World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
70
Citations
15138
World Ranking
2546
National Ranking
1203

Josef M. Miller publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Josef M. Miller sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 260 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Josef M. Miller D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Josef M. Miller sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Josef M. Miller was affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their academic career included research and scholarly activities predominantly connected with this institution.

No specific information on recent papers, including titles, years of publication, or publication venues, was available for Josef M. Miller. Similarly, there were no records of frequent co-authors, which suggests a lack of publicly documented collaboration networks.

There was also no data on frequent publication venues, indicating that the scholar's publication history either spanned diverse platforms or was not cataloged in the provided source.

No book publications linked to Josef M. Miller were recorded, nor were there detailed data covering main or subfields of study. Consequently, the primary academic interests and research domains remain unspecified.

The absence of documented main topics of work leaves their specific scientific focus or thematic areas unrecorded in the accessible data.

There is no record of awards or honors attributed to Josef M. Miller, and the data confirms that they are deceased.

Best Publications

  • Mechanisms of noise-induced hearing loss indicate multiple methods of prevention.

    Colleen G. Le Prell;Daisuke Yamashita;Shujiro B. Minami;Tatsuya Yamasoba

  • Delayed production of free radicals following noise exposure.

    Daisuke Yamashita;Hong Yan Jiang;Jochen Schacht;Josef M. Miller;Josef M. Miller

  • Intense noise induces formation of vasoactive lipid peroxidation products in the cochlea.

    Yoshimitsu Ohinata;Josef M. Miller;Richard A. Altschuler;Jochen Schacht

  • Neurotrophins can enhance spiral ganglion cell survival after inner hair cell loss

    Josef M. Miller;David H. Chi;Leonard J. O'Keeffe;Paul Kruszka

  • Glutathione limits noise-induced hearing loss.

    Yoshimitsu Ohinata;Yoshimitsu Ohinata;Tatsuya Yamasoba;Jochen Schacht;Josef M. Miller

  • Neurotrophic factor intervention restores auditory function in deafened animals

    Takayuki Shinohara;Göran Bredberg;Mats Ulfendahl;Ilmari Pyykkö

  • Free radical scavengers vitamins A, C, and E plus magnesium reduce noise trauma.

    Colleen G. Le Prell;Larry F. Hughes;Josef M. Miller;Josef M. Miller

  • Direct inner ear infusion of dexamethasone attenuates noise-induced trauma in guinea pig

    Keiji Takemura;Mototane Komeda;Masao Yagi;Chiemi Himeno

  • Guinea pig auditory neurons are protected by glial cell line-derived growth factor from degeneration after noise trauma

    J Ylikoski;U Pirvola;J Virkkala;P Suvanto

  • Role of glutathione in protection against noise-induced hearing loss

    Tatsuya Yamasoba;Alfred L Nuttall;Alfred L Nuttall;Craig Harris;Yehoash Raphael

  • Relation of psychophysical data to histopathology in monkeys with cochlear implants.

    Bryan E. Pfingst;Dwight Sutton;Josef M. Miller;Barbara A. Bohne

  • Protection from noise-induced lipid peroxidation and hair cell loss in the cochlea.

    Yoshimitsu Ohinata;Josef M. Miller;Josef M. Miller;Jochen Schacht

  • Attenuation of cochlear damage from noise trauma by an iron chelator, a free radical scavenger and glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor in vivo.

    Tatsuya Yamasoba;Jochen Schacht;Fumi Shoji;Josef M Miller

  • Post-exposure treatment attenuates noise-induced hearing loss.

    D. Yamashita;H.-Y. Jiang;C.G. Le Prell;J. Schacht

  • Osmotic pump implant for chronic infusion of drugs into the inner ear

    J.Nadine Brown;Josef M. Miller;Richard A. Altschuler;Alfred L. Nuttall

  • Deafferentiation-associated changes in afferent and efferent processes in the guinea pig cochlea and afferent regeneration with chronic intrascalar brain-derived neurotrophic factor and acidic fibroblast growth factor

    Rudolf Glueckert;Mario Bitsche;Josef M. Miller;Josef M. Miller;Yaying Zhu

  • Direct evidence of trigeminal innervation of the cochlear blood vessels

    Z Vass;S.E Shore;S.E Shore;A.L Nuttall;J.M Miller

  • Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor and chronic electrical stimulation prevent VIII cranial nerve degeneration following denervation.

    Sho Kanzaki;Timo Stöver;Kohei Kawamoto;Kohei Kawamoto;Diane M. Prieskorn

  • Intra-cochlear administration of dexamethasone attenuates aminoglycoside ototoxicity in the guinea pig.

    Chiemi Himeno;Mototane Komeda;Masahiko Izumikawa;Keiji Takemura

  • Regeneration of human auditory nerve. In vitro/in video demonstration of neural progenitor cells in adult human and guinea pig spiral ganglion

    Helge Rask-Andersen;Marja Boström;Bengt Gerdin;Anders Kinnefors

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard A. Altschuler
Richard A. Altschuler University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Alfred L. Nuttall
Alfred L. Nuttall Oregon Health & Science University
Yehoash Raphael
Yehoash Raphael University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Bryan E. Pfingst
Bryan E. Pfingst University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jochen Schacht
Jochen Schacht University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
David F. Dolan
David F. Dolan University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Mats Ulfendahl
Mats Ulfendahl Karolinska Institute
Susan E. Shore
Susan E. Shore University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
David J. Anderson
David J. Anderson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Anne Didier
Anne Didier Claude Bernard University Lyon 1

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Josef M. Miller

Recently Published Articles