World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Casper Lassenius

Casper Lassenius

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
44
Citations
7702
World Ranking
7598
National Ranking
58

Casper Lassenius publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Casper Lassenius sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 142 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Casper Lassenius D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Casper Lassenius sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Casper Lassenius is affiliated with Aalto University in Finland. Their research predominantly spans the fields of computer science and business, management, and accounting with a strong focus on various subfields including information systems, management information systems, strategy and management, computer networks and communications, and management of technology and innovation.

The scientist has contributed extensively to topics related to software engineering techniques and practices, software engineering research, and software system performance and reliability. Other notable research topics include outsourcing and supply chain management, collaboration in agile enterprises, sustainable supply chain management, and public procurement and policy.

Casper Lassenius's work appears frequently in several publication venues. The most common journals and repositories include:

  • Empirical Software Engineering
  • Journal of Systems and Software
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Their recent notable papers are:

  • "Finding the sweet spot for organizational control and team autonomy in large-scale agile software development" (2021, Empirical Software Engineering)
  • "Revealing the state of the art of large-scale agile development research: A systematic mapping study" (2022, Journal of Systems and Software)
  • "Archetypes of delay: An analysis of online developer conversations on delayed work items in IBM Jazz" (2020, Information and Software Technology)
  • "SAFe transformation in a large financial corporation" (2023, Empirical Software Engineering)
  • "Revealing the State of the Art of Large-Scale Agile Development Research: A Systematic Mapping Study" (2020, arXiv (Cornell University))

In addition to journal papers, Casper Lassenius has contributed to book publications, including the title "Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming" published by Springer Science+Business Media in 2021.

The scientist collaborates frequently with several co-authors, reflecting ongoing partnerships in their research community. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Maria Paasivaara
  • Abheeshta Putta
  • Jefferson Seide Molléri
  • Ömer Uludağ
  • Magne Jørgensen

Best Publications

  • Challenges and success factors for large-scale agile transformations

    Kim Dikert;Maria Paasivaara;Casper Lassenius

  • Naming the pain in requirements engineering

    D. Méndez Fernández;S. Wagner;M. Kalinowski;M. Felderer

  • A taxonomy and an initial empirical study of bad smells in code

    M. Mantyla;J. Vanhanen;C. Lassenius

  • What Types of Defects Are Really Discovered in Code Reviews

    M.V. Mantyla;C. Lassenius

  • Perceived causes of software project failures - An analysis of their relationships

    Timo O. A. Lehtinen;Mika V. Mäntylä;Jari Vanhanen;Juha Itkonen

  • Using Scrum in Distributed Agile Development: A Multiple Case Study

    Maria Paasivaara;Sandra Durasiewicz;Casper Lassenius

  • Subjective evaluation of software evolvability using code smells: An empirical study

    Mika V. Mäntylä;Casper Lassenius

  • Communities of practice in a large distributed agile software development organization – Case Ericsson

    Maria Paasivaara;Casper Lassenius

  • DevOps in practice: A multiple case study of five companies

    Lucy Ellen Lwakatare;Terhi Kilamo;Teemu Karvonen;Tanja Sauvola

  • Large-scale agile transformation at Ericsson: a case study

    Maria Paasivaara;Benjamin Behm;Casper Lassenius;Minna Hallikainen

  • Collaboration Practices in Global Inter-organizational Software Development Projects

    Maria Paasivaara;Casper Lassenius

  • Problems, Causes and Solutions When Adopting Continuous Delivery - A Systematic Literature Review

    Eero Laukkanen;Juha V.A. Itkonen;Casper Lassenius

  • Distributed Agile Development: Using Scrum in a Large Project

    M. Paasivaara;S. Durasiewicz;C. Lassenius

  • Inter-team coordination in large-scale globally distributed scrum: do scrum-of-scrums really work?

    Maria Paasivaara;Casper Lassenius;Ville T. Heikkilä

  • Emerging themes in agile software development: Introduction to the special section on continuous value delivery

    Torgeir Dingsøyr;Torgeir Dingsøyr;Casper Lassenius

  • Bad smells - humans as code critics

    M.V. Mantyla;J. Vanhanen;C. Lassenius

  • Could Global Software Development Benefit from Agile Methods

    Maria Paasivaara;Casper Lassenius

  • A Mapping Study on Requirements Engineering in Agile Software Development

    Ville T. Heikkila;Daniela Damian;Casper Lassenius;Maria Paasivaara

  • The Role of the Tester's Knowledge in Exploratory Software Testing

    Juha Itkonen;Mika V. M #x E;ntyl #x E;Casper Lassenius

  • Status Quo in Requirements Engineering: A Theory and a Global Family of Surveys

    Stefan Wagner;Daniel Méndez Fernández;Michael Felderer;Antonio Vetrò

  • Using scrum in a globally distributed project: a case study

    Maria Paasivaara;Sandra Durasiewicz;Casper Lassenius

Frequent Co-Authors

Maria Paasivaara
Maria Paasivaara Lappeenranta University of Technology
Mika V. Mäntylä
Mika V. Mäntylä University of Helsinki
Rafael Prikladnicki
Rafael Prikladnicki Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul
Daniela Damian
Daniela Damian University of Victoria
Michael Felderer
Michael Felderer University of Cologne
Guenther Ruhe
Guenther Ruhe University of Calgary
Roel Wieringa
Roel Wieringa University of Twente
Stefan Wagner
Stefan Wagner University of Stuttgart
Tayana Conte
Tayana Conte Federal University of Amazonas

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your expertise in Computer Science can open doors to several fast-growing and lucrative careers, especially with the flexibility of online education. Many students now opt for specialized programs, such as an accelerated cyber security program, to quickly build skills in high-demand fields like information security—often while balancing a full-time job.

For those interested in leadership and project management within technical and industrial settings, pursuing a construction management degree cost is another pathway. This field combines technical comprehension with the business side of complex projects, offering competitive salaries and job stability.

If you're drawn to law, public safety, or cybercrime, an online criminal justice degree can help you merge computing skills with investigative roles. These programs increasingly emphasize digital forensics due to rising cyber threats.

Additionally, an accounting degree complements technology backgrounds, especially as automation and data analytics transform financial roles. Combining Computer Science with accounting expertise can make you especially marketable in today's digital economy.

Best Scientists Citing Casper Lassenius

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles