to diverse career paths, particularly in social work. If you're interested in becoming a social worker, understanding state-specific requirements is essential. Each state sets its own educational standards and licensing criteria for social workers.

For example, the degree needed to be a social worker in Kansas is typically a Bachelor of Social Work (BSW), though higher roles may require a master’s degree. Similarly, you should be aware of the Kentucky minimum degree requirement for social workers, which also applies to those choosing between undergraduate and graduate education.

If you plan to work elsewhere, check local guidelines like the social worker degree requirements in Louisiana or the Maine minimum degree requirement for social workers. Online psychology and social work degrees are flexible options that help meet these requirements and prepare you for licensure exams, supervision hours, and specialized practice areas.

Best Scientists Citing Laura D. Hanish

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles