World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
42
Citations
6985
World Ranking
7657
National Ranking
57

Haim Sohmer publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Haim Sohmer sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 240 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Haim Sohmer D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Haim Sohmer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Haim Sohmer is affiliated with the Hebrew University of Jerusalem in Israel and has contributed to research primarily within the fields of medicine and neuroscience. Their work focuses extensively on otorhinolaryngology and sensory systems, with additional interests in cognitive neuroscience, genetics, and developmental and educational psychology.

The main research topics covered in Sohmer's publications include:

  • Ear Surgery and Otitis Media
  • Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
  • Hearing Impairment and Communication
  • Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Noise Effects and Management

Frequently published venues for Sohmer's work include:

  • Audiology Research
  • Otology & Neurotology
  • Cochlear Implants International
  • Journal of Audiology & Otology

Significant recent papers authored or co-authored by Sohmer illustrate a focus on auditory stimulation and cochlear mechanics. These include:

  • "Occlusion Effect in Response to Stimulation by Soft Tissue Conduction-Implications" (2020, Audiology Research)
  • "The Effect of Soft Tissue Stimulation on Skull Vibrations and Hearing Thresholds in Humans" (2021, Otology & Neurotology)
  • "How Is the Cochlea Activated in Response to Soft Tissue Auditory Stimulation in the Occluded Ear?" (2021, Audiology Research)
  • "Implications from cochlear implant insertion for cochlear mechanics" (2020, Cochlear Implants International)
  • "Audiogram in Response to Stimulation Delivered to Fluid Applied to the External Meatus" (2020, Journal of Audiology & Otology)

Sohmer has collaborated repeatedly with several researchers, including:

  • Miriam Geal-Dor
  • Cahtia Adelman
  • Shai Chordekar
  • Ronen Perez
  • Michal Kaufmann-Yehezkely

This profile reflects Sohmer's contributions to understanding auditory processes, cochlear function, and clinical implications for hearing and ear surgery through a multidisciplinary approach integrating aspects of genetic influence and sensory system analysis.

Best Publications

  • Sources of averaged neural responses recorded in animal and human subjects during cochlear audiometry (Electro-Cochleogram)

    A. Lev;H. Sohmer

  • Development of hearing in neonatal rats: Air and bone conducted ABR thresholds

    M. Geal-Dor;S. Freeman;G. Li;H. Sohmer

  • Bone conduction experiments in humans - a fluid pathway from bone to ear.

    Haim Sohmer;Sharon Freeman;Miriam Geal-Dor;Cahtia Adelman

  • Sources of electrocochleographic responses as studied in patients with brain damage

    H Sohmer;M Feinmesser;G Szabo

  • Intensity and rate functions of cochlear and brainstem evoked responses to click stimuli in man.

    H Pratt;H Sohmer

  • Sources of frequency following responses (FFR) in man.

    H Sohmer;H Pratt;R Kinarti

  • Bone conduction experiments in animals - evidence for a non-osseous mechanism.

    Sharon Freeman;Jean-Yves Sichel;Haim Sohmer

  • Somatosensory function in boys with ADHD and tactile defensiveness.

    S. Parush;H. Sohmer;A. Steinberg;M. Kaitz

  • Somatosensory functioning in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

    Shula Parush;Haim Sohmer;Avraham Steinberg;Marsha Kaitz

  • The depression of the auditory nerve-brain-stem evoked response in hypoxaemia--mechanism and site of effect.

    H Sohmer;S Freeman;M Gafni;K Goitein

  • Auditory nerve and brain-stem evoked responses in normal, autistic, minimal brain dysfunction and psychomotor retarded children

    H Sohmer;H Sohmer;M Student;M Student

  • A functional measure of brain activity: Brain stem transmission time

    M Fabiani;H Sohmer;C Tait;M Gafni

  • Routine Use Of Electrocochleography (Cochlear Audiometry On Human Subjects

    H. Sohmer;M. Feinmesser

  • Further evidence for a fluid pathway during bone conduction auditory stimulation.

    Haim Sohmer;Sharon Freeman

  • The pathway enabling external sounds to reach and excite the fetal inner ear.

    Haim Sohmer;Ronen Perez;Jean-Yves Sichel;Ronit Priner

  • Psychological Profile of Help-seeking and Non-help-seeking Tinnitus Patients

    Joseph Attias;Zecharya Shemesh;Avi Bleich;Zehava Solomon

  • Evidence from auditory nerve and brainstem evoked responses for an organic brain lesion in children with autistic traits

    Unknown

  • Method for analysis of ongoing and evoked neuro-electrical activity

    Haim Sohmer;Vladimir Rodionov;Craig Goodman

  • Recording of short latency vestibular evoked potentials to acceleration in rats by means of skin electrodes

    J Elidan;H Sohmer;M Nizan

  • Comparison between Self-Hypnosis, Masking and Attentiveness for Alleviation of Chronic Tinnitus

    Joseph Attias;Zecharya Shemesh;Haim Sohmer;Shlomit Gold

  • Multi-modality evoked potentials in hypoxaemia.

    H Sohmer;S Freeman;S Malachi

Frequent Co-Authors

Merav Ahissar
Merav Ahissar Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Sandra L. McFadden
Sandra L. McFadden University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Bryan E. Pfingst
Bryan E. Pfingst University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Richard Salvi
Richard Salvi University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Li Xu
Li Xu Tsinghua University
Daniela Salvemini
Daniela Salvemini Saint Louis University
Jochen Schacht
Jochen Schacht University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Haim Sohmer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles