World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Claus-Christian Carbon

Claus-Christian Carbon

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
48
Citations
8112
World Ranking
5977
National Ranking
284

Claus-Christian Carbon publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claus-Christian Carbon sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 228 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Claus-Christian Carbon D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claus-Christian Carbon sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Claus-Christian Carbon is affiliated with the University of Bamberg in Germany. Their research spans across the fields of neuroscience and psychology, with a particular focus on cognitive neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, social psychology, sociology and political science, and clinical psychology.

Their scientific work addresses a range of topics, including:

  • Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
  • Face Recognition and Perception
  • Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Creativity in Education and Neuroscience

Carbon has contributed extensively to various academic journals, frequently publishing in:

  • i-Perception
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Journal of Vision
  • Attention Perception & Psychophysics

Recent papers from Carbon include:

  • "Wearing Face Masks Strongly Confuses Counterparts in Reading Emotions," 2020, Frontiers in Psychology
  • "The Impact of Face Masks on the Emotional Reading Abilities of Children-A Lesson From a Joint School-University Project," 2021, i-Perception
  • "About the Acceptance of Wearing Face Masks in Times of a Pandemic," 2021, i-Perception

Frequent collaborators in their research efforts are:

  • Niklas Alexander Döbler
  • Alexander Pastukhov
  • Sandra Utz
  • Fatemeh Khozaei
  • Ronja Mueller

Carbon's scholarly contributions primarily reside at the intersection of psychological and neuroscientific approaches, often exploring perception, emotional judgment, and social cognition. Their work on face masks and emotional perception is notable within the ongoing study of social communication under pandemic conditions.

Best Publications

  • Wearing Face Masks Strongly Confuses Counterparts in Reading Emotions

    Claus Christian Carbon

  • Entitling art: Influence of title information on understanding and appreciation of paintings.

    Helmut Leder;Claus-Christian Carbon;Ai-Leen Ripsas

  • The Aesthetic Aha: On the pleasure of having insights into Gestalt

    Claudia Muth;Claus-Christian Carbon

  • Dimensions in appreciation of car interior design

    Helmut Leder;Helmut Leder;Claus-Christian Carbon;Claus-Christian Carbon

  • Cognitive Fluency: High-Level Processing Dynamics in Art Appreciation

    Benno Belke;Helmut Leder;Tilo Strobach;Claus-Christian Carbon

  • Aesthetic appraisal of product designs: Independent effects of typicality and arousal

    Janneke Blijlevens;Claus-Christian Carbon;Ruth Mugge;Jan P. L. Schoormans

  • The Repeated Evaluation Technique (RET). A method to capture dynamic effects of innovativeness and attractiveness

    Claus-Christian Carbon;Claus-Christian Carbon;Helmut Leder

  • The cycle of preference: Long-term dynamics of aesthetic appreciation

    Claus-Christian Carbon

  • Face-specific configural processing of relational information.

    Helmut Leder;Claus-Christian Carbon;Claus-Christian Carbon

  • Neural and genetic foundations of face recognition and prosopagnosia

    Thomas Grüter;Martina Grüter;Claus-Christian Carbon

  • All is beautiful? Generality vs. specificity of word usage in visual aesthetics.

    M. Dorothee Augustin;Johan Wagemans;Claus-Christian Carbon

  • Understanding human perception by human-made illusions

    Claus-Christian Carbon

  • Consumer expectations for vegetables with typical and atypical colors: The case of carrots

    Hendrik N.J. Schifferstein;Theresa Wehrle;Claus-Christian Carbon

  • Style follows content: on the microgenesis of art perception.

    M. Dorothee Augustin;Helmut Leder;Florian Hutzler;Claus Christian Carbon

  • The Impact of Peer Mentoring on Mentee Academic Performance: Is Any Mentoring Style Better than No Mentoring at All?.

    Birgit Leidenfrost;Barbara Strassnig;Marlene Schütz;Philipps-University Marburg

  • The Appeal of Challenge in the Perception of Art: How Ambiguity, Solvability of Ambiguity, and the Opportunity for Insight Affect Appreciation

    Claudia Muth;Vera M. Hesslinger;Claus-Christian Carbon

  • Peer Mentoring Styles and Their Contribution to Academic Success Among Mentees: A Person-Oriented Study in Higher Education

    Birgit Leidenfrost;Barbara Strassnig;Alfred Schabmann;Christiane Spiel

  • Art perception in the museum: How we spend time and space in art exhibitions.

    Claus-Christian Carbon

  • When context hinders! Learn–test compatibility in face recognition

    Helmut Leder;Claus-Christian Carbon

  • Expert face processing: specialisation and constraints

    Adrian Schwaninger;Claus-Christian Carbon;Helmut Leder

  • Neural and genetic foundations of face recognition and prosopagnosia

    Claus-Christian Carbon;Martina Grueter;Thomas Grueter

Frequent Co-Authors

Helmut Leder
Helmut Leder University of Vienna
Zaira Cattaneo
Zaira Cattaneo University of Milano-Bicocca
Tomaso Vecchi
Tomaso Vecchi University of Pavia
Gabriel Curio
Gabriel Curio Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Jan P.L. Schoormans
Jan P.L. Schoormans Delft University of Technology
Juha Silvanto
Juha Silvanto University of Surrey
Karl Grammer
Karl Grammer University of Vienna
Bernhard Fink
Bernhard Fink University of Vienna
Todd K. Shackelford
Todd K. Shackelford Oakland University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The flexibility of online psychology programs has opened new doors for students across the country. Many colleges now offer accredited online degrees, allowing learners to balance studies with work and other commitments. If you're based in California, you might explore online psychology degrees in San Diego, which feature a range of specializations and delivery formats to fit your needs.

State-by-state differences can influence your educational experience. The best online psychology degree rankings in Texas highlight programs with a strong focus on counseling, clinical practice, and research, while tuition rates and prerequisites may also vary. Nationwide, the online psychology degrees in USA list is a valuable resource, offering guidance on choosing accredited programs and comparing features like program length and student support.

After earning your degree, a variety of career paths await—including school counseling, mental health services, human resources, and more. If you are considering specific regional options, take a look at the best online psychology degree programs ranking in Wisconsin for additional insights. No matter where you study, online pathways are making psychology more accessible—and more flexible—than ever before.

Best Scientists Citing Claus-Christian Carbon

Trending Scientists