World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 70 2546 1203 260 15138

Josef M. Miller publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Josef M. Miller between 1966 and 2017, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Josef M. Miller published across 52 years, from 1966 to 2017, averaging 5.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 1995. 14 of the 273 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1966 to 2017. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 1995. 1966: 1 publication 1967: 1 publication 1968: 0 publications 1969: 2 publications 1970: 2 publications 1971: 2 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 5 publications 1975: 7 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 2 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 2 publications 1980: 7 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 2 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 8 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 11 publications 1990: 12 publications 1991: 12 publications 1992: 10 publications 1993: 13 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 14 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 4 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 4 publications
1966 2017

273 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Josef M. Miller: publications per year, 1966 to 2017
Year Publications
1966 1
1967 1
1968 0
1969 2
1970 2
1971 2
1972 0
1973 1
1974 5
1975 7
1976 1
1977 2
1978 1
1979 2
1980 7
1981 1
1982 2
1983 4
1984 2
1985 5
1986 4
1987 8
1988 4
1989 11
1990 12
1991 12
1992 10
1993 13
1994 8
1995 14
1996 3
1997 9
1998 9
1999 8
2000 11
2001 2
2002 7
2003 12
2004 9
2005 2
2006 4
2007 7
2008 7
2009 4
2010 3
2011 2
2012 4
2013 1
2014 4
2015 7
2016 10
2017 4
Total 273
Download as CSV

Josef M. Miller publications per year - data summary

  • Josef M. Miller, a Neuroscience scholar from University of Michigan–Ann Arbor, has 273 publications recorded across 52 years, from 1966 to 2017.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1966 and the most recent to 2017.
  • The most productive year is 1995, with 14 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1966, 1967, 1973, 1976 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 2 of the 52 years in the span carry no publications at all (1968 and 1972).
  • The rate of publication averages 5.3 papers per year over the whole span, or 5.5 per year counting only the 50 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2013-2017) hold 26 publications, 10% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1966-1983: 41 publications (2.3 per year); 1984-2001: 145 publications (8.1 per year); 2002-2017: 87 publications (5.4 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Josef M. Miller publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Josef M. Miller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 258–267 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 260 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176 260
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Josef M. Miller publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 9,597 Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 38–47 to 887+ publications.
  • Josef M. Miller, a Neuroscience scholar from University of Michigan–Ann Arbor, records 260 publications - the 76th percentile of the discipline.
  • 76% of ranked Neuroscience scientists score the same or lower than Josef M. Miller, and about 24% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 158–167 publications range, and Josef M. Miller ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 98–107 publications, holding 539 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 76% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 248–257 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 887 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Josef M. Miller D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Josef M. Miller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 70–71 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210 70
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Josef M. Miller D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 9,597 Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 68 ranges running from 30–31 to 163+ D-Index.
  • Josef M. Miller, a Neuroscience scholar from University of Michigan–Ann Arbor, records 70 D-Index - the 74th percentile of the discipline.
  • 74% of ranked Neuroscience scientists score the same or lower than Josef M. Miller, and about 26% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 54–55 D-Index range, and Josef M. Miller ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 46–47 D-Index, holding 512 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 65% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 62–63 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Josef M. Miller was affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their academic career included research and scholarly activities predominantly connected with this institution.

No specific information on recent papers, including titles, years of publication, or publication venues, was available for Josef M. Miller. Similarly, there were no records of frequent co-authors, which suggests a lack of publicly documented collaboration networks.

There was also no data on frequent publication venues, indicating that the scholar's publication history either spanned diverse platforms or was not cataloged in the provided source.

No book publications linked to Josef M. Miller were recorded, nor were there detailed data covering main or subfields of study. Consequently, the primary academic interests and research domains remain unspecified.

The absence of documented main topics of work leaves their specific scientific focus or thematic areas unrecorded in the accessible data.

There is no record of awards or honors attributed to Josef M. Miller, and the data confirms that they are deceased.

Best Publications

  • Mechanisms of noise-induced hearing loss indicate multiple methods of prevention.

    Colleen G. Le Prell;Daisuke Yamashita;Shujiro B. Minami;Tatsuya Yamasoba

  • Delayed production of free radicals following noise exposure.

    Daisuke Yamashita;Hong Yan Jiang;Jochen Schacht;Josef M. Miller;Josef M. Miller

  • Intense noise induces formation of vasoactive lipid peroxidation products in the cochlea.

    Yoshimitsu Ohinata;Josef M. Miller;Richard A. Altschuler;Jochen Schacht

  • Neurotrophins can enhance spiral ganglion cell survival after inner hair cell loss

    Josef M. Miller;David H. Chi;Leonard J. O'Keeffe;Paul Kruszka

  • Glutathione limits noise-induced hearing loss.

    Yoshimitsu Ohinata;Yoshimitsu Ohinata;Tatsuya Yamasoba;Jochen Schacht;Josef M. Miller

  • Neurotrophic factor intervention restores auditory function in deafened animals

    Takayuki Shinohara;Göran Bredberg;Mats Ulfendahl;Ilmari Pyykkö

  • Free radical scavengers vitamins A, C, and E plus magnesium reduce noise trauma.

    Colleen G. Le Prell;Larry F. Hughes;Josef M. Miller;Josef M. Miller

  • Direct inner ear infusion of dexamethasone attenuates noise-induced trauma in guinea pig

    Keiji Takemura;Mototane Komeda;Masao Yagi;Chiemi Himeno

  • Guinea pig auditory neurons are protected by glial cell line-derived growth factor from degeneration after noise trauma

    J Ylikoski;U Pirvola;J Virkkala;P Suvanto

  • Role of glutathione in protection against noise-induced hearing loss

    Tatsuya Yamasoba;Alfred L Nuttall;Alfred L Nuttall;Craig Harris;Yehoash Raphael

  • Relation of psychophysical data to histopathology in monkeys with cochlear implants.

    Bryan E. Pfingst;Dwight Sutton;Josef M. Miller;Barbara A. Bohne

  • Protection from noise-induced lipid peroxidation and hair cell loss in the cochlea.

    Yoshimitsu Ohinata;Josef M. Miller;Josef M. Miller;Jochen Schacht

  • Attenuation of cochlear damage from noise trauma by an iron chelator, a free radical scavenger and glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor in vivo.

    Tatsuya Yamasoba;Jochen Schacht;Fumi Shoji;Josef M Miller

  • Post-exposure treatment attenuates noise-induced hearing loss.

    D. Yamashita;H.-Y. Jiang;C.G. Le Prell;J. Schacht

  • Osmotic pump implant for chronic infusion of drugs into the inner ear

    J.Nadine Brown;Josef M. Miller;Richard A. Altschuler;Alfred L. Nuttall

  • Deafferentiation-associated changes in afferent and efferent processes in the guinea pig cochlea and afferent regeneration with chronic intrascalar brain-derived neurotrophic factor and acidic fibroblast growth factor

    Rudolf Glueckert;Mario Bitsche;Josef M. Miller;Josef M. Miller;Yaying Zhu

  • Direct evidence of trigeminal innervation of the cochlear blood vessels

    Z Vass;S.E Shore;S.E Shore;A.L Nuttall;J.M Miller

  • Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor and chronic electrical stimulation prevent VIII cranial nerve degeneration following denervation.

    Sho Kanzaki;Timo Stöver;Kohei Kawamoto;Kohei Kawamoto;Diane M. Prieskorn

  • Intra-cochlear administration of dexamethasone attenuates aminoglycoside ototoxicity in the guinea pig.

    Chiemi Himeno;Mototane Komeda;Masahiko Izumikawa;Keiji Takemura

  • Regeneration of human auditory nerve. In vitro/in video demonstration of neural progenitor cells in adult human and guinea pig spiral ganglion

    Helge Rask-Andersen;Marja Boström;Bengt Gerdin;Anders Kinnefors

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard A. Altschuler
Richard A. Altschuler University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Alfred L. Nuttall
Alfred L. Nuttall Oregon Health & Science University
Yehoash Raphael
Yehoash Raphael University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Bryan E. Pfingst
Bryan E. Pfingst University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jochen Schacht
Jochen Schacht University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
David F. Dolan
David F. Dolan University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Mats Ulfendahl
Mats Ulfendahl Karolinska Institute
Susan E. Shore
Susan E. Shore University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
David J. Anderson
David J. Anderson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Anne Didier
Anne Didier Claude Bernard University Lyon 1

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Josef M. Miller

Recently Published Articles