World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
37
Citations
4243
World Ranking
8874
National Ranking
3754

Guang-Di Chen publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guang-Di Chen sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 96 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Guang-Di Chen D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guang-Di Chen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Guang-Di Chen is affiliated with the University at Buffalo, State University of New York in the United States. Their research is primarily situated within the field of Neuroscience, with a significant focus on sensory systems and cognitive neuroscience.

The scientist's work extensively covers topics related to hearing and auditory function. Key research interests include hearing, cochlea, tinnitus, and genetics, as well as hearing loss and rehabilitation. Additional areas of study involve vestibular and auditory disorders, noise effects and management, neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms, neuroscience and music perception, and Williams syndrome research.

Frequent publication venues for Guang-Di Chen include:

  • Hearing Research
  • American Journal of Audiology
  • Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
  • Neurotoxicity Research
  • Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology

Some recent papers authored or co-authored by Guang-Di Chen are:

  • Review: Neural Mechanisms of Tinnitus and Hyperacusis in Acute Drug-Induced Ototoxicity, 2021, American Journal of Audiology
  • 2-Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin Ototoxicity in Adult Rats: Rapid Onset and Massive Destruction of Both Inner and Outer Hair Cells Above a Critical Dose, 2020, Neurotoxicity Research
  • Hyperacusis: Loudness intolerance, fear, annoyance and pain, 2022, Hearing Research
  • Unexpected Consequences of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss: Impaired Hippocampal Neurogenesis, Memory, and Stress, 2022, Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
  • Blast-induced hearing loss suppresses hippocampal neurogenesis and disrupts long term spatial memory, 2020, Hearing Research

Guang-Di Chen collaborates frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Richard Salvi
  • Senthilvelan Manohar
  • Xiaopeng Liu
  • Dalian Ding
  • Li Li

Best Publications

  • Salicylate-induced abnormal activity in the inferior colliculus of rats.

    Guang-di Chen;Pawel J. Jastreboff

  • The relationship between noise-induced hearing loss and hair cell loss in rats.

    Guang-Di Chen;Laurence D Fechter

  • Tinnitus and hyperacusis involve hyperactivity and enhanced connectivity in auditory-limbic-arousal-cerebellar network

    Yu-Chen Chen;Xiaowei Li;Lijie Liu;Jian Wang;Jian Wang

  • Inner Hair Cell Loss Disrupts Hearing and Cochlear Function Leading to Sensory Deprivation and Enhanced Central Auditory Gain.

    Richard Salvi;Wei Sun;Dalian Ding;Guang Di Chen

  • Age-related hearing loss: is it a preventable condition?

    Eric C. Bielefeld;Chiemi Tanaka;Guang-di Chen;Donald Henderson

  • Effects of stimulus duration on responses of neurons in the chinchilla inferior colliculus.

    Guang-Di Chen

  • Salicylate-induced peripheral auditory changes and tonotopic reorganization of auditory cortex.

    Daniel Stolzberg;Guang-Di Chen;Brian L. Allman;Richard J. Salvi

  • Salicylate-induced cochlear impairments, cortical hyperactivity and re-tuning, and tinnitus

    Guang-Di Chen;Daniel Stolzberg;Edward Lobarinas;Wei Sun

  • Review of salicylate-induced hearing loss, neurotoxicity, tinnitus and neuropathophysiology.

    A M Sheppard;S.H. Hayes;G D Chen;M. Ralli

  • Too much of a good thing: Long-term treatment with salicylate strengthens outer hair cell function but impairs auditory neural activity

    Guang-Di Chen;Mohammad Habiby Kermany;Alessandra D’Elia;Massimo Ralli;Massimo Ralli

  • Potentiation of octave-band noise induced auditory impairment by carbon monoxide.

    Guang-Di Chen;Laurence D Fechter

  • Aging outer hair cells (OHCs) in the Fischer 344 rat cochlea: function and morphology.

    Guang-Di Chen;Manna Li;Chiemi Tanaka;Eric C. Bielefeld

  • Predicting exposure conditions that facilitate the potentiation of noise-induced hearing loss by carbon monoxide.

    Laurence D. Fechter;Guang-Di Chen;Deepa Rao;Jason Larabee

  • Anti-muscarinic adjunct therapy accelerates functional human oligodendrocyte repair.

    Kavitha Abiraman;Suyog U. Pol;Melanie A. O'Bara;Guang-Di Chen

  • Prestin gene expression in the rat cochlea following intense noise exposure

    Guang-Di Chen

  • Chemical Asphyxiants and Noise.

    Laurence D. Fechter;Guang-Di Chen;Deepa Rao

  • Cocaine Up-Regulates Fra-2 and σ-1 Receptor Gene and Protein Expression in Brain Regions Involved in Addiction and Reward

    Yun Liu;Guang-Di Chen;Megan R. Lerner;Daniel J. Brackett

  • Intermittent noise-induced hearing loss and the influence of carbon monoxide.

    Guang-Di Chen;Misty L. McWilliams;Laurence D. Fechter

  • Relation between outer hair cell loss and hearing loss in rats exposed to styrene.

    Guang-Di Chen;Chiemi Tanaka;Donald Henderson

  • Potentiation of noise-induced hearing loss by low concentrations of hydrogen cyanide in rats.

    Laurence D. Fechter;Guang-Di Chen;David L. Johnson

  • Age-related hearing loss in the Fischer 344/NHsd rat substrain

    Eric C. Bielefeld;Donald Coling;Guang-Di Chen;Manna Li

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard Salvi
Richard Salvi University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Donald Henderson
Donald Henderson University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Jian Wang
Jian Wang Dalhousie University
Rosemarie Grantyn
Rosemarie Grantyn Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Brian L. Allman
Brian L. Allman University of Western Ontario
Christian Henneberger
Christian Henneberger University of Bonn
Kenneth R. Johnson
Kenneth R. Johnson The Jackson Laboratory
Tomas A. Prolla
Tomas A. Prolla University of Wisconsin–Madison
Masaru Tanokura
Masaru Tanokura University of Tokyo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience opens doors to a variety of related online degrees and career paths in mental health and social sciences. Many students interested in neuroscience also consider programs in psychology, therapy, and social work. Online degrees offer flexible options tailored to different interests and budgets.

For those interested in therapy, several affordable online mft programs provide training in marriage and family therapy. Psychology remains a popular route, but it’s important to consider costs, as students often ask how much does it cost to get a masters in psychology.

If you’re looking for a broader foundation, earning a psychology degree online is practical and can lead to diverse careers in healthcare, education, or research. For a career centered on social support and advocacy, you might also want to consider the easiest msw program for entry into social work.

These related online degrees not only expand your skillset but also open multiple pathways for meaningful work in neuroscience and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Guang-Di Chen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles