World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
101
Citations
71201
World Ranking
584
National Ranking
371

Janet Shibley Hyde publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janet Shibley Hyde sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 237 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Janet Shibley Hyde D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janet Shibley Hyde sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 101 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - James McKeen Cattell Fellow Award, Association for Psychological Science
  • 2008 - Fellow of the American Educational Research Association
  • 2004 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1985 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)
  • 1975 - Fellow of American Physical Society (APS)

Overview

Janet Shibley Hyde is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Social Sciences, with a focus on several subfields including Safety Research, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics mostly centered on Career Development and Diversity, Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, Mentoring and Academic Development, Educational Strategies and Epistemologies, Education, Achievement, and Giftedness. Additional topics include Stress Responses and Cortisol as well as Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum.

Among the recent papers authored or co-authored by Janet Shibley Hyde are the following:

  • Gender Differences in Depression: Biological, Affective, Cognitive, and Sociocultural Factors, 2020, Harvard Review of Psychiatry
  • College students' reasons for leaving biomedical fields: Disenchantment with biomedicine or attraction to other fields?, 2020, Journal of Educational Psychology
  • Utility-value intervention promotes persistence and diversity in STEM, 2023, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Inside the STEM pipeline: Changes in students' biomedical career plans across the college years, 2021, Science Advances
  • A prosocial value intervention in gateway STEM courses., 2023, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Hyde include:

  • Judith M. Harackiewicz
  • Michael W. Asher
  • Cameron A. Hecht
  • Stacy J. Priniski
  • Nicole M. Else-Quest

Publishing venues that frequently appear in Hyde's work comprise:

  • UNC Libraries
  • Harvard Review of Psychiatry
  • Journal of Educational Psychology
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Janet Shibley Hyde has been recognized with several awards and honors during their career, including:

  • James McKeen Cattell Fellow Award from the Association for Psychological Science in 2018
  • Fellow of the American Educational Research Association in 2008
  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2004
  • Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 1985
  • Fellow of American Physical Society (APS) in 1975

Best Publications

  • The gender similarities hypothesis.

    Janet Shibley Hyde

  • Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis.

    Janet Shibley Hyde;Elizabeth Fennema;Susan J. Lamon

  • The role of the media in body image concerns among women: A meta-analysis of experimental and correlational studies.

    Shelly Grabe;L. Monique Ward;Janet Shibley Hyde

  • The Objectified Body Consciousness Scale Development and Validation

    Nita Mary McKinley;Janet Shibley Hyde

  • Gender differences in depression in representative national samples: Meta-analyses of diagnoses and symptoms.

    Rachel H. Salk;Janet S. Hyde;Lyn Y. Abramson

  • Women, men, work, and family. An expansionist theory.

    Rosalind Chait Barnett;Janet Shibley Hyde

  • Gender differences in verbal ability: A meta-analysis.

    Janet Shibley Hyde;Marcia C. Linn

  • Gender differences in self-esteem: A meta-analysis.

    Kristen C. Kling;Janet Shibley Hyde;Carolin J. Showers;Brenda N. Buswell

  • Cross-National Patterns of Gender Differences in Mathematics: A Meta-Analysis.

    Nicole M. Else-Quest;Janet Shibley Hyde;Marcia C. Linn

  • Is There a Universal Positivity Bias in Attributions? A Meta-Analytic Review of Individual, Developmental, and Cultural Differences in the Self-Serving Attributional Bias.

    Amy H. Mezulis;Lyn Y. Abramson;Janet S. Hyde;Benjamin L. Hankin

  • Gender differences in sexuality: a meta-analysis.

    Mary Beth Oliver;Janet Shibley Hyde

  • Gender differences in temperament: a meta-analysis.

    Nicole M. Else-Quest;Janet Shibley Hyde;H. Hill Goldsmith;Carol A. Van Hulle

  • The Science of Sex Differences in Science and Mathematics

    Diane F. Halpern;Camilla P. Benbow;David C. Geary;Ruben C. Gur

  • Gender Similarities Characterize Math Performance

    Janet S. Hyde;Sara M. Lindberg;Marcia C. Linn;Amy B. Ellis

  • The ABCs of depression: integrating affective, biological, and cognitive models to explain the emergence of the gender difference in depression.

    Janet Shibley Hyde;Amy H. Mezulis;Lyn Y. Abramson

  • Gender Similarities and Differences

    Janet Shibley Hyde

  • New Trends in Gender and Mathematics Performance: A Meta-Analysis

    Sara M. Lindberg;Janet Shibley Hyde;Jennifer L. Petersen;Marcia C. Linn

  • A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993–2007.

    Jennifer L. Petersen;Janet Shibley Hyde

  • Gender differences in moral orientation: a meta-analysis.

    Sara Jaffee;Janet Shibley Hyde

  • How large are cognitive gender differences? A meta-analysis using !w² and d..

    Janet Shibley Hyde

  • Cross-National Patterns of Gender Differences in Mathematics:

    Nicole M. Else-Quest;Janet Shibley Hyde;Marcia C. Linn

Frequent Co-Authors

Judith M. Harackiewicz
Judith M. Harackiewicz University of Wisconsin–Madison
John DeLamater
John DeLamater University of Wisconsin–Madison
Marilyn J. Essex
Marilyn J. Essex University of Wisconsin–Madison
Sabra L. Katz-Wise
Sabra L. Katz-Wise Boston Children's Hospital
Marcia C. Linn
Marcia C. Linn University of California, Berkeley
Lyn Y. Abramson
Lyn Y. Abramson University of Wisconsin–Madison
Marjorie H. Klein
Marjorie H. Klein University of Wisconsin–Madison
Diane F. Halpern
Diane F. Halpern Claremont McKenna College
Patricia G. Devine
Patricia G. Devine University of Wisconsin–Madison
E. Ashby Plant
E. Ashby Plant Florida State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology opens doors to diverse and rewarding career options. Many students start by earning an undergraduate or graduate degree in psychology, often through flexible online programs. Specializations such as behavior analysis, counseling, or clinical psychology are popular options among those passionate about helping others.

Becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) is a sought-after pathway for those interested in applied behavior analysis. Each state and city may have its own steps and criteria for this career. For example, you can review the Stockton bcba requirements to understand local specifics in California, or see the process for becoming a bcba in Tampa if you plan to study or work in Florida.

Likewise, those considering Ohio can look into the Toledo bcba requirements, while aspiring professionals in Arizona should check the Tucson bcba requirements. Comparing these resources will help you choose the right online degree, meet certification requirements, and map out your ideal psychology career pathway.

Best Scientists Citing Janet Shibley Hyde

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles