World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
37
Citations
5771
World Ranking
10763
National Ranking
542

Jürgen Münch publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jürgen Münch sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 298 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jürgen Münch D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jürgen Münch sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jürgen Münch is affiliated with Reutlingen University in Germany and has an active research profile spanning several interconnected fields. Their main fields of study include Computer Science, Engineering, and Business, Management and Accounting, with contributions that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries.

Their research focuses on multiple subfields including Information Systems, Management of Technology and Innovation, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Artificial Intelligence, and Management Information Systems.

Münch's work covers a range of topics such as Software Engineering Techniques and Practices, Software Engineering Research, Technology Assessment and Management, Product Development and Customization, Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy, Design Education and Practice, and Intellectual Property and Patents.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Münch encompass the following:

  • What Makes Agile Software Development Agile? (2021, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering)
  • Towards the statistical construction of hybrid development methods (2020, Journal of Software Evolution and Process)
  • Turning students into Industry 4.0 entrepreneurs: design and evaluation of a tailored study program (2022, Entrepreneurship Education)
  • Towards a Secure DevOps Approach for Cyber-Physical Systems (2020, International Journal of Systems and Software Security and Protection)
  • The discovery effort worthiness index: How much product discovery should you do and how can this be integrated into delivery? (2023, Information and Software Technology)

Münch regularly publishes in venues such as Reutlingen University Academic Bibliography, Journal of Software Evolution and Process, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Entrepreneurship Education, and International Journal of Systems and Software Security and Protection.

Frequent collaborations are noted with researchers including Marco Kuhrmann, Stefan Trieflinger, Dominic Lang, Paolo Tell, and Jil Klünder.

In addition to articles, Münch has contributed to scholarly books, including a publication with Springer Science+Business Media titled Software Business (2024).

Best Publications

  • Empirical software engineering experts on the use of students and professionals in experiments

    Davide Falessi;Natalia Juristo;Claes Wohlin;Burak Turhan

  • Hybrid software and system development in practice: waterfall, scrum, and beyond

    Marco Kuhrmann;Philipp Diebold;Jürgen Münch;Paolo Tell

  • Linking Software Development and Business Strategy Through Measurement

    Victor R Basili;Mikael Lindvall;Myrna Regardie;Carolyn Seaman

  • The RIGHT model for Continuous Experimentation

    Fabian Fagerholm;Alejandro Sanchez Guinea;Hanna Mäenpää;Jürgen Münch;Jürgen Münch

  • Factors Influencing Software Development Productivity - State of the Art and Industrial Experiences

    Adam Trendowicz;Jürgen Münch

  • Is Water-Scrum-Fall Reality? On the Use of Agile and Traditional Development Practices

    Georgios Theocharis;Marco Kuhrmann;Jürgen Münch;Philipp Diebold

  • Back to the future: origins and directions of the “Agile Manifesto” – views of the originators

    Philipp Hohl;Jil Klünder;Arie van Bennekum;Ryan Lockard

  • Building blocks for continuous experimentation

    Fabian Fagerholm;Alejandro Sanchez Guinea;Hanna Mäenpää;Jürgen Münch

  • Raising the odds of success

    Eveliina Lindgren;Jürgen Münch

  • A systematic mapping study on the combination of static and dynamic quality assurance techniques

    Frank Elberzhager;Jürgen Münch;Vi Tran Ngoc Nha

  • GQM^+ Strategies -- Aligning Business Strategies with Software Measurement

    V. Basili;J. Heidrich;M. Lindvall;J. Munch

  • Hybrid Software Development Approaches in Practice: A European Perspective

    Marco Kuhrmann;Philipp Diebold;Jurgen Munch;Paolo Tell

  • GQM^+ Strategies -- Aligning Business Strategies with Software Measurement

    Unknown

  • The role of mentoring and project characteristics for onboarding in open source software projects

    Fabian Fagerholm;Alejandro S. Guinea;Jürgen Münch;Jay Borenstein

  • A Survey on the State of the Practice in Distributed Software Development: Criteria for Task Allocation

    Ansgar Lamersdorf;Jürgen Munch;Dieter Rombach

  • Performance Alignment Work

    Fabian Fagerholm;Marko Ikonen;Petri Kettunen;Jürgen Münch

  • Software project control centers: concepts and approaches

    JüRgen MüNch;Jens Heidrich

  • Software Process Definition and Management

    Unknown

  • Reducing test effort: A systematic mapping study on existing approaches

    Frank Elberzhager;Alla Rosbach;JüRgen MüNch;Robert Eschbach

  • Linking Software Development and Business Strategy Through Measurement

    Victor R. Basili;Jens Heidrich;Mikael Lindvall;Jürgen Münch

  • Creating Minimum Viable Products in Industry-Academia Collaborations

    Jürgen Münch;Fabian Fagerholm;Patrik Johnson;Janne Pirttilahti

  • Scoping software process lines

    Ove Armbrust;Masafumi Katahira;Yuko Miyamoto;Jürgen Münch

Frequent Co-Authors

Victor R. Basili
Victor R. Basili University of Maryland, College Park
Kurt Schneider
Kurt Schneider University of Hannover
Dietmar Pfahl
Dietmar Pfahl University of Tartu
Pekka Abrahamsson
Pekka Abrahamsson Tampere University
Stephen G. MacDonell
Stephen G. MacDonell Victoria University of Wellington
Michael Felderer
Michael Felderer University of Cologne
Carolyn Seaman
Carolyn Seaman University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Stefan Nickel
Stefan Nickel Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Mario Piattini
Mario Piattini University of Castilla-La Mancha
Stefan Wagner
Stefan Wagner University of Stuttgart

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online computer science degrees in the USA offers flexibility and a range of options for students from all backgrounds. For those concerned about tuition costs, cheap online colleges make earning a degree more accessible while maintaining quality education.

Some students worry about prior academic performance, but there are excellent college with low gpa options that allow learners to start or continue their computer science journey, even without a perfect record.

Many students are also interested in interdisciplinary opportunities. For example, with the technology sector’s growing focus on sustainability, earning related degrees can open doors to diverse fields—discover what jobs can you get with an environmental science degree if you’re considering a broader career path.

Lastly, learners eager to fast-track their education can look into 2-year computer science degree online options. These accelerated programs allow students to join the workforce or advance their careers more quickly without sacrificing educational standards.

Best Scientists Citing Jürgen Münch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles