World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
36
Citations
4773
World Ranking
9042
National Ranking
3819

Sandra L. McFadden publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sandra L. McFadden sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 80 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Sandra L. McFadden D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sandra L. McFadden sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sandra L. McFadden is affiliated with the University at Buffalo, State University of New York in the United States. Their academic career centers around research conducted within this institution.

Details on their recent papers, frequent co-authors, specific publication venues, book publications, main and subfields of study, and main research topics are not recorded in the available data.

There is also no information regarding awards or recognitions received by Sandra L. McFadden.

The scientist is currently living.

Best Publications

  • Targeted deletion of the cytosolic Cu/Zn-superoxide dismutase gene (Sod1) increases susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss.

    Kevin K. Ohlemiller;Sandra L. McFadden;Da-Lian Ding;Dorothy G. Flood

  • Targeted mutation of the gene for cellular glutathione peroxidase (Gpx1) increases noise-induced hearing loss in mice.

    Kevin K. Ohlemiller;Sandra L. McFadden;Da-Lian Ding;Patricia M. Lear

  • Plasticity of auditory cortex associated with sensorineural hearing loss in adult C57BL/6J mice

    James F. Willott;Lindsay M. Aitkin;Sandra L. McFadden

  • Age-related cochlear hair cell loss is enhanced in mice lacking copper/zinc superoxide dismutase

    Sandra L McFadden;Dalian Ding;Andrew G Reaume;Dorothy G Flood

  • The role of antioxidants in protection from impulse noise.

    D. Henderson;S. L. Mcfadden;C. C. Liu;N. Hight

  • R-phenylisopropyladenosine attenuates noise-induced hearing loss in the chinchilla.

    Bo Hua Hu;Xiang Yang Zheng;Sandra L. McFadden;Richard D. Kopke

  • Gamma-aminobutyric acid circuits shape response properties of auditory cortex neurons.

    Jian Wang;Sandra L McFadden;Donald Caspary;Richard Salvi

  • Dietary vitamin C supplementation reduces noise-induced hearing loss in guinea pigs

    Sandra L. McFadden;Jenifer M. Woo;Nathan Michalak;Dalian Ding

  • Cu/Zn SOD deficiency potentiates hearing loss and cochlear pathology in aged 129,CD-1 mice.

    Sandra L. McFadden;Sandra L. McFadden;Dalian Ding;Robert F. Burkard;Haiyan Jiang

  • Long-Term Effects of Sectioning the Olivocochlear Bundle in Neonatal Cats

    Edward J. Walsh;JoAnn McGee;Sandra L. McFadden;M. Charles Liberman

  • Noise-induced hearing loss in chinchillas pre-treated with glutathione monoethylester and R-PIA.

    Nancy G Hight;Sandra L McFadden;Donald Henderson;Robert F Burkard

  • Time course of efferent fiber and spiral ganglion cell degeneration following complete hair cell loss in the chinchilla

    Sandra L. McFadden;Dalian Ding;Haiyan Jiang;Richard J. Salvi

  • Selective Loss of Inner Hair Cells and Type-I Ganglion Neurons in Carboplatin-Treated Chinchillas: Mechanisms of Damage and Protection

    D.-L. Ding;J. Wang;R. Salvi;D. Henderson

  • The role of the cochlear efferent system in acquired resistance to noise-induced hearing loss.

    Xiang-Yang Zheng;Donald Henderson;Sandra L. McFadden;Bo-Hua Hu

  • The influence of the cochlear efferent system on chronic acoustic trauma.

    Xiang-Yang Zheng;Donald Henderson;Bo-Hua Hu;Da-Lian Ding

  • Anatomical, Metabolic and Genetic Aspects of Age-related Hearing Loss in Mice: Aspectos anatómicos, metabólicos y genéticos de la hipoacusia relacionada con la edad en ratones

    Sandra L. McFadden;Dalian Ding;Richard Salvi

  • Cochlear Hair Cell Densities and Inner-Ear Staining Techniques

    Dalian Ding;Sandra L. McFadden;Richard J. Salvi

  • Evidence that inner hair cells are the major source of cochlear summating potentials

    Xiang-Yang Zheng;Da-Lian Ding;Sandra L. McFadden;Donald Henderson

  • Anatomical, metabolic and genetic aspects of age-related hearing loss in mice.

    S L McFadden;D Ding;R Salvi

  • Morphology of the dorsal cochlear nucleus in C57BL/6J and CBA/J mice across the life span.

    James F. Willott;Lori Seegers Bross;Sandra L. McFadden

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard Salvi
Richard Salvi University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Donald Henderson
Donald Henderson University at Buffalo, State University of New York
James F. Willott
James F. Willott University of South Florida
Jian Wang
Jian Wang Dalhousie University
Daniela Salvemini
Daniela Salvemini Saint Louis University
Kevin K. Ohlemiller
Kevin K. Ohlemiller Washington University in St. Louis
Haim Sohmer
Haim Sohmer Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Donald M. Caspary
Donald M. Caspary Southern Illinois University School of Medicine
Bryan E. Pfingst
Bryan E. Pfingst University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Merav Ahissar
Merav Ahissar Hebrew University of Jerusalem

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience opens doors to a wide range of online degree options and flexible learning pathways. Many students are motivated by the potential for high earnings, and there are interesting majors that pay well within the broader health and science fields, including neuroscience and related subjects.

For learners seeking affordable education, there are numerous cheapest online colleges that accept fafsa in usa, enabling eligible students to pursue their studies with financial support.

Beyond traditional degrees, some students may want to fast-track their careers through certificate programs that pay well. These programs can provide specialized skills for roles in data analysis, research, or allied health, often with a flexible schedule.

If you're a working professional or returning learner, there are also online classes for adults designed to fit around your busy life. Exploring these options can help you build a fulfilling and lucrative career in neuroscience or related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Sandra L. McFadden

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles