World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
71
Citations
18392
World Ranking
2174
National Ranking
1269

Elizabeth M. Brannon publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth M. Brannon sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 149 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Elizabeth M. Brannon D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth M. Brannon sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Elizabeth M. Brannon is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills, with a particular emphasis on mathematics education and teaching techniques.

The main fields of study in which they have published include:

  • Mathematics
  • Social Sciences

Within these fields, their subfields of study include:

  • Statistics and Probability
  • Education
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Applied Mathematics

Their work covers a range of topics such as:

  • Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function

Elizabeth M. Brannon has published multiple recent papers, including:

  • "Number sense biases children's area judgments" (2020) in Cognition
  • "Failure to replicate the benefit of approximate arithmetic training for symbolic arithmetic fluency in adults" (2020) in Cognition
  • "Similarly oriented objects appear more numerous" (2020) in Journal of Vision
  • "Approximate arithmetic training does not improve symbolic math in third and fourth grade children" (2021) in Trends in Neuroscience and Education
  • "First and Second Graders Successfully Reason About Ratios With Both Dot Arrays and Arabic Numerals" (2021) in Child Development

Their frequent publication venues include:

  • Cognition
  • Journal of Vision
  • Trends in Neuroscience and Education
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • Harvard Dataverse

They have collaborated frequently with several co-authors in their research, including:

  • Chuyan Qu
  • Sami R. Yousif
  • Sam Clarke
  • Nicholas K. DeWind
  • Emily Szkudlarek

Best Publications

  • Functional Imaging of Numerical Processing in Adults and 4-y-Old Children

    Jessica F Cantlon;Elizabeth M Brannon;Elizabeth J Carter;Kevin A Pelphrey

  • Ordering of the Numerosities 1 to 9 by Monkeys

    Elizabeth M. Brannon;Herbert S. Terrace

  • The evolution of self-control

    Evan L. MacLean;Brian Hare;Charles L. Nunn;Elsa Addessi

  • Shared system for ordering small and large numbers in monkeys and humans.

    Jessica F. Cantlon;Elizabeth M. Brannon

  • Beyond the Number Domain

    Jessica F. Cantlon;Michael L. Platt;Elizabeth M. Brannon

  • Training the Approximate Number System Improves Math Proficiency

    Joonkoo Park;Elizabeth M. Brannon

  • Number sense in infancy predicts mathematical abilities in childhood

    Ariel Starr;Melissa E. Libertus;Melissa E. Libertus;Elizabeth M. Brannon

  • Re-visiting the competence/performance debate in the acquisition of the counting principles

    Mathieu Le Corre;Gretchen Van de Walle;Elizabeth M. Brannon;Susan Carey

  • The development of ordinal numerical knowledge in infancy

    Elizabeth M Brannon

  • Electrophysiological evidence for notation independence in numerical processing

    Melissa E Libertus;Marty G Woldorff;Elizabeth M Brannon

  • Representation of the numerosities 1–9 by rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).

    Elizabeth M. Brannon;Herbert S. Terrace

  • Monotonic Coding of Numerosity in Macaque Lateral Intraparietal Area

    Jamie D Roitman;Elizabeth M Brannon;Michael L Platt

  • The representation of numerical magnitude.

    Elizabeth M Brannon

  • The neural development of an abstract concept of number

    Jessica F. Cantlon;Melissa E. Libertus;Philippe Pinel;Stanislas Dehaene

  • How does cognition evolve? Phylogenetic comparative psychology

    Evan L. MacLean;Luke J. Matthews;Brian A. Hare;Charles L. Nunn

  • Number bias for the discrimination of large visual sets in infancy

    Elizabeth M Brannon;Sara Abbott;Donna J Lutz

  • Basic Math in Monkeys and College Students

    Jessica F Cantlon;Elizabeth M Brannon

  • Numerical Subtraction in the Pigeon: Evidence for a Linear Subjective Number Scale

    Elizabeth M. Brannon;Courtney J. Wusthoff;C.R. Gallistel;John Gibbon

  • Malleability of the approximate number system: effects of feedback and training.

    Nicholas Kurshan DeWind;Elizabeth M Brannon

  • Stable individual differences in number discrimination in infancy

    Melissa E. Libertus;Elizabeth M. Brannon

  • The multisensory representation of number in infancy.

    Kerry E. Jordan;Elizabeth M. Brannon

Frequent Co-Authors

Jessica F. Cantlon
Jessica F. Cantlon Carnegie Mellon University
Michael L. Platt
Michael L. Platt University of Pennsylvania
Melissa E. Libertus
Melissa E. Libertus University of Pittsburgh
Marty G. Woldorff
Marty G. Woldorff Duke University
Kevin A. Pelphrey
Kevin A. Pelphrey University of Virginia
Scott A. Huettel
Scott A. Huettel Duke University
Herbert S. Terrace
Herbert S. Terrace Columbia University
Stanislas Dehaene
Stanislas Dehaene Collège de France
Daniel Casasanto
Daniel Casasanto Cornell University
Warren H. Meck
Warren H. Meck Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens a wide range of career opportunities in the mental health field. Many students pursue online bachelor’s or master’s programs as a flexible route to careers such as counseling, social work, or therapy. Earning an advanced degree is often a requirement for licensure and professional practice in the United States.

To become a licensed therapist, students must complete state-specific education and supervised clinical experience. Each state has its own requirements—for example, the process of becoming a licensed therapist in St. Petersburg can differ from licensed therapist requirements in Stockton or Tampa licensed therapist education requirements. Similarly, you’ll find a unique process for becoming a licensed therapist in Toledo.

Before enrolling, research your state’s licensing qualifications and ensure that your online degree is properly accredited. Doing so will help you meet career goals and tap into a growing job market for mental health professionals across the U.S.

Best Scientists Citing Elizabeth M. Brannon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles