World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 47 6234 5795 634 602 115 7672
Neuroscience 48 6233 5741 498 456 121 7810

Juha Silvanto publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Juha Silvanto between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Juha Silvanto published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 7.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2025. 27 of the 150 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2025. 2005: 3 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 4 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 2 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 20 publications
2005 2025

150 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Juha Silvanto: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 3
2006 1
2007 4
2008 12
2009 8
2010 14
2011 15
2012 6
2013 11
2014 10
2015 7
2016 5
2017 8
2018 5
2019 1
2020 2
2021 5
2022 4
2023 2
2024 7
2025 20
Total 150
Download as CSV

Juha Silvanto publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Juha Silvanto sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 118–127 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 121 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522 121
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Juha Silvanto D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Juha Silvanto sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435 48
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Juha Silvanto is a researcher affiliated with the University of Surrey in the United Kingdom specializing in neuroscience. Their work primarily focuses on cognitive neuroscience, with a total of 44 publications in the broader neuroscience field and 35 specifically in cognitive neuroscience. Additional subfields addressed in their research include neurology, experimental and cognitive psychology, psychiatry and mental health, as well as cellular and molecular neuroscience.

The scientist's main research topics encompass visual perception and processing mechanisms, neural dynamics and brain function, and face recognition and perception. Their studies also cover transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), neural and behavioral psychology, psychosomatic disorders and their treatments, and EEG and brain-computer interfaces.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with the researcher include Zaira Cattaneo, Timo L. Kvamme, Yoko Nagai, Kristian Sandberg, and Silvia Bona. The most common publication venues for their research are Neuropsychologia and bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), with additional appearances in Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Cortex, and The Neuroscientist.

Selected recent publications exemplify the scope and diversity of their work:

  • Only minimal differences between individuals with congenital aphantasia and those with typical imagery on neuropsychological tasks that involve imagery (2022, Cortex)
  • Noninvasive Brain Stimulation: Multiple Effects on Cognition (2022, The Neuroscientist)
  • Human perceptual and metacognitive decision-making rely on distinct brain networks (2022, PLoS Biology)
  • Nonlinear interaction between stimulation intensity and initial brain state: Evidence for the facilitatory/suppressive range model of online TMS effects (2020, Neuroscience Letters)
  • What makes a theory of consciousness unscientific? (2025, Nature Neuroscience)

Best Publications

  • State-dependency in brain stimulation studies of perception and cognition.

    Juha Silvanto;Juha Silvanto;Neil Muggleton;Vincent Walsh

  • State-Dependency of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

    Juha Silvanto;Alvaro Pascual-Leone

  • Neural adaptation reveals state-dependent effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation

    Juha Silvanto;Neil G. Muggleton;Alan Cowey;Vincent Walsh

  • Striate cortex (V1) activity gates awareness of motion

    Juha Silvanto;Alan Cowey;Nilli Lavie;Vincent Walsh

  • Double Dissociation of V1 and V5/MT activity in Visual Awareness

    Juha Silvanto;Nilli Lavie;Vincent Walsh

  • Working memory without consciousness

    David Soto;Teemu Mäntylä;Juha Silvanto

  • Information-Based Approaches of Noninvasive Transcranial Brain Stimulation.

    Vincenzo Romei;Gregor Thut;Juha Silvanto

  • Stimulation of the human frontal eye fields modulates sensitivity of extrastriate visual cortex.

    Juha Silvanto;Nilli Lavie;Vincent Walsh

  • Stochastic resonance effects reveal the neural mechanisms of transcranial magnetic stimulation

    Dietrich Samuel Schwarzkopf;Juha Silvanto;Geraint Rees

  • Reappraising the relationship between working memory and conscious awareness

    David Soto;Juha Silvanto

  • New light through old windows: moving beyond the "virtual lesion" approach to transcranial magnetic stimulation.

    Juha Silvanto;Juha Silvanto;Neil G. Muggleton

  • Visual working memory performance in aphantasia.

    Christianne Jacobs;Christianne Jacobs;Dietrich S. Schwarzkopf;Juha Silvanto

  • Baseline cortical excitability determines whether TMS disrupts or facilitates behavior.

    Juha Silvanto;Zaira Cattaneo;Lorella Battelli;Alvaro Pascual-Leone

  • Improved motion perception and impaired spatial suppression following disruption of cortical area MT/V5

    Duje Tadin;Juha Silvanto;Alvaro Pascual-Leone;Lorella Battelli

  • The Perceptual and Functional Consequences of Parietal Top-Down Modulation on the Visual Cortex

    Juha Silvanto;Neil Muggleton;Nilli Lavie;Vincent Walsh

  • The role of early visual cortex (V1/V2) in conscious and unconscious visual perception

    Mika Koivisto;Teemu Mäntylä;Juha Silvanto

  • Common framework for "virtual lesion" and state-dependent TMS: The facilitatory/suppressive range model of online TMS effects on behavior.

    Juha Silvanto;Zaira Cattaneo

  • Contrasting early visual cortical activation states causally involved in visual imagery and short-term memory.

    Zaira Cattaneo;Tomaso Vecchi;Alvaro Pascual-Leone;Juha Silvanto

  • The causal role of the lateral occipital complex in visual mirror symmetry detection and grouping: An fMRI-guided TMS study

    Silvia Bona;Silvia Bona;Andrew Herbert;Carlo Toneatto;Juha Silvanto;Juha Silvanto

  • Neural activation state determines behavioral susceptibility to modified theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation.

    Juha Silvanto;Neil G. Muggleton;Alan Cowey;Vincent Walsh

Frequent Co-Authors

Zaira Cattaneo
Zaira Cattaneo University of Milano-Bicocca
Tomaso Vecchi
Tomaso Vecchi University of Pavia
Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Alvaro Pascual-Leone Harvard University
Vincent Walsh
Vincent Walsh University College London
Geraint Rees
Geraint Rees University College London
Neil G. Muggleton
Neil G. Muggleton National Central University
Alan Cowey
Alan Cowey University of Oxford
David Soto
David Soto Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language
Nilli Lavie
Nilli Lavie University College London
Claus-Christian Carbon
Claus-Christian Carbon University of Bamberg

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Embarking on a neuroscience career can lead to diverse roles, and online education offers flexible options to begin or advance your journey. Many students are interested in online certifications that pay well, providing practical skills and qualifications that are highly valued across the healthcare and research sectors.

For those balancing work and study, enrolling in online college courses makes it easier to explore relevant subjects or earn a foundational degree. If you’re considering careers in mental health, social services, or behavior analysis, there are pathways to help you get certified and specialized with less financial strain.

Pursuing graduate credentials like the cheapest online MSW programs or targeted credentials such as BCBA certification online can open doors to high-demand roles in therapy, counseling, and behavioral analysis. Exploring affordable online degree options expands access to rewarding neuroscience-related careers without excessive debt.

Best Scientists Citing Juha Silvanto

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles