World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
35
Citations
6528
World Ranking
9137
National Ranking
3854

Daniel W. Wesson publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel W. Wesson sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 94 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Daniel W. Wesson D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel W. Wesson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel W. Wesson is affiliated with the University of Florida in the United States and conducts research primarily in the field of Neuroscience. Their body of work encompasses multiple specialized subfields, including Sensory Systems, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Nutrition and Dietetics, and Neurology.

The scientist's research topics cover a range of areas focused on sensory and neurological functions. These include:

  • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
  • Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Wesson has published extensively, contributing 75 works within Neuroscience and especially in the subfields mentioned. The most frequent venues for publication include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) with 11 papers, SSRN Electronic Journal with 3 papers, Nature Neuroscience and Nature Communications with 2 papers each, and Cell Reports with 2 papers.

Among their recent publications are:

  • "Deficits in olfactory sensitivity in a mouse model of Parkinson's disease revealed by plethysmography of odor-evoked sniffing" (2020, Scientific Reports)
  • "Ventral striatal islands of Calleja neurons control grooming in mice" (2021, Nature Neuroscience)
  • "A Neural System that Represents the Association of Odors with Rewarded Outcomes and Promotes Behavioral Engagement" (2020, Cell Reports)
  • "The Tubular Striatum" (2020, Journal of Neuroscience)
  • "Neural processing of the reward value of pleasant odorants" (2021, Current Biology)

The scientist has collaborated frequently with a number of coauthors, most notably:

  • Minghong Ma (16 publications)
  • Emma J. Blain (10 publications)
  • Natalie L. Johnson (10 publications)
  • Janardhan P. Bhattarai (9 publications)
  • Patrik Brundin (8 publications)

Best Publications

  • ApoE-directed therapeutics rapidly clear β-amyloid and reverse deficits in AD mouse models.

    Paige E. Cramer;John R. Cirrito;Daniel W. Wesson;Daniel W. Wesson;C. Y. Daniel Lee

  • Reversal of autophagy dysfunction in the TgCRND8 mouse model of Alzheimer's disease ameliorates amyloid pathologies and memory deficits.

    Dun Sheng Yang;Dun Sheng Yang;Philip Stavrides;Panaiyur S. Mohan;Panaiyur S. Mohan;Susmita Kaushik

  • Sniffing controls an adaptive filter of sensory input to the olfactory bulb

    Justus V Verhagen;Daniel W Wesson;Theoden I Netoff;John A White

  • Olfactory Dysfunction Correlates with Amyloid-β Burden in an Alzheimer's Disease Mouse Model

    Daniel W. Wesson;Efrat Levy;Ralph A. Nixon;Donald A. Wilson

  • Sniffing Behavior of Mice during Performance in Odor-Guided Tasks

    Daniel W. Wesson;Tanya N. Donahou;Marc O. Johnson;Matt Wachowiak

  • The olfactory bulb as the entry site for prion-like propagation in neurodegenerative diseases.

    Nolwen L. Rey;Daniel W. Wesson;Patrik Brundin

  • Response to comments on "ApoE-directed therapeutics rapidly clear β-amyloid and reverse deficits in AD mouse models"

    Gary E. Landreth;Paige E. Cramer;Mitchell M. Lakner;John R. Cirrito

  • Rapid encoding and perception of novel odors in the rat.

    Daniel W Wesson;Ryan M Carey;Justus V Verhagen;Matt Wachowiak

  • Sniffing out the contributions of the olfactory tubercle to the sense of smell: Hedonics, sensory integration, and more?

    Daniel W. Wesson;Donald A. Wilson;Donald A. Wilson;Donald A. Wilson

  • Temporal Structure of Receptor Neuron Input to the Olfactory Bulb Imaged in Behaving Rats

    Ryan M. Carey;Justus V. Verhagen;Daniel W. Wesson;Nicolás Pírez

  • Smelling Sounds: Olfactory–Auditory Sensory Convergence in the Olfactory Tubercle

    Daniel W. Wesson;Donald A. Wilson;Donald A. Wilson

  • Sniffing behavior communicates social hierarchy.

    Daniel W. Wesson

  • Sensory Network Dysfunction, Behavioral Impairments, and Their Reversibility in an Alzheimer's β-Amyloidosis Mouse Model

    Daniel W. Wesson;Anne H. Borkowski;Gary E. Landreth;Ralph A. Nixon;Ralph A. Nixon

  • Optical Dissection of Odor Information Processing In Vivo Using GCaMPs Expressed in Specified Cell Types of the Olfactory Bulb

    Matt Wachowiak;Matt Wachowiak;Matt Wachowiak;Michael N. Economo;Marta Díaz-Quesada;Daniela Brunert

  • The Olfactory Tubercle Encodes Odor Valence in Behaving Mice

    Marie A. Gadziola;Kate A. Tylicki;Diana L. Christian;Daniel W. Wesson

  • Why sniff fast? The relationship between sniff frequency, odor discrimination, and receptor neuron activation in the rat.

    Daniel W. Wesson;Justus V. Verhagen;Justus V. Verhagen;Matt Wachowiak

  • Therapeutic effects of remediating autophagy failure in a mouse model of Alzheimer disease by enhancing lysosomal proteolysis

    Dun-Sheng Yang;Dun-Sheng Yang;Philip Stavrides;Panaiyur S. Mohan;Panaiyur S. Mohan;Susmita Kaushik

  • Age and gene overexpression interact to abolish nesting behavior in Tg2576 amyloid precursor protein (APP) mice

    Daniel W. Wesson;Donald A. Wilson;Donald A. Wilson;Donald A. Wilson

  • Enhanced urinary odor discrimination in female aromatase knockout (ArKO) mice.

    Daniel W. Wesson;Matthieu Keller;Quentin Douhard;Michael J. Baum

  • Deficits in olfactory sensitivity in a mouse model of Parkinson’s disease revealed by plethysmography of odor-evoked sniffing

    Michaela E. Johnson;Liza Bergkvist;Gabriela Mercado;Lucas Stetzik

  • Should olfactory dysfunction be used as a biomarker of Alzheimer's disease?

    Daniel W Wesson;Donald A Wilson;Ralph A Nixon

Frequent Co-Authors

Donald A. Wilson
Donald A. Wilson Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research
Ralph A. Nixon
Ralph A. Nixon Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research
Patrik Brundin
Patrik Brundin Roche (United States)
Matt Wachowiak
Matt Wachowiak University of Utah
Paul M. Mathews
Paul M. Mathews New York University
Asok Kumar
Asok Kumar Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research
Stephen D. Schmidt
Stephen D. Schmidt National Institutes of Health
Masuo Ohno
Masuo Ohno Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research
Gary E. Landreth
Gary E. Landreth Indiana University
John A. White
John A. White Boston University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience opens diverse career opportunities, many of which intersect with counseling, psychology, and therapy fields. If you want more flexibility or to specialize further, online degrees can be a practical route.

For those interested in counseling, there are several options for cacrep-accredited programs online, ensuring high educational standards and greater eligibility for certification. Students often look for an online counseling degree accredited by recognized bodies for credibility and improved job prospects.

If you’re drawn to family or relationship dynamics, an online master's degree in marriage and family therapy offers a focused path. Meanwhile, those seeking affordable graduate credentials in the wider field may consider the cheapest online master's degree in psychology.

These online pathways provide flexibility and accessibility for students balancing work, family, or geographic limitations, making advanced study and specialized career options more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel W. Wesson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles