World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
55
Citations
8766
World Ranking
4800
National Ranking
2158

Donald Henderson publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donald Henderson sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 190 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Donald Henderson D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donald Henderson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Donald Henderson was affiliated with the University at Buffalo, State University of New York, in the United States. Throughout their academic career, they contributed to the scientific community from this institution.

As an active researcher, they did not have recent papers listed, nor did they publish frequently in identified venues or maintain a recorded list of co-authors. There is no detailed record of specific topics or fields of study associated with their research output. Similarly, there are no available records of book publications linked to their profile.

Information about awards or recognitions has not been documented in the available data. Their scientific legacy remains recorded primarily through their institutional affiliation and presence in academic records, though detailed contributions and collaborations remain unspecified.

Best Publications

  • Involvement of apoptosis in progression of cochlear lesion following exposure to intense noise.

    Bo Hua Hu;Donald Henderson;Thomas M Nicotera

  • New Perspectives on Noise-Induced Hearing Loss

    Colleen G. Le Prell;Donald Henderson

  • The Caspase Pathway in Noise-Induced Apoptosis of the Chinchilla Cochlea

    Thomas M. Nicotera;Bo Hua Hu;Donald Henderson

  • Anatomical correlates of impulse noise-induced mechanical damage in the cochlea.

    Roger P. Hamernik;George Turrentine;Michael Roberto;Richard Salvi

  • Individual susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss: an old topic revisited.

    Donald Henderson;Malini Subramaniam;Flint A. Boettcher

  • R-phenylisopropyladenosine attenuates noise-induced hearing loss in the chinchilla.

    Bo Hua Hu;Xiang Yang Zheng;Sandra L. McFadden;Richard D. Kopke

  • Changes in cochlear antioxidant enzyme activity after sound conditioning and noise exposure in the chinchilla

    Unknown

  • Intense noise-induced apoptosis in hair cells of guinea pig cochleae.

    Bo Hua Hu;Wei Guo;Pei Ying Wang;Donald Henderson

  • Extremely rapid induction of outer hair cell apoptosis in the chinchilla cochlea following exposure to impulse noise.

    Bo Hua Hu;Donald Henderson;Thomas M. Nicotera

  • Hearing loss following exposure during development to polychlorinated biphenyls: a cochlear site of action.

    Kevin M. Crofton;Da-Lian Ding;Robert Padich;Michele Taylor

  • Auditory System Plasticity and Regeneration

    Donald Henderson;R. J. Salvi

  • Noise-induced hearing loss in chinchillas pre-treated with glutathione monoethylester and R-PIA.

    Nancy G Hight;Sandra L McFadden;Donald Henderson;Robert F Burkard

  • Age-related hearing loss: is it a preventable condition?

    Eric C. Bielefeld;Chiemi Tanaka;Guang-di Chen;Donald Henderson

  • The effect of 'conditioning' exposures on hearing loss from traumatic exposure.

    Pierre Campo;Malini Subramaniam;Donald Henderson

  • The role of the cochlear efferent system in acquired resistance to noise-induced hearing loss.

    Xiang-Yang Zheng;Donald Henderson;Sandra L. McFadden;Bo-Hua Hu

  • Too much of a good thing: Long-term treatment with salicylate strengthens outer hair cell function but impairs auditory neural activity

    Guang-Di Chen;Mohammad Habiby Kermany;Alessandra D’Elia;Massimo Ralli;Massimo Ralli

  • The influence of the cochlear efferent system on chronic acoustic trauma.

    Xiang-Yang Zheng;Donald Henderson;Bo-Hua Hu;Da-Lian Ding

  • Evidence that inner hair cells are the major source of cochlear summating potentials

    Xiang-Yang Zheng;Da-Lian Ding;Sandra L. McFadden;Donald Henderson

  • Basic and Applied Aspects of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss

    Richard J. Salvi;D. Henderson;R. P. Hamernik;V. Colletti

  • Aging outer hair cells (OHCs) in the Fischer 344 rat cochlea: function and morphology.

    Guang-Di Chen;Manna Li;Chiemi Tanaka;Eric C. Bielefeld

  • Prevention of noise-induced hearing loss with Src-PTK inhibitors

    Kelly Carney Harris;Kelly Carney Harris;Bohua Hu;Bohua Hu;David Hangauer;David Hangauer;Donald Henderson;Donald Henderson

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard Salvi
Richard Salvi University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Sandra L. McFadden
Sandra L. McFadden University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Guang-Di Chen
Guang-Di Chen University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Arthur N. Popper
Arthur N. Popper University of Maryland, College Park
Howard Faden
Howard Faden University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Barbara Canlon
Barbara Canlon Karolinska Institute
Jian Wang
Jian Wang Dalhousie University
Kevin M. Crofton
Kevin M. Crofton R3Fellows LLC

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in the wider fields related to neuroscience? Many students enhance their neuroscience education with online degrees in psychology, therapy, and social work. These paths can provide a more holistic understanding of mental health, behavior, and brain function. When considering your options, it's important to choose accredited programs that fit your goals and budget.

For those looking into therapeutic practices, marriage and family therapy online programs accredited offer a direct route to clinical roles. Similarly, pursuing psychology masters online can expand your specialization and job prospects in research or counseling.

If you're starting your journey, consider reviewing the psychology degrees available fully online, which can provide a strong foundation for a wide variety of pathways. Additionally, some may prefer the accessibility of the easiest msw programs to get into to start a career in social work and mental health services. These options make it possible to build a diverse and impactful career alongside neuroscience studies.

Best Scientists Citing Donald Henderson

Recently Published Articles