World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
45
Citations
12083
World Ranking
7051
National Ranking
92

Natalia Juristo publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Natalia Juristo sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 204 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Natalia Juristo D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Natalia Juristo sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Natalia Juristo is affiliated with the Technical University of Madrid in Spain. Their research primarily focuses on the field of computer science, with specific contributions to software engineering and related subfields.

The main fields of study covered by their work include:

  • Computer Science

The subfields of study where they have notable publications are:

  • Information Systems
  • Software
  • Health Informatics
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Clinical Psychology

The key topics addressed in their research are:

  • Software Engineering Research
  • Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
  • Software Reliability and Analysis Research
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
  • Ethics in Clinical Research

Their publication record includes papers in several venues, with frequent contributions in:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
  • Empirical Software Engineering
  • Journal of Systems and Software

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Natalia Juristo include:

  • Empirical Standards for Software Engineering Research, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • An Agile-Based Integrated Framework for Mobile Application Development Considering Ilities, 2020, IEEE Access
  • Need for Sleep: The Impact of a Night of Sleep Deprivation on Novice Developers' Performance, 2020, CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Basilicata)
  • Effects of Mindfulness on Conceptual Modeling Performance: A Series of Experiments, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
  • Use and Misuse of the Term "Experiment" in Mining Software Repositories Research, 2021, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Óscar Dieste
  • Burak Turhan
  • Sira Vegas
  • Davide Fucci
  • Giuseppe Scanniello

Best Publications

  • METHONTOLOGY: From Ontological Art Towards Ontological Engineering

    M. Fernández-López;A. Gómez-Pérez;N. Juristo

  • Basics of Software Engineering Experimentation

    Natalia Juristo;Ana M. Moreno

  • Effectiveness of Requirements Elicitation Techniques: Empirical Results Derived from a Systematic Review

    A. Davis;O. Dieste;A. Hickey;N. Juristo

  • The role of replications in Empirical Software Engineering

    Forrest J. Shull;Jeffrey C. Carver;Sira Vegas;Natalia Juristo

  • Reviewing 25 Years of Testing Technique Experiments

    Natalia Juristo;Ana M. Moreno;Sira Vegas

  • How do personality, team processes and task characteristics relate to job satisfaction and software quality?

    Silvia T. Acuña;Marta Gómez;Natalia Juristo

  • Usability basics for software developers

    X. Ferre;N. Juristo;H. Windl;L. Constantine

  • Emphasizing human capabilities in software development

    S.T. Acuna;N. Juristo;A.M. Moreno

  • Empirical software engineering experts on the use of students and professionals in experiments

    Davide Falessi;Natalia Juristo;Claes Wohlin;Burak Turhan

  • Are students representatives of professionals in software engineering experiments

    Iflaah Salman;Ayse Tosun Misirli;Natalia Juristo

  • Developing search strategies for detecting relevant experiments

    Oscar Dieste;Anna Grimán;Natalia Juristo

  • Guidelines for Eliciting Usability Functionalities

    N. Juristo;A.M. Moreno;M.-I. Sanchez-Segura

  • Assigning people to roles in software projects

    Silvia T. Acuña;Natalia Juristo

  • Systematic review and aggregation of empirical studies on elicitation techniques

    O Dieste;N Juristo

  • Analysing the impact of usability on software design

    Natalia Juristo;Ana M. Moreno;Maria-Isabel Sanchez-Segura

  • Understanding replication of experiments in software engineering: A classification

    Omar S. Gómez;Natalia Juristo;Natalia Juristo;Sira Vegas

  • Is the European Industry Moving toward Solving Requirements Engineering Problems

    Natalia Juristo;Ana Moreno;Andrés Silva

  • Crossover Designs in Software Engineering Experiments: Benefits and Perils

    Sira Vegas;Cecilia Apa;Natalia Juristo

  • Replications types in experimental disciplines

    Omar S. Gómez;Natalia Juristo;Sira Vegas

  • Systematizing requirements elicitation technique selection

    Dante Carrizo;Oscar Dieste;Natalia Juristo

Frequent Co-Authors

Burak Turhan
Burak Turhan Monash University
Giuseppe Scanniello
Giuseppe Scanniello University of Salerno
Victor R. Basili
Victor R. Basili University of Maryland, College Park
Markku Oivo
Markku Oivo University of Oulu
Dietmar Pfahl
Dietmar Pfahl University of Tartu
Jeffrey C. Carver
Jeffrey C. Carver University of Alabama
Oscar Pastor
Oscar Pastor Universitat Politècnica de València
Forrest Shull
Forrest Shull Carnegie Mellon University
Robert Feldt
Robert Feldt Chalmers University of Technology
Jürgen Münch
Jürgen Münch Reutlingen University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education opens up a variety of pathways for students interested in computer science and related fields. With best associate degrees, learners can quickly build foundational skills and transition into the workforce or further study.

For students looking to combine technology with business acumen, online business degree programs offer flexible options to enhance career prospects across industries. Many online universities provide bachelor’s degrees in computer science, engineering, and related disciplines—often at a more affordable rate than traditional on-campus options.

Specialized paths, such as those offered in engineering online degree programs, allow students to dive deeper into fields like software, electrical, or mechanical engineering—all from the comfort of home.

By taking advantage of accredited online programs, students can start their journey, advance in their current roles, or switch careers—all while balancing other life commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Natalia Juristo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles