World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Social Sciences and Humanities
USA
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 87 1069 938 661 566 287 38004

Marcia C. Linn publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marcia C. Linn between 1972 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marcia C. Linn published across 54 years, from 1972 to 2025, averaging 7.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2016. 14 of the 416 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2016. 1972: 1 publication 1973: 3 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 4 publications 1976: 8 publications 1977: 3 publications 1978: 7 publications 1979: 3 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 5 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 5 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 8 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 8 publications 1988: 8 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 8 publications 1992: 9 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 4 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 21 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 25 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 2 publications
1972 2025

416 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marcia C. Linn: publications per year, 1972 to 2025
Year Publications
1972 1
1973 3
1974 0
1975 4
1976 8
1977 3
1978 7
1979 3
1980 3
1981 5
1982 3
1983 5
1984 2
1985 8
1986 5
1987 8
1988 8
1989 5
1990 5
1991 8
1992 9
1993 4
1994 5
1995 7
1996 7
1997 4
1998 7
1999 6
2000 12
2001 1
2002 4
2003 6
2004 8
2005 4
2006 11
2007 5
2008 14
2009 7
2010 18
2011 21
2012 15
2013 17
2014 14
2015 15
2016 25
2017 10
2018 8
2019 12
2020 6
2021 11
2022 4
2023 11
2024 12
2025 2
Total 416
Download as CSV

Marcia C. Linn publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcia C. Linn sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 281–290 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 287 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139 287
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Marcia C. Linn D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcia C. Linn sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 86–87 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101 87
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in United States Leader Award
  • 2010 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)
  • 2008 - Fellow of the American Educational Research Association
  • 1994 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Marcia C. Linn is affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley, in the United States. Their scholarly work spans multiple intersecting fields including Social Sciences, Psychology, and Computer Science, with a total of 30 publications in social sciences, 23 in psychology, and 21 in computer science.

Their main subfields of study involve Education and Developmental and Educational Psychology, supported by 27 and 23 publications respectively. Additional research interests include Computer Science Applications, Artificial Intelligence, and Information Systems.

The scientist's work addresses various topics, particularly Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods and Science Education and Pedagogy, with 30 and 16 publications respectively. Other areas of focus include Educational Strategies and Epistemologies, Education and Critical Thinking Development, Online Learning and Analytics, Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning, and E-Learning and Knowledge Management.

Marcia C. Linn has contributed research papers to several prominent venues. Notable publication venues with multiple papers include:

  • Proceedings.
  • Journal of Science Education and Technology
  • Educational Research Review
  • British Journal of Educational Technology
  • Instructional Science

Recent papers demonstrate a focus on combining instructional approaches, computer-based learning support, and personalized instruction design:

  • "Let's talk evidence - The case for combining inquiry-based and direct instruction" (2023) published in Educational Research Review
  • "Computer-based guidance to support students' revision of their science explanations" (2021) published in Computers & Education
  • "Self-directed Science Learning During COVID-19 and Beyond" (2021) published in Journal of Science Education and Technology
  • "Designing personalised instruction: A research and design framework" (2021) published in British Journal of Educational Technology
  • "Supporting Teachers to Customize Curriculum for Self-Directed Learning" (2022) published in Journal of Science Education and Technology

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers. Their principal co-authors include Libby Gerard, Allison Bradford, Korah Wiley, Brian Riordan, and Jonathan Lim-Breitbart, denoting ongoing research partnerships across multiple projects.

Marcia C. Linn has been recognized by major professional associations. Awards received include Fellowships from the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2010, the American Educational Research Association in 2008, and the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1994.

Best Publications

  • Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: a meta-analysis.

    Marcia C. Linn;Anne C. Petersen

  • Gender differences in verbal ability: A meta-analysis.

    Janet Shibley Hyde;Marcia C. Linn

  • Cross-National Patterns of Gender Differences in Mathematics: A Meta-Analysis.

    Nicole M. Else-Quest;Janet Shibley Hyde;Marcia C. Linn

  • Gender Similarities Characterize Math Performance

    Janet S. Hyde;Sara M. Lindberg;Marcia C. Linn;Amy B. Ellis

  • New Trends in Gender and Mathematics Performance: A Meta-Analysis

    Sara M. Lindberg;Janet Shibley Hyde;Jennifer L. Petersen;Marcia C. Linn

  • Physical and Virtual Laboratories in Science and Engineering Education

    Ton de Jong;Marcia C. Linn;Zacharias C. Zacharia

  • Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: designing for learning from the web with KIE

    Philip Bell;Marcia C. Linn

  • Gender, Mathematics, and Science

    Marcia C. Linn;Janet S. Hyde

  • Undergraduate research experiences: Impacts and opportunities

    Marcia C. Linn;Erin Palmer;Anne Baranger;Elizabeth Gerard

  • Computers, Teachers, Peers: Science Learning Partners

    Marcia C. Linn;Sherry Hsi

  • How do students' views of science influence knowledge integration?

    Nancy Butler Songer;Marcia C. Linn

  • Motivating Children to Learn Effectively: Exploring the Value of Intrinsic Integration in Educational Games

    M. P. Jacob Habgood;Shaaron E. Ainsworth

  • Internet Environments for Science Education

    Marcia C. Linn;Elizabeth A. Davis;Philip Bell

  • Scaffolding students' knowledge integration: prompts for reflection in KIE

    Elizabeth A. Davis;Marcia C. Linn

  • Learning and Instruction: An Examination of Four Research Perspectives in Science Education

    Bat-Sheva Eylon;Marcia C. Linn

  • WISE design for knowledge integration

    Marcia C. Linn;Douglas Clark;James D. Slotta

  • Women's Representation in Science Predicts National Gender-Science Stereotypes: Evidence from 66 Nations.

    David I. Miller;Alice H. Eagly;Marcia C. Linn

  • The Psychology of gender : advances through meta-analysis

    Janet Shibley Hyde;Marcia C. Linn

  • Science Learning and Instruction: Taking Advantage of Technology to Promote Knowledge Integration

    Marcia C. Linn;Bat-Sheva Eylon

  • Gender Similarities in Mathematics and Science

    Janet Shibley Hyde;Marcia C. Linn

  • Designing the Knowledge Integration Environment

    Marcia C. Linn

  • Cross-National Patterns of Gender Differences in Mathematics:

    Nicole M. Else-Quest;Janet Shibley Hyde;Marcia C. Linn

Frequent Co-Authors

Ou Lydia Liu
Ou Lydia Liu Princeton University
Douglas B. Clark
Douglas B. Clark University of Calgary
Janet Shibley Hyde
Janet Shibley Hyde University of Wisconsin–Madison
Elizabeth A. Davis
Elizabeth A. Davis University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Roy D. Pea
Roy D. Pea Stanford University
Rafi Nachmias
Rafi Nachmias Tel Aviv University
Kevin L. Delucchi
Kevin L. Delucchi University of California, San Francisco
Frank Fischer
Frank Fischer Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Rita R. Colwell
Rita R. Colwell University of Maryland, College Park

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The demand for qualified professionals in Social Sciences and Humanities is growing across the USA. Online degrees offer a flexible and affordable way to start or advance your career in fields like counseling, psychology, therapy, and social work.

Many students pursue cacrep accredited counseling programs online to meet professional standards and licensing requirements. These programs provide comprehensive training for those seeking a career in mental health counseling.

If you are interested in supporting families and couples, consider exploring online mft programs accredited by recognized bodies. This pathway prepares you for rewarding roles in marriage and family therapy.

For broader opportunities in human behavior and research, online degrees in psychology offer foundational knowledge for careers in education, business, or clinical practice.

Those seeking to make a direct social impact may look for the easiest msw online program to begin a career in social work. These programs are designed for accessibility while ensuring strong professional preparation.

Best Scientists Citing Marcia C. Linn

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles