World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Stanislas Dehaene

Stanislas Dehaene

Award Badge
Best Scientists
2025
Award Badge
Neuroscience
France
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Best Scientists

D-Index
184
Citations
150038
World Ranking
522
National Ranking
9

Psychology

D-Index
182
Citations
144156
World Ranking
21
National Ranking
1

Neuroscience

D-Index
187
Citations
155475
World Ranking
47
National Ranking
1

Stanislas Dehaene publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stanislas Dehaene sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 550 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Stanislas Dehaene D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stanislas Dehaene sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 182 D-Index — 100th percentile

100% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Neuroscience in France Leader Award
  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in France Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Best Scientists Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Neuroscience in France Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Psychology in France Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Neuroscience in France Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Psychology in France Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Neuroscience in France Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Psychology in France Leader Award
  • 2020 - David E. Rumelhart Prize for Contributions to the Theoretical Foundations of Human Cognition
  • 2015 - APA Award for Distinguished Scientific Contributions to Psychology, American Psychological Association
  • 2014 - The Brain Prize, Lundbeck Foundation For their pioneering research on higher brain mechanisms underpinning such complex human functions as literacy, numeracy, motivated behaviour and social cognition, and for their efforts to understand cognitive and behavioural disorders
  • 2014 - Mind & Brain Prize, University and Polytechnic of Turin
  • 2013 - Grand prix de l'Inserm - Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale
  • 2010 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 2009 - Member of Academia Europaea
  • 2003 - Grand Prix scientifique de la Fondation Louis D., Institut de France
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)

Overview

Stanislas Dehaene is affiliated with Collège de France in France. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience and psychology, with a strong emphasis on cognitive neuroscience and developmental and educational psychology. They have also contributed to fields such as statistics and probability, artificial intelligence, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

Their work covers several main topics including reading and literacy development, neural dynamics and brain function, cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills, visual perception and processing mechanisms, neurobiology of language and bilingualism, functional brain connectivity studies, and EEG and brain-computer interfaces.

Frequent co-authors include Yair Lakretz, Béchir Jarraya, Timo van Kerkoerle, Cassandra Potier Watkins, and Aakash Agrawal.

Common venues for their publications are:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • Cognition
  • eLife
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Recent papers by Stanislas Dehaene include:

  • Conscious Processing and the Global Neuronal Workspace Hypothesis, 2020, Neuron
  • Geometry of sequence working memory in macaque prefrontal cortex, 2022, Science
  • Symbols and mental programs: a hypothesis about human singularity, 2022, Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • Deep brain stimulation of the thalamus restores signatures of consciousness in a nonhuman primate model, 2022, Science Advances
  • Spatiotemporal dynamics of orthographic and lexical processing in the ventral visual pathway, 2020, Nature Human Behaviour

Dehaene has published books with the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique and Éditions Odile Jacob. Titles include How We Learn: Why Brains Learn Better Than Any Machine... for Now (2020) and École éclairée par la science (2021).

Their awards comprise the David E. Rumelhart Prize for Contributions to the Theoretical Foundations of Human Cognition (2020), the APA Award for Distinguished Scientific Contributions to Psychology from the American Psychological Association (2015), the Mind & Brain Prize from the University and Polytechnic of Turin (2014), and The Brain Prize from the Lundbeck Foundation (2014) for research on higher brain mechanisms underpinning complex human functions such as literacy, numeracy, motivated behavior, and social cognition.

Additional recognitions include the Grand prix de l'Inserm - Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (2013), membership in the National Academy of Sciences (2010), Academia Europaea (2009), and the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO).

Best Publications

  • The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics

    Stanislas Dehaene

  • The mental representation of parity and number magnitude.

    Stanislas Dehaene;Serge Bossini;Pascal Giraux

  • Core systems of number

    Lisa Feigenson;Stanislas Dehaene;Elizabeth Spelke

  • THREE PARIETAL CIRCUITS FOR NUMBER PROCESSING

    Stanislas Dehaene;Manuela Piazza;Philippe Pinel;Laurent Cohen

  • Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: basic evidence and a workspace framework.

    Stanislas Dehaene;Lionel Naccache

  • Varieties of numerical abilities.

    Stanislas Dehaene

  • Experimental and Theoretical Approaches to Conscious Processing

    Stanislas Dehaene;Jean-Pierre Changeux;Jean-Pierre Changeux

  • Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: a testable taxonomy.

    Stanislas Dehaene;Jean Pierre Changeux;Jean Pierre Changeux;Lionel Naccache;Jérôme Sackur

  • Sources of Mathematical Thinking: Behavioral and Brain-Imaging Evidence

    S. Dehaene;E. S Spelke;P. Pinel;R. Stanescu

  • The visual word form area: spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients.

    Laurent Cohen;Stanislas Dehaene;Lionel Naccache;Stéphane Lehéricy

  • The visual word form area: expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus

    Bruce D. McCandliss;Laurent Cohen;Stanislas Dehaene

  • A Neuronal Model of a Global Workspace in Effortful Cognitive Tasks

    Stanislas Dehaene;Michel Kerszberg;Jean-Pierre Changeux

  • Cultural Recycling of Cortical Maps

    Stanislas Dehaene;Laurent Cohen

  • The unique role of the visual word form area in reading

    Stanislas Dehaene;Laurent Cohen;Laurent Cohen

  • Localization of a Neural System for Error Detection and Compensation

    Stanislas Dehaene;Michael I Posner;Don M Tucker

  • Exact and Approximate Arithmetic in an Amazonian Indigene Group

    Pierre Pica;Cathy Lemer;Véronique Izard;Stanislas Dehaene

  • Cerebral mechanisms of word masking and unconscious repetition priming.

    Stanislas Dehaene;Lionel Naccache;Laurent Cohen;Denis Le Bihan

  • Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex.

    Edward M. Hubbard;Manuela Piazza;Philippe Pinel;Stanislas Dehaene

  • Language‐specific tuning of visual cortex? Functional properties of the Visual Word Form Area

    Laurent Cohen;Stéphane Lehéricy;Florence Chochon;Cathy Lemer

  • Imaging unconscious semantic priming

    Stanislas Dehaene;Lionel Naccache;Gurvan Le Clec'H;Etienne Koechlin

  • The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics.

    Reuben Hersh;Stanislas Dehaene

Frequent Co-Authors

Lionel Naccache
Lionel Naccache Sorbonne University
Laurent D. Cohen
Laurent D. Cohen Paris Dauphine University
Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz
Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Jean-Rémi King
Jean-Rémi King École Normale Supérieure
Mariano Sigman
Mariano Sigman Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
Jean-Pierre Changeux
Jean-Pierre Changeux Institut Pasteur
Manuela Piazza
Manuela Piazza University of Trento
Antoinette Jobert
Antoinette Jobert Grenoble Alpes University
Christophe Pallier
Christophe Pallier Grenoble Alpes University
Elizabeth S. Spelke
Elizabeth S. Spelke Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens diverse and rewarding career opportunities. An increasingly popular pathway for graduates is social work, which allows professionals to have a positive impact in their communities. There are specialized routes and requirements for entering this field depending on your state of residence.

For those interested in becoming a social worker in South Carolina, or exploring how to become a social worker in South Dakota, understanding the licensing processes and educational prerequisites is key. Similarly, there are distinct steps for becoming a social worker in Tennessee, as well as those curious about how to become a social worker in Texas.

Many universities offer flexible online psychology and social work degrees, making it easier to balance studies and personal commitments. Whatever your career goals, understanding the local regulations and accreditation requirements will set a strong foundation for a successful transition into these helping professions.

Best Scientists Citing Stanislas Dehaene

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles