World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 51 5102 4733 2804 2538 106 20376

Lila R. Gleitman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lila R. Gleitman between 1961 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lila R. Gleitman published across 62 years, from 1961 to 2022, averaging 1.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2020. 9 of the 115 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1961 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2020. 1961: 1 publication 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 1 publication 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 1 publication 1970: 1 publication 1971: 2 publications 1972: 2 publications 1973: 3 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 2 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 4 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 4 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 2 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 2 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 0 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 4 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 6 publications
1961 2022

115 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lila R. Gleitman: publications per year, 1961 to 2022
Year Publications
1961 1
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 1
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 1
1970 1
1971 2
1972 2
1973 3
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 1
1978 2
1979 1
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 1
1984 4
1985 1
1986 1
1987 0
1988 2
1989 0
1990 2
1991 1
1992 2
1993 1
1994 2
1995 0
1996 1
1997 2
1998 0
1999 3
2000 3
2001 2
2002 7
2003 1
2004 4
2005 5
2006 3
2007 5
2008 1
2009 2
2010 1
2011 2
2012 4
2013 4
2014 1
2015 0
2016 3
2017 2
2018 1
2019 4
2020 13
2021 3
2022 6
Total 115
Download as CSV

Lila R. Gleitman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lila R. Gleitman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 106 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 106
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Lila R. Gleitman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lila R. Gleitman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445 51
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - David E. Rumelhart Prize for Contributions to the Theoretical Foundations of Human Cognition
  • 2003 - APA Award for Distinguished Scientific Contributions to Psychology, American Psychological Association
  • 2000 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 1999 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 1996 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Lila R. Gleitman is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and arts and humanities, with a focus on language and linguistics, developmental and educational psychology, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

The scientist's work covers multiple topics including syntax, semantics, linguistic variation, categorization, perception and language, language development and disorders, hearing impairment and communication, hand gesture recognition systems, language, discourse, communication strategies, and linguistics and terminology studies.

Significant recent publications include the following:

  • "Structural cues for symmetry, asymmetry, and non-symmetry in Central Taurus Sign Language" (2020), published in Sign Language & Linguistics
  • "Where word and world meet: Language and vision share an abstract representation of symmetry." (2022), published in Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • "Recollecting What We Once Knew: My Life in Psycholinguistics" (2021), published in Annual Review of Psychology
  • "The violin case" (2021), published in Cognition

Frequent collaborators include:

  • John C. Trueswell
  • Claire Gleitman
  • Anna Papafragou
  • Rabia Ergin
  • Ann Senghas

The scientist's work has been featured in several publication venues, reflecting the diverse nature of their research:

  • Sign Language & Linguistics
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • Annual Review of Psychology
  • Cognition

Lila R. Gleitman has received multiple distinctions, including the David E. Rumelhart Prize for Contributions to the Theoretical Foundations of Human Cognition in 2017, the APA Award for Distinguished Scientific Contributions to Psychology from the American Psychological Association in 2003, and elected memberships and fellowships such as Member of the National Academy of Sciences since 2000, Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences since 1999, and Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) since 1996.

Best Publications

  • The Structural Sources of Verb Meanings

    Lila R. Gleitman

  • Language Acquisition: The State of the Art

    Eric Wanner;Lila R. Gleitman

  • What some concepts might not be.

    Sharon Lee Armstrong;Lila R. Gleitman;Henry Gleitman

  • Turning the tables: language and spatial reasoning.

    Peggy Li;Lila Gleitman

  • Language and Experience: Evidence from the Blind Child

    Barbara Landau;Lila R. Gleitman

  • Human simulations of vocabulary learning.

    Jane Gillette;Henry Gleitman;Lila Gleitman;Anne Lederer

  • Mother, Id rather do it myself: Some effects and non-effects of maternal speech style

    E. Newport;Henry Gleitman;L. Gleitman

  • When it is better to receive than to give: Syntactic and conceptual constraints on vocabulary growth

    Cynthia Fisher;D.Geoffrey Hall;Susan Rakowitz;Lila Gleitman

  • Shake, rattle, ‘n’ roll: the representation of motion in language and cognition

    Anna Papafragou;Christine Massey;Lila Gleitman

  • On the semantic content of subcategorization frames.

    Cynthia Fisher;Henry Gleitman;Lila R Gleitman

  • Quality of early parent input predicts child vocabulary 3 years later

    Erica A Cartmill;Benjamin F Armstrong;Lila R Gleitman;Susan Goldin-Meadow

  • Propose but verify: fast mapping meets cross-situational word learning.

    John C. Trueswell;Tamara Nicol Medina;Alon Hafri;Lila R. Gleitman

  • The current status of the motherese hypothesis

    Lila R. Gleitman;Elissa L. Newport;Henry Gleitman

  • How words can and cannot be learned by observation

    Tamara Nicol Medina;Jesse Snedeker;John C. Trueswell;Lila R. Gleitman

  • On the give and take between event apprehension and utterance formulation.

    Lila R. Gleitman;David January;Rebecca Nappa;John C. Trueswell

  • Understanding how input matters: verb learning and the footprint of universal grammar.

    Jeffrey Lidz;Henry Gleitman;Lila Gleitman

  • Why It Is Hard to Label Our Concepts.

    J. Snedeker;L. Gleitman;Hall;Waxman

  • A Study in the Acquisition of Language: Free Responses to Commands

    Elizabeth F. Shipley;Carlota S. Smith;Lila R. Gleitman

  • Where learning begins: Initial representations for language learning.

    Lila R. Gleitman;Henry Gleitman;Barbara Landau;Eric Wanner

  • Hard Words

    Unknown

  • Similar, and similar concepts

    Lila R. Gleitman;Henry Gleitman;Carol Anne Miller;Ruth Ostrin

  • The Emergence of the Child as Grammarian

    Lila R. Gleitman;Henry Gleitman;Elizabeth F. Shipley

  • When English Proposes What Greek Presupposes: The Cross-Linguistic Encoding of Motion Events.

    Anna Papafragou;Christine Massey;Lila Gleitman

Frequent Co-Authors

John C. Trueswell
John C. Trueswell University of Pennsylvania
Anna Papafragou
Anna Papafragou University of Pennsylvania
Barbara Landau
Barbara Landau Johns Hopkins University
Elissa L. Newport
Elissa L. Newport Georgetown University
Jeffrey Lidz
Jeffrey Lidz University of Maryland, College Park
Susan Goldin-Meadow
Susan Goldin-Meadow University of Chicago
Jesse Snedeker
Jesse Snedeker Harvard University
Cynthia Fisher
Cynthia Fisher University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Paul Rozin
Paul Rozin University of Pennsylvania
Ray Jackendoff
Ray Jackendoff Tufts University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students considering a degree in Psychology, there are several related fields and affordable online options available in the USA. Social work stands out as a closely aligned career pathway, offering opportunities to make a real impact in communities while drawing from many core psychological principles.

Those seeking accessible pathways might explore the cheapest online social work programs in Ohio, which deliver flexible, budget-friendly degree options. Similarly, students in the South may benefit from the cheapest online social work degrees in Tennessee, known for their high value and comprehensive curricula.

Other regional options include affordable social work degrees in Arkansas, offering accessible entry points to the profession. Additionally, aspiring professionals in urban settings might consider the cheapest social work programs in Atlanta, providing robust career support and networking opportunities.

Exploring these related online degree programs prepares graduates for a range of roles in mental health, community outreach, and counseling, complementing a psychological background with practical, hands-on skills.

Best Scientists Citing Lila R. Gleitman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles