World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
33
Citations
3477
World Ranking
9476
National Ranking
462

Anne Didier publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anne Didier sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 60 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Anne Didier D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anne Didier sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anne Didier is affiliated with Claude Bernard University Lyon 1 in France and has a research focus primarily within the field of Neuroscience. Their work extensively addresses sensory systems, with a particular concentration on olfactory and sensory function studies.

Their recent publications demonstrate ongoing exploration of olfactory processes and neural mechanisms underpinning sensory perception, memory, and aging. Notable papers include:

  • Neural processing of the reward value of pleasant odorants, 2021, Current Biology
  • 12 months is a pivotal age for olfactory perceptual learning and its underlying neuronal plasticity in aging mice, 2022, Neurobiology of Aging
  • Chronic unpredictable mild stress alters odor hedonics and adult olfactory neurogenesis in mice, 2023, Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • Long-term olfactory enrichment promotes non-olfactory cognition, noradrenergic plasticity and remodeling of brain functional connectivity in older mice, 2024, Neurobiology of Aging
  • Noradrenergic Activity in the Olfactory Bulb Is a Key Element for the Stability of Olfactory Memory, 2020, Journal of Neuroscience

The research spans several topics relevant to olfactory sensory functions, memory, and neuroplasticity. Main topics covered include:

  • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
  • Behavioral and Psychological Studies

Didier's scholarly output primarily appears in venues such as:

  • Peer community in neuroscience.
  • Neurobiology of Aging
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Revue des Maladies Respiratoires Actualités
  • Current Biology

The scientist collaborates frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Nathalie Mandairon
  • Marc Thévenet
  • Marion Richard
  • Maëllie Midroit
  • Jérémy Forest

These collaborations support research in specialized subfields such as sensory systems, cellular and molecular neuroscience, cognitive neuroscience, and neurology. Other fields touched upon include general health professions.

Anne Didier's research contributes to understanding neural plasticity, olfactory learning, and the impact of aging and stress on sensory and cognitive functions in animal models.

Best Publications

  • Olfactory perceptual learning requires adult neurogenesis

    Mélissa M. Moreno;Christiane Linster;Olga Escanilla;Joëlle Sacquet

  • Pharmacological Blockade of 5-HT7 Receptors as a Putative Fast Acting Antidepressant Strategy

    Ouissame Mnie-Filali;Céline Faure;Laura Lambás-Señas;Mostafa El Mansari

  • Acoustic responses recorded from the saccular bundle on the eighth nerve of the guinea pig

    Anne Didier;Yves Cazals

  • Learning-dependent neurogenesis in the olfactory bulb determines long-term olfactory memory

    S. Sultan;N. Mandairon;F. Kermen;S. Garcia

  • Deprivation of sensory inputs to the olfactory bulb up-regulates cell death and proliferation in the subventricular zone of adult mice.

    N Mandairon;F Jourdan;A Didier

  • Long-term fate and distribution of newborn cells in the adult mouse olfactory bulb: Influences of olfactory deprivation.

    N. Mandairon;J. Sacquet;F. Jourdan;A. Didier

  • Novelty determines the effects of olfactory enrichment on memory and neurogenesis through noradrenergic mechanisms.

    Alexandra Veyrac;Joëlle Sacquet;Véronique Nguyen;Marc Marien

  • Neurogenic correlates of an olfactory discrimination task in the adult olfactory bulb

    Nathalie Mandairon;Joëlle Sacquet;Samuel Garcia;Nadine Ravel

  • Molecular complexity determines the number of olfactory notes and the pleasantness of smells

    F. Kermen;F. Kermen;A. Chakirian;A. Chakirian;C. Sezille;C. Sezille;P. Joussain;P. Joussain

  • Humans and Mice Express Similar Olfactory Preferences

    Nathalie Mandairon;Johan Poncelet;Moustafa Bensafi;Anne Didier

  • Early locus coeruleus degeneration and olfactory dysfunctions in Tg2576 mice.

    Delphine Guérin;Joëlle Sacquet;Nathalie Mandairon;François Jourdan

  • A dendrodendritic reciprocal synapse provides a recurrent excitatory connection in the olfactory bulb.

    Anne Didier;Alan Carleton;Jan G. Bjaalie;Jean-Didier Vincent

  • Noradrenergic neuromodulation in the olfactory bulb modulates odor habituation and spontaneous discrimination.

    Delphine Guérin;Shane T Peace;Anne Didier;Christiane Linster

  • Action of the Noradrenergic System on Adult-Born Cells Is Required for Olfactory Learning in Mice

    Melissa M. Moreno;Kevin Bath;Nicola Kuczewski;Joëlle Sacquet

  • Cochlear blood flow in response to dilating agents

    K.Agnetha Ohlsén;Anne Didier;David Baldwin;Josef M Miller

  • Odor enrichment increases interneurons responsiveness in spatially defined regions of the olfactory bulb correlated with perception.

    Nathalie Mandairon;Anne Didier;Christiane Linster

  • Locus coeruleus degeneration exacerbates olfactory deficits in APP/PS1 transgenic mice

    Nolwen L. Rey;Daniel Jardanhazi-Kurutz;Dick Terwel;Markus P. Kummer

  • Stellate ganglion drives sympathetic regulation of cochlear blood flow

    Esa A. Laurikainen;David Kim;Anne Didier;Tianying Ren

  • Involvement of Newborn Neurons in Olfactory Associative Learning? The Operant or Non-operant Component of the Task Makes All the Difference

    Nathalie Mandairon;Sébastien Sultan;Morgane Nouvian;Joelle Sacquet

  • Noradrenergic control of odor recognition in a nonassociative olfactory learning task in the mouse.

    Alexandra Veyrac;Véronique Nguyen;Marc Marien;Anne Didier

  • The vascular component of sodium salicylate ototoxicity in the guinea pig

    Anne Didier;Josef M. Miller;Alfred L. Nuttall

Frequent Co-Authors

Christiane Linster
Christiane Linster Cornell University
Moustafa Bensafi
Moustafa Bensafi Grenoble Alpes University
Josef M. Miller
Josef M. Miller University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Alfred L. Nuttall
Alfred L. Nuttall Oregon Health & Science University
Daniel W. Wesson
Daniel W. Wesson University of Florida
Jon Storm-Mathisen
Jon Storm-Mathisen University of Oslo
Charles A. Greer
Charles A. Greer Yale University
Ole Petter Ottersen
Ole Petter Ottersen University of Oslo
Olivier Raineteau
Olivier Raineteau Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Reidar Grénman
Reidar Grénman Turku University Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in Neuroscience, there are a variety of online degrees and career options that can complement or enhance your academic journey. Many students pursue fields related to mental health, therapy, and psychology, often choosing flexible online programs to fit their schedules.

A strong foundational pathway is to explore cacrep accredited schools for counseling, as these programs ensure a standard of quality respected by employers. There are a range of online counseling programs that provide affordable, accessible routes into the profession, offering online coursework in areas relevant to neuroscience and mental health.

For those interested in family dynamics and relationships, pursuing mft programs (Marriage and Family Therapy) can pave the way for impactful clinical work. Alternatively, earning one of the top online psychology masters degrees can deepen your understanding of cognitive science and psychological research.

These flexible graduate pathways equip you with valuable knowledge and practical skills, preparing you for diverse roles in mental health, counseling, research, and therapy—all of which align closely with the expertise gained in Neuroscience studies.

Best Scientists Citing Anne Didier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles